Roadrunner Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 My best search efforts here yielded zero, so can anyone tell me if this kit is a good one? I've always liked the Nomads, and a stab at a 1:16 kit sounds great, but I have no familiarity with the kit. Also, is there any AM for it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Longbox55 Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 It's ok, but comes off as a bit toylike overall out of the box. The front suspension, doors, and front seats are probably the worst parts. As far as I know, there is no aftermarket for this kit. Also, unlike the AMT 1/25 scale Nomad, the rear liftgate and tailgate does not open, but the doors and hood do. It also does not have the poseable steering like the smaller kit, and uses a 1/8" steel rod to mount the front wheels, same as the 1/16 scale Mustang kit.I built one about 25 years ago when I was in high school, I didn't think it was too bad overall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadrunner Posted December 28, 2014 Author Share Posted December 28, 2014 Thanks, Bill. That starts me off in the right direction. I suspect that with few exceptions, most of my stuff will end up all closed, so opening doors and such are really not all that important to me right now, as long as the overall proportions seem correct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casey Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 as long as the overall proportions seem correct. The bodies of AMT's 1/16 '55 and '57 Chevy kits seem pretty good at first glance, but as Bill mentioned, the balance of the kits are a bit simplified. The rear leaf springs and rear axle are molded as one part, and the parts count isn't quite what one would expect or like to see from a larger scale kit like this. It's a good starting point, but plan on adding a lot more detail. The opening doors are kind of clunky and "thick" looking when opened, as the jamb areas don't look very realistic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadrunner Posted December 28, 2014 Author Share Posted December 28, 2014 OK, Casey, thanks for the input. Once I have a few extra bucks in my pocket (and that may be a while), I'lll probably go ahead and grab one. There seem to be some acceptable wheel/tire combinations in other 1:16 kits that I may be able to use on one of these. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DumpyDan Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 Yes but it was fun to build, I have build a couple of these over the years, the last one I built was custom. Being a bigger scale does make for some interesting customs. I have one sitting on a chair in my room waiting for the next show, a guy approach me asking if I had one. I would build another, I also have the 57 Nomad and Bel- Air 1/16 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadrunner Posted December 28, 2014 Author Share Posted December 28, 2014 It does seem like it would be fun. I also noticed that this thread has been moved, so I'll keep that in mind for my next questions of this sort. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1972coronet Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 There seem to be some acceptable wheel/tire combinations in other 1:16 kits that I may be able to use on one of these. You mean to tell me that you don't like the snow tyres / Cragar S/ST's combo ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blunc Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 I have to second what Casey stated, "it's a good starting point." The 1/16 scale AMT kits are "loaded with opportunities"....meaning the basic shapes are alright but there are so many things that need to be done in order to finish with features that should have been included in a kit this size. I have acquired a few 1/16 scale kits, I'm planning on them taking a while to complete to my satisfaction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Myers Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 BIG, clunky, and crude, but, because it is BIG it allows one to really get into detailing. But there again, being of a large scale (1/16) kits to kit bash are few and far between , at least in the average builders stash. Wheels are nice Cragar S/S mags. Tires, well John's "Snow tire" description , just about covers it. The chassis, front and rear suspension lend themselves to fine detailing.As a mater of fact the front is very easy to make a working suspension if you can come up with a workable set of springs.I wound my own from some stretched sprue. The engine and transmission , here again, not very realistic. You'll have to search for a donor kit. So if ya gotta have BIG, you have your work cut out for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Myers Posted December 28, 2014 Share Posted December 28, 2014 (edited) MPC Corvettes good for the engine and tires Lot's of Revell Funny cars if you really want to go wild, HEMI, BIG slicks check out this just Reissued Lindberg Tee bucket. Six 2's on a great older Chevy hot rod engine. Edited December 28, 2014 by Greg Myers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1972coronet Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 I hope that Round2 will reissue this series (they already reissued that catastropy-but-not-their-fault 1964 Mustang Coupe) . Those ePay prices are ridiculous for these kits ! With the idea of a reissue in mind ; let's hope that they trash those ugly "snow tyres" (the stock version's skinny Firestone tyres