Jump to content


Ed Roth's '56 Ford Pick-up by Revell


  • You cannot reply to this topic
32 replies to this topic

#1 Austin T

Austin T

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,565 posts
  • Location:TN
  • Full Name:Austin Tyler

Posted 10 February 2012 - 02:10 AM

Model round-up has it as a may release,was it a good kit?Or is it a waste.Also If it's good then how hard is it to chop?
http://www.modelroun...-p/rmx-4914.htm

#2 Chuck Most

Chuck Most

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,005 posts
  • Location:Ithaca, Michiganistan
  • Full Name:^See Above

Posted 10 February 2012 - 02:20 AM

It's early '60's vintage tooling- that kit's biggest downfalls are the misshapen fenders and the somewhat fiddly fit of the hinged parts (the hood, doors, and tailgate all open). The engine and chassis are very nicely done, but for me the body kind of kills it.

The 'Hot Rod' magazine version from the early '90's and the red stock kit from the mid '90's are more or less the same kit- it looks like this one has the small back window from the earlier versions, not the wraparound rear window the later stock kit has. Chopping it might be a bit involved, on account of the opening doors, but certainly nothing impossible.

#3 Rob Hall

Rob Hall

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,126 posts
  • Location:Phoenix, Arizona
  • Full Name:Robert Hall

Posted 10 February 2012 - 06:11 AM

Looking at the box art pic Revell is showing, it has strange hubcaps it looks like....IIRC, the red stock kit had steelies w/ dog dish hubcaps...I wonder if this version has those also. I have an old builtup original issue one that was in a group of kits I bought about 20 years ago, but haven't had any of the later issues..

#4 Chuck Most

Chuck Most

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,005 posts
  • Location:Ithaca, Michiganistan
  • Full Name:^See Above

Posted 10 February 2012 - 06:46 AM

Looking at the box art pic Revell is showing, it has strange hubcaps it looks like....IIRC, the red stock kit had steelies w/ dog dish hubcaps...I wonder if this version has those also. I have an old builtup original issue one that was in a group of kits I bought about 20 years ago, but haven't had any of the later issues..

You're right- the red stock kit had the stock wheels and caps, and some tall, skinny Firestones from very worn tooling. I think about the only non-stock part in that particular issue was a dropped front axle.

#5 Rob Hall

Rob Hall

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,126 posts
  • Location:Phoenix, Arizona
  • Full Name:Robert Hall

Posted 10 February 2012 - 06:57 AM

You're right- the red stock kit had the stock wheels and caps, and some tall, skinny Firestones from very worn tooling. I think about the only non-stock part in that particular issue was a dropped front axle.


The question is, does the Ed Roth version have those parts as well?

#6 Chuck Most

Chuck Most

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,005 posts
  • Location:Ithaca, Michiganistan
  • Full Name:^See Above

Posted 10 February 2012 - 07:04 AM

The question is, does the Ed Roth version have those parts as well?

Anyone? If it does, I might be just a bit more inclined to pick one of these up! :D

For that, I will not even speculate... I've never personally owned the Roth version, and it has been several years since I have poked around in one. All I will say for sure it it's 99% the stock kit- the rolling stock, tonneau, and and decal sheet being the most noteworthy differences. Although this kit does sport the small back window from the earlier kits (such as the Hot Rod issue) while the red stock kit had the wraparound rear window.

#7 Rob Hall

Rob Hall

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,126 posts
  • Location:Phoenix, Arizona
  • Full Name:Robert Hall

Posted 10 February 2012 - 07:05 AM

Anyone? If it does, I might be just a bit more inclined to pick one of these up! :D

For that, I will not even speculate... I've never personally owned the Roth version, and it has been several years since I have poked around in one. All I will say for sure it it's 99% the stock kit- the rolling stock, tonneau, and and decal sheet being the most noteworthy differences. Although this kit does sport the small back window from the earlier kits (such as the Hot Rod issue) while the red stock kit had the wraparound rear window.

Interesting...I have no interest in the Roth aspect but a semi-stock '56 would be neat...the stock wheels would interest me. I wasn't aware of the rear window differences between issues.

#8 Chuck Most

Chuck Most

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,005 posts
  • Location:Ithaca, Michiganistan
  • Full Name:^See Above

Posted 10 February 2012 - 09:25 AM

It does appear that way, but... jeez, could the images be any more overexposed? :blink:
Looks like the worn out stock tires are making a comeback as well.

#9 Eshaver

Eshaver

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,870 posts
  • Location:Richmond Virginia for now
  • Full Name:Ed Shaver

Posted 10 February 2012 - 11:50 AM

If it were me , I would have Kiboshed the kit on the body alone . I actually have owned these trucks and I still have a 53. This kit begs for someone who can do just the fenders as they alone ruin an otherwise classic ride .

Now on Chopping a top on a 56, you would need to cut the rear as a section and then the front likewise . On an actual truck, the center needs some material in the middle . If not , the posts won't exactly line up well. I havent chopped a Revell model so I don't know what the results would be .However, I have done a 1-1 56............

Ed Shaver

#10 Chuck Most

Chuck Most

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,005 posts
  • Location:Ithaca, Michiganistan
  • Full Name:^See Above

Posted 10 February 2012 - 11:56 AM

The fenders are the weakest part of the kit- they're a bit too round in front, and just plain way off in back. You CAN graft on the better looking front fenders from the AMT '53 Trophy Series, you'll need to rework the '53 hood (which also looks better) quite a bit as well. Since the hood emblems are separate, you can use them on the AMT hood. The rear fenders are pretty much a simple matter of subsituting the AMT parts for the Revell parts. Not the easiest swap in the world overall, but the resulting model will look a lot better.

The roof on this has never looked right to me, either- especially the big back window version. But fixing the fenders goes a long way to improving the look.

#11 62rebel

62rebel

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,425 posts
  • Location:CHARLESTON SC

Posted 10 February 2012 - 12:21 PM

so, this issue has deleted the Pontiac 421 engine parts i remember? leaving only the y-block?

#12 Chuck Most

Chuck Most

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,005 posts
  • Location:Ithaca, Michiganistan
  • Full Name:^See Above

Posted 10 February 2012 - 02:58 PM

so, this issue has deleted the Pontiac 421 engine parts i remember? leaving only the y-block?

Yep. I think that option bit the dust when they retooled it in the mid '90's to restore it back to a stock version.

#13 Edsel-Dan

Edsel-Dan

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,375 posts
  • Location:Pocomoke, Maryland
  • Full Name:Daniel Lee Gunter

Posted 10 February 2012 - 04:45 PM

As I understand, The rear fenders are too wide for stock too.
A result of all those Hot-Rod style versions issued during the 70's & 80's

I have one of the Stock Re-issues. Not sure when I will get to it, but hope to some day!

#14 1972coronet

1972coronet

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,386 posts
  • Location:Murrieta (South-West Riverside County) , Ca
  • Full Name:John Shoe

Posted 10 February 2012 - 05:51 PM

I missed this last time 'round (circa 2003) , but am going to get one this time ; gonna massage the outta it !

I like the decals for their inclusion of the phone number to Roth's business ; the old "LUdlow" prefix in Maywood / Huntington Park .

#15 slusher

slusher

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,421 posts
  • Location:tennessee
  • Full Name:carl slusher

Posted 03 October 2013 - 01:14 PM

l had no ldea the kit was that old...



#16 Ace-Garageguy

Ace-Garageguy

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,197 posts
  • Location:Down two, then left.
  • Full Name:Bill Engwer

Posted 03 October 2013 - 02:51 PM

And I had no idea it had been reissued so many times, in some really weird versions.

 

That's one of the first kits I actually did a job on that I was kinda proud of...the original version, many many (many) moons ago. Painted it Testors dark blue rattlecan enamel, and got a second place in a local hobby shop contest.



#17 TooOld

TooOld

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,381 posts
  • Location:Citrus Park , Florida
  • Full Name:Bob Spedding

Posted 03 October 2013 - 03:51 PM

I've got the second one that you show ,  the "Super Trick Classic" .   I bought it in '77 but I'm not sure if that's when it was issued .  It's still unbuilt but I might get to it one of these days .



#18 1972coronet

1972coronet

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,386 posts
  • Location:Murrieta (South-West Riverside County) , Ca
  • Full Name:John Shoe

Posted 03 October 2013 - 04:02 PM

Concept-wise , that '56 F-100 was ahead of its time .

The box art always intrigued me ; the first one I ever bought was the early 70's reissue (the blue one) . I don't recall ever finishing it ; probably gave it to my neighbour .

I tried again when the Big Ten was issued ; failed miserably again .

By the time of the Street Demons release (circa 1983) , I was again tempted by its box art . It just looked so awesome ! That was the last time I bought one , as I was so turned off by its overkill application of chrome plating (a Revell and MPC issue at the time !) , and by its raked bed , that I just boxed it up and forgot about it ... until the 1987 earthquake .

 

When the 1995-ish issue was restored to its 1962 origins ( with , at last , those stock wheels with hub caps) made it tough for me to pass on trying the kit again !

 

Still apprehensive !

 

 

Thanks for the cool retro review , Casey :)



#19 Joker

Joker

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,780 posts
  • Location:Old Dominion
  • Full Name:James Scott

Posted 03 October 2013 - 04:42 PM

Got the metallic blue one.

Kinda "Swirly" tho.

Thanks for the box art pixs.



#20 Eshaver

Eshaver

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,870 posts
  • Location:Richmond Virginia for now
  • Full Name:Ed Shaver

Posted 04 October 2013 - 12:40 AM

Casey, I built the original issue . Built it stock too. Yes, I'm not going to say it was anywhere an easy task . The same issues that plagued that truck continue to be the kit's downfalls today . I never could accept the "Bug Eyed" grille or the way the top  of the windshield was cut in . Look, I've owned these trucks as 1-1's . I still own a 53 .

 

For what it's worth to one here , THIS Truck was the first Ford since 1950 to offer a "Factory " Chrome grille too.

 

Since you have the 1962 Box , did you notice the tooling similarities between the Mickey Thompson kit engines and the Optional Pontiac engine in that issue ? I think they may be the same tooling .