Mr. Metallic
Members-
Posts
2,531 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About Mr. Metallic
- Birthday 12/09/1976
Previous Fields
-
Are You Human?
yes
-
Scale I Build
all
Contact Methods
-
Website URL
http://public.fotki.com/crstan/
-
Facebook
Low Note Rod Custom and Speed Shop
Profile Information
-
Full Name
Craig Stansfield
Recent Profile Visitors
11,000 profile views
Mr. Metallic's Achievements
MCM Ohana (6/6)
-
AMT 1957 Chevrolet Cameo
Mr. Metallic replied to Jonathan's topic in WIP: Model Trucks: Pickups, Vans, SUVs, Light Commercial
It shouldn't really bog you down I wouldn't think It's can be just a U shaped piece that fits around the bottom of the interior tub and takes up the space between the interior tub and the body. -
That body color just POPS!
-
First off Marty, I'm glad you are bringing this one back to the bench again. You keep teasing us with it at KKIM when it shows up on the tables. It deserves to get finished. That being said, I love everything about it, with the exception of the new hood scoop. But digging the Corvette bumps And the top has to stay!
-
The execution of the fender flares on the 69 is very clean. The paint combo on the 32 is very nice Well done.
-
I've used the Testors Wet Look clear and Tamiya clear lacquer interchangeably for years. Test it on a smaller part that you could paint a different color (since you're out of that orange) if you're still unsure, like the firewall. Or how about one of the spare fenders you tested the orange on?
-
Off to a good start, nice collection of parts. My opinion, needs some more rubber and/or bigger wheels in the rear.
-
I have yet to see the 30 Coupe at HL since the retool. See the 29 roadster all the time, but never the 30 coupe.
-
Shutdown - Corvette Stingray vs. Super Stock Dodge
Mr. Metallic replied to SpeedShift's topic in WIP: Model Cars
My understanding is the Revell 63 non-glue kit (snap 🤫) is the most accurate. Then a few builders have put the chassis from the Revell 67 underneath to make it full detail. Not sure how involved you want to get, just throwing it out there. -
-
Molotow Pens not Shiny
Mr. Metallic replied to Olderisbetter's topic in General Automotive Talk (Trucks and Cars)
If you seek out one of the Molotow threads in the Tips or Questions areas there is advice about care and steps to restore the pens. My preferred method is to buy the refill bottle and brush it on. and then you don't have to worry about the tip. It's about $30, but it last so much longer it's worth it and easier to use in my opinion. -
Nice clean build. looks like you got the tricky part done right and got the windshield laid back where it should be. great color.
-
Looking For Info On This Trailer
Mr. Metallic replied to oldcarfan's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
A little added info, the ramps are NOT included in the Fireball 500 version. -
Why was the Supernatural 67 Impala 4 door kit discontued?
Mr. Metallic replied to GMP440's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
Found it for you, all 22 pages worth. Admins- maybe combine this topic with the main one? -
Revell Deuce Tudor being reissued
Mr. Metallic replied to CabDriver's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
Thanks for the clarification. But it still stands that we probably won't see the 96 tool roadster again, especially while the NEW roadster /RR is in the catalog. -
Revell Deuce Tudor being reissued
Mr. Metallic replied to CabDriver's topic in Car Kit News & Reviews
Swiped this from Megahobby to add a little more info to the conversation. 1- Looks like it's the slotted wheels from the original 96 tool roadster. This is the first appearance outside of the roadster reissues to have those wheels. 2- Wire wheels as well, which were in the initial issue of the Tudor. 3- Drag City Casting just happens to have a Fordor and a chopped Tudor body available right now. @krassandbernie 4- stavanzer, I'm not sure if we will ever see the 96 tool roadster again. The story behind what became the Rat Roaster project was that the 96 roadster tool was so tired that Revell was going to have to invest in making a new tool, so they took the opportunity to make something a little different from the 96 version. @tim boyd could maybe confirm?