Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Move over, Gerald Wingrove


Recommended Posts

  • 1 year later...

A nice bit of photography for sure. Are they the best out there? maybe. There are a number of long time builders with scratch-from-nothing skills and original models in multiple scales that are at the least "comparable". At 1/5 scale you have a lot of room to work, and 1/8 gives someone who can do machine work and make their own parts a definite advantage. Having the reference material to start with is one of the keys, and it sounds like The "doc" has amassed a considerable amount.

Then, it's a matter of time...and more time...and more time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Well, it's hard to beat Gerald Wingrove but this guy is in the same league.

http://www.drmischko.com/

I agree, same league but Gerald Wingrove does most of his work himself and I do believe I never saw anywhere that he states his models are the Best in the World.........humbleness goes a great distance more than arrogance.

Nice models yes, art yes............and some do look like clones, albeit way more advanced than a Pocher, but Pocher like none the less.

Rick

PS: Am I jealous, yes :mellow:

Edited by Pocherphile
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though the OP was from 2010, it makes me grit my teeth when I see the words "move over Mr. Wingrove" in a sentence. It usually ends comparing Mr. Wingrove's craftsmanship with something completely different and nothing like what Mr. Wingrove does.

This post was not an exception.

Remember that Mr. Wingrove works in 1/15th scale. These cars are 1/8 and 1/5 and there is a team of craftsmen making them where Mr. Wingrove does most of his own work. At one time he farmed the plating out and I think that was about it.

The cars in the link are very nicely done. Far better than I could ever hope to do in 10,000 years. They are in a class of their own. Mr. Wingrove doesn't need to move over for anybody.

Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Misko models are indeed superb, as are similarly the Amalgam Models range.

But to put it into perspective, they are produced by groups of highly skilled specialists in a small industrial envirinment, where various skills are pulled together to make the components for a finished model, and they both work in large scales as well.

Wingrove's models are to a much smaller scale and he did everyting from the initial research and drawings to making everyting himself in the early days, and later when he re married, his second wife Phyllis took an active part in the model making process. They have now retired to Spain.

There are other well known solo professional builders of model cars worth looking at who are on a par with Gerald Wingrove. Look at the models of Manuel Olive Sans, Rex Hays, Henri Baigent, Michele Conti, Guiseppe da Corte and Carlo Brianza who's models have become highly valuable over the years. More recently hobbyist and retired Kodak USA Engineer Tom Kirn has taken the Wingrove route and made some superb 1/15th scale models, and also Francisco Pulido in Spain. There is also a superb professional car modeller in the UK named David Hayward who works mainly in wood. All of whom are individual model makers.

If you have not heard of any of these artisans, a trawl on the internet should pull up some info and pictures of their work.

Edited by Bugatti Fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was being facetious in my title, "Move Over Gerald Wingrove," but that's too subtle, I guess. In another context, it would be like saying, "Move over daVinci, take a look at Andrew Wyeth." Or "Roll over, Beethoven." All of these examples propose the person in question as the standard by which others in their field are judged. As I said in my original post, "Well, it's hard to beat Gerald Wingrove but this guy is in the same league." I don't see how that puts down Gerald Wingrove.

With that in mind, may I suggest another group of modelers who are among the world's best?

http://www.fineartmodels.com/Welcome.html

No one has more respect for Mr. Wingrove than I do, and he has been exceedingly generous in answering my personal questions over the years. Of course, I expect those who are already confirmed in their point of view to quibble with this.

But it doesn't matter how the techniques or the scale may differ among the world's best modelers, they're still terrific however they do them.

Edited by sjordan2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And how does the scale matter in the scheme of things?

Actually it plays a huge part. The bigger the scale, the more detail that HAS to go into it or it is glaringly obvious it is missing. I'm finding this out building in 1/8 scale after moving up from 1/24 and 1/25. The work also has to be at a higher level because the smallest imperfection stands out too.

Kinda wish I had followed Wingrove's example and built in 1/15 scale instead. He's the only reason I got back into model building.

Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually it plays a huge part. The bigger the scale, the more detail that HAS to go into it or it is glaringly obvious it is missing. I'm finding this out building in 1/8 scale after moving up from 1/24 and 1/25. The work also has to be at a higher level because the smallest imperfection stands out too.

Kinda wish I had followed Wingrove's example and built in 1/15 scale instead. He's the only reason I got back into model building.

Mike

Actually, the scale as brassbuilder mentioned is 1:15, not 1:5. I always thought that 1:15 was an unusual choice, though he has also worked in 1:20, but he explains it best himself --

"...However it was not long before the collectors started to ask for this detail also, which I did not think very practical on so small a scale. So for the more detailed models I chose 1.15th scale, for no better reason than that it was between 1.20 and 1/10th scale, the latter, in my opinion, being to large for an artistic representation of a classic car, these being the subjects that seemed to be in demand. It turned out that 1/15th was not a regular scale to work in, 1/8 and 1/16th being more usual. However many years down the line, I came across several original drawings for the Bugatti Type 41 chassis, and was most pleased to find them drafted in 1.15th scale."

My point about how much scale matters is that fabulous work can be done at any scale.

Edited by sjordan2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

This guy is no slouch either. I typed the link in here because it wouldn't cut & paste. Amazing work!

http://forums.aaca.org/f190/construction-continental-marl-ii-model-scale-278354.html

Yes, his work is amazing. You can follow his detailed Continental build, along with more large-scale goodies from others, here (he's about 3-4 years into this model)

http://www.scalemotorcars.com/forum/showthread.php?36929-Continental-Mark-II

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...