Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

1957 CADILLAC ELDORADO BROUGHAM,,quality questions?


gtx6970

Recommended Posts

I'm building one as a chopped custom. All the remarks so far are accurate. It's definitely NOT a shake-the-box-self-assembling kit, but with skill and patience, it will make a beautiful model. It's very short on detail though, so depending on what you want from it, a lot of kitbashing may be required. I haven't measured it out, but I think the wheelbase and rear doors may be a little short. It also has hard plastic tires.

Edited by Ace-Garageguy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bought one of these kits several months ago for my "Class of '57" but I've been reluctant to work on it due to all of the horror stories I've heard regarding the multi-piece body. I keep hoping for a diecast or promo to appear on EBAY but the only 2 diecasts that I've seen during the past year went into the stratosphere price-wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm building one as a chopped custom. All the remarks so far are accurate. It's definitely NOT a shake-the-box-self-assembling kit, but with skill and patience, it will make a beautiful model. It's very short on detail though, so depending on what you want from it, a lot of kitbashing may be required. I haven't measured it out, but I think the wheelbase and rear doors may be a little short. It also has hard plastic tires.

Somewhere I have a line drawing created by Bob Clidinst out of Indianapolis, giving all the measurements of the real '57 Eldorado Brougham (once owned and driven by Anton Hulman Jr., long time owner of Indianapolis Motor Speeway, and housed in the collection of the Speedway Museum. Bob did all the critical measurements--here's what he found:

Wheelbase, width and height are extremely close to correct for 1/25 scale, but the overall length is 18" too short on the model, that being in front of the front wheel arches (3 scale inches). The rest of the body is correct for length. What throws most people off is that the actual '57-'58 Eldorado Brougham is a shorter car than any other Cadillac. The rear doors are short on the real car, just as they are on the model, due to the roof being "close coupled" as it is. However, the rear doors are "suicide style", hinged at their rear edge, and there is NO B-Pillar whatsoever in that body. Instead of a B-post, there is a short, slightly angled pillar that comes up only about half the height of the door, that has only a latching plate. As such, the rear doors didn't need the length normally thought necessary, when hinging those doors to a B-pillar.

The wheels and tires are much too large in diameter--those cars rode on 14" rims, just like very other Cadillac of the era. There are some anomalies with regard to body surfaces, they don't exactly match up side to side, but nothing that cannot be corrected if one wants to make the model more accurate. The tops of the front fenders are missing the pairs of narrow air scoops, and the cowl vent isn't all that great as well. On the plus side, the interior is actually pretty decent though.

The actual car rode on a shorter version of the X-shaped frame that Cadillac pioneered, and was used by both Cadillac and Chevrolet through the 1964 model year.

Art

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wheelbase, width and height are extremely close to correct for 1/25 scale, but the overall length is 18" too short on the model, that being in front of the front wheel arches (3 scale inches).

Did you mean 1/8"?

The wheels and tires are much too large in diameter--those cars rode on 14" rims, just like very other Cadillac of the era.

I thought those were 15" rims?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is just me, but I always thought that kit had some proportional problems. The width, length, relationship/shape of the roofline in proportion to the rest of the car, just never appeared correct to me. I tried building one back in the mid '90's with some corrections, but gave up on it. Might try to attempt it again someday.

Now as Art said, with some time and patience, it can be built into something very nice. Gunze Sangyo did a 1/32 scale version years ago and while it's not the "correct" scale for many folks, it looks light years ahead in appearance as opposed to the Revell version.

Might be worth checking it out........... ;)

Edit: Some pics for comparison..........

Revell's builtup as swiped off of Photobucket:

CadillacBrougham004.jpg

CadillacBrougham007.jpg

And the 1:1.......

1957_eldorado_brougham_3.jpg

ebay274606.jpg

Jus' sayin............ B)

Edited by MrObsessive
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have found that the 59 caddi chassis and engine bay fits quite well after a bit of shortening . Ive still not finished mine but im on the home strait . The rear edge of the hood is the wrong shape . Also the parcel shelf is wrong too. The front end needs a bit of work around the top of the bumper as well.

Bill do you know who build that one you showed ? I would be interested in finding out where or how the badges where done :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who ever did the build above, did a great job. Yet the proportions are little off. But, it looks like it can be built into a decent representation of an Eldorado Brougham. It's got me thinking. I've had pretty good results building multi-piece bodied Revell kits in the past. I may need to add this one to my collection.

Scott

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The real car comparisons and Art's dimensional references are helpful.

The slightly-off proportions of the model and the many minor but obvious errors are what prompted me to build the thing as a custom rather than trying to go stock. I'm also using Revellogram '59 Caddy chassis and guts.

If you look at the rear comparison shots, you'll notice the real decklid tucks under a little, while the model slopes to the rear. The model's Dagmars are too big and not pointy enough. The rear window is wrong, especially the corners being sharp on the model and round on the real car. Side glass appears to be slightly too tall. And somehow, the tail of the model looks to me more Plymouth than the iconic Cadillacness the real car represents. The shape of the top of the rear wheel arches is flat on the real car, rounded on the model. Etc.

I also think the model body could benefit from a minor sectioning job just over the line of the front chrome side spear.

That built blue model looks awfully good though. Methinks I'm needing a few more of these for rocketship customs.

And now that I've figured out how to do a durable brushed-metal finish (for the Caddy roof) I just MAY have to build one of these as a stocker.

DSCN1271_zps79373f2d.jpg

Edited by Ace-Garageguy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill do you know who build that one you showed ? I would be interested in finding out where or how the badges where done :)

Dave, I have no idea. I just did a search for Revell '57 Cadillac Eldorado Brougham, and that's one of the pics that turned up. You might want to check out the '59 Cadillac PE set from Model Car Garage. I have a set (not in front of me at the moment---packed away in the attic), and those badges and letters look familiar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have Both kits, The Revell SSP, And Gunze's 1'32

I can tell you that the Gunze kit, while having a 1pc Body, uses

the 59 Biarittz Chassis, seats, dash & Steering wheel UNALTERED

The Sombrero caps are the same too, but were on the Actual cars!!!

(At least in the pic's above)

here is one of my Gunze 1/32's:

57Brougham-started_zpse4b29694.jpg

and the second

57Brougham_zps604f80c8.jpg

You might even see the 59 Biarittz's Boot cover is Still on the tree too!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those who are interested, there is an extensive feature article on the '57/'58 Eldorado Brougham i(with lotsa pictures) in the new issue of Hemming's Classic Car magazine (April, 2015), it just showed up in my mailbox on Thursday so it may not be on the newstand yet. TIM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...