are just fine) ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkman Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 (edited) I agree that those kits only really make sense when you get them at a reasonable price. They aren't really bad, but they are oveerall a bit disappointing, especially considering that there already were better detailed 1/25 kits around, when these were made. One project lingering in my forehead for a long time is building all 6 tri-Chevies, and putting them onto a scratchbuilt car transporter hauled by the Monogram Peterbilt, or Kenworth. BTW, the '55 Tbird kit contains a superb set of Kelsey Hayes wire wheels, which would do no harm to the Lindberg T bucket. Edited December 29, 2014 by Junkman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Myers Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 "catastropy-but-not-their-fault 1964 Mustang Coupe" ? The Tri-Five kits are no better or worse,with each kit having some saving grace, the wheels , in most cases. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
my80malibu Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 There is no oil filter provided for the engine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1972coronet Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 (edited) "catastropy-but-not-their-fault 1964 Mustang Coupe" ? The Tri-Five kits are no better or worse,with each kit having some saving grace, the wheels , in most cases. I cite the '64 Mustang Coupe as being a catasotrphy only in the sence that its A-pillar / windshield area is so obviously off to the most casual observer . It's through my experiences that the Tri-Five kits aren't *nearly* as grotesque as that '64 Mustang . Edited December 29, 2014 by 1972coronet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casey Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 There is no oil filter provided for the engine. Which is correct for the '55 265-- the oil filter wasn't added until 1956. The valve covers also have the early bolt pattern. I agree that those kits only really make sense when you get them at a reasonable price. ^ This Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadrunner Posted December 29, 2014 Author Share Posted December 29, 2014 You mean to tell me that you don't like the snow tyres / Cragar S/ST's combo ? i've only ever seen the box cover, so had no idea what, if any, other wheels may have been included. Cragars are fine with me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadrunner Posted December 29, 2014 Author Share Posted December 29, 2014 Thanks for the input, Greg. Given that I'd probably do this as doors, hood and tailgate closed, the engine becomes more or less irrelevant to me. Just a nice clean '55 on the shelf, that's what I'm after. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkman Posted December 29, 2014 Share Posted December 29, 2014 They will definitely build into very nice curbsides, that's for sure. The lines and proportions aren't bad at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
horsepower Posted December 30, 2014 Share Posted December 30, 2014 (edited) For those that are going to point out that the 1/25 scale '55 Chevy kits from Revell have an oil filter, the remote filter they have that's right in front of the air cleaner on the intake manifold is an option, kind of a Mickey Mouse looking affair with little 1/8 npt fittings in the front of the block feeding it with oil directly from the oil passage along the cam valley, it was a full flow filter without a bypass if it plugged up, and ,or from having such small lines caused some real restrictions if you tried running it with much oil pressure or at a very high RPM, most serious racers drilled and retapped the block for bigger line's and a less restrictive plumbing set-up, a lot of racers just didn't run a filter at all and took their chances, it was the big bucks NASCAR guys that redid the oiling system for more reliability, the filter actually being one of the minor changes. Edited December 30, 2014 by horsepower Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Myers Posted December 30, 2014 Share Posted December 30, 2014 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atmobil Posted December 30, 2014 Share Posted December 30, 2014 I had the 55 Nomad and 57 Bel Air coupe, convertible and Nomad kits a few years ago (had to sell them due to economy) and I thoght they looked quite good. I sure could have added details to them if I had ever got around to building them but in my eyes they looked quite good. I would have built them stock as that is the way I prefer the Chevys of this generation. I also had the 79 Pontiac Trans Am 10th anniversary kit and that was something I really wanted to build (had to sell that one too). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadrunner Posted December 30, 2014 Author Share Posted December 30, 2014 Thanks for the input, fellas. I feel a lot more confident now about buying one. Any particular boxing I should look for, or do they all basically contain the same stuff? (That is a mighty peculiar oil filter arrangement; I've never seen anything like that before.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkman Posted December 30, 2014 Share Posted December 30, 2014 It doesn't matter which box you buy it in, it's always the same kit inside. The ones in "Matchbox/AMT" boxes are likely moulded in a plastic resembling curd soap, but that doesn't make them worse to build. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.