I'll take all the johan kits I can get my hands on to fill the subject matter I concentrate on ( just bought an unbuilt 1962 Dodge today actually) This is about 2/3rds of what I own
jo-han molds??
#81
Posted 25 October 2012 - 03:18 PM
I'll take all the johan kits I can get my hands on to fill the subject matter I concentrate on ( just bought an unbuilt 1962 Dodge today actually) This is about 2/3rds of what I own
#82
Posted 25 October 2012 - 06:13 PM
> it's wise to remember that in the 1960's, kids were not enamored with model kits of AMC Ramblers, Rambler Americans, Cadillacs, full-
>sized Oldsmobiles, Studebaker Larks. Likewise, while HARD to believe today, Plymouths, Chryslers and DeSoto's were pretty low on
>the popularity scale with the kids who were the 1960's primary market for model car kits. This factor alone dictated that for the most
>part, JoHan kits were pretty low on most 12-16yr old model car builders' radar screens.
that was exactly my experience as that (lower end of) 12 - 16 model car builder back then. those sort of prototypes just were not cutting it up against 32 fords, dragsters and model Ts, and for me personally, the Revell line of rods and customs. particularly the American Motors cars...pretty low on the desirability scale back then and i tended to think the customizing accessories were hopelessly outdated. Now of course i wish i had a couple sets of those glue on "louvers" and some glue on fins and that other junk but back then i thought that stuff was dumb and looked dumber.
#83
Posted 25 October 2012 - 06:26 PM
#84
Posted 25 October 2012 - 06:49 PM
What could have been.
I always drew a parallel between Jo-Han and AMC, both being independents, and compared to their much larger competitors, not nearly as well funded.
I remember walking into
FWIW, there was someone on ebay selling what looked to be original Jo-Han artwork a few months ago, and the seller was located in Romeo, MI. I think the Comet or Maverick artwork was one of the items, and it was not very expensive...$30 or so. I always wondered if the person had a connection with Jo-Han or not, but never thought to ask then.
#85
Posted 25 October 2012 - 10:04 PM
The truth is, that like the 1948 Tucker, the missing molds were bought by shill bidders from AMT & Revell.
Then they were hidden at a ranch in Roswell, NM & later went to a storage hanger at Area 51 where they remain till this very day.....
I thought I knew a lot of the history, but that story is completely alien to me.
#86
Posted 26 October 2012 - 10:11 AM
I thought I knew a lot of the history, but that story is completely alien to me.
All stories about Area 51 are baseless.
#87
Posted 26 October 2012 - 10:39 AM
But seriously folks, I bought a '56 Olds 98 4-dr a while back, apparently produced as a taxi in yellow plastic with green windows. Marked Johan on the bottom. I had intended to hack it up into a '55 custom. What's the deal with the thing? Both the model and the box look like they were made last week.
#88
Posted 26 October 2012 - 10:54 AM
#89
Posted 26 October 2012 - 10:55 AM
I always drew a parallel between Jo-Han and AMC, both being independents, and compared to their much larger competitors, not nearly as well funded.
Now imagine what might've happened if Jo-Han had decided to gamble big on a project to help shed their stodgy image and improve sales prospects. They decide to kit the American Motors AMX 3 based on the anticipated sales that would accrue via the magic of exotic box art, blissfully unaware that AMC's costs of development would eventually relegate it to an engineering exercise. AMC agrees to allow them to produce the kit, