Chuck Kourouklis Posted August 27, 2014 Share Posted August 27, 2014 x 2. Usual Suspect nailed it again. Conversely, I have a hard time seeing why more people don't have Roger's philosophy about it - if it's good enough for you, then why should it matter to the point of personal offense what anybody else has to say about it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keyser Posted August 27, 2014 Share Posted August 27, 2014 That's the reason Meh is the new good. Same reason we have cr@p politicians who do jack, send young volunteers to sandbox that has been mess for eons to get dismembered. Why ISIS "appears" when we've been in the neighborhood for over a decade. Little details disturb people, harshes their mellow. Makes them mad when they're pointed out. They don't understand compound error. SHrug and move on. It isn't a personal offense when errors pointed out, but if one doesn't care, or missed it, inexplicably get annoyed. Yet people watch cr@ptastic TV where idiots call others idiots and think it's swell. I've never run a business based on "good enough for me". Doesn't matter what business it is, toy cars, big business, whatever. Sadly, people are often given what others think they need, not what is best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Goschke Posted August 27, 2014 Author Share Posted August 27, 2014 I'd rather not see us digress from easily repairable flaws in the new '57 Chevy kit to some folks acceptance of those errors symbolizing wider ills in geopolitics and modern society. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts