Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Brutalform

Members
  • Posts

    2,176
  • Joined

  • Last visited

6 Followers

About Brutalform

  • Birthday 03/03/1966

Previous Fields

  • Are You Human?
    Yes
  • Scale I Build
    1/25

Profile Information

  • Full Name
    Tom Andrukaitis

Recent Profile Visitors

10,783 profile views

Brutalform's Achievements

MCM Ohana

MCM Ohana (6/6)

  1. Yes, I have Keith’s decals for this car as well. I guess the AMT, and Monogram are both not worth it, unless you want to replicate the box art of the Monogram car.
  2. I saw those on his website. I wish I knew about them earlier. Probably could have been added to my 66 Fairlanes as well.
  3. Big thanks to Scott for super fast shipping, and well packed products. And IMHO some of the nicest drag wheels and tires I ever saw. I can’t wait to get into my new hobby room and put some of his parts to good use. A 9 second 69 Camaro is in the plans.
  4. I haven’t been at my bench in a long while. I just bought a new house, and spent a while doing some renovations. Now that I have a beautiful room in the basement for my new model room, I plan on getting some old projects finished. Hopefully I’ll start setting it all up next week. I bought a bunch of items from Scott at Futurattraction, and plan on a couple of drag cars with his stuff. By the way, I’ve never seen nicer wheels and tires that Scott supplied me with. The parts are well worth the money, and I can’t wait to get started. Haven’t been building for almost a year now. You know how it goes….not building for a while, and all these ideas come to mind.
  5. How about the Monogram 69 Camaro, compared to the AMT? That Monogram (white drag car on the box) looks out of proportion.
  6. Now it’s coming back to me. It’s just whenever I saw a 69 Camaro, the only choice I remember was the Revell. Until AMT released their version of it. I have a few of the Revell kits, red, blue, and white styrene. Definitely going to pass on the AMT.
  7. Yes. I completely forgot about the 67 Chevelle. I have both in the stash. That rear fascia offered on the pro street version isn’t the prettiest. I even grabbed the original “stock” rear bumper from the blue Revell kit in case I ever got around to building that car. Actually I tossed it in the pro street box so it will be easy to find.
  8. I kinda figured. The Revell kit is a nice kit, but I was watching one of those Fast and Furious movies earlier, and it had the YSC Camaro in it, and I saw AMT had produced that kit. The main reason I asked, is, it seemed odd to me, that two model makers have the rights to the same year car. And maybe the AMT was a decent model. Since Lindberg kits are now AMT, and you can find both names out there, with the same model, but I don’t remember ever seeing too many, if, any kits both made by AMT and Revell. Is the 69 Camaro the first that is molded by both makers?
  9. Would anyone like to provide some opinions on the AMT 69 Camaro, compared to the Revell car? I have a few of the Revell versions, and plan on a stock Yenko build, and a drag car build as well. I was planning on grabbing an AMT kit, but if it’s not really worth doing so, I’d just build the Revell kits. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
  10. It appears that he is using a Testors product, and not Tamiya.
  11. Found this pic on eBay. Going for big bucks.
  12. It’s funny you posted this, as I was thinking, just the other day, about the tin garage I once had. Not totally sure if I had a Marx Garage when I was young, but I did get a tin garage from Santa Clause. Can’t remember what year, but I was probably 7 years old. I found a couple of pics of the tin one I had.
  13. Thanks guys. That top of the grill with the FORD script will have to go. Not there on a 69. Also the center on the grill can be removed too. I can make it work though. Not too far off of 69 grill. Thanks Steve for the pics.
  14. It’s pretty sad to say that, nothing seems to be what it used to be anymore. I have this silly little thing about me, and that is when I buy something, all I expect is that it does what’s intended. At least for a little while. It’s appalling how “new” items such as refrigerators , ovens, TVs, or otherwise simple things like model paint, are so cheaply made, (but always cost more), just fail to perform like they should. I’ve had several Testors do this also, but never Tamiya. And no one cares, as long as they have your money. Years ago companies stood by their products, and a few still do, but it’s pretty sad when they constantly hound you to pay extra for extended warranty coverage. How about stand by your product to begin with, or build it a little better? Just sayin
×
×
  • Create New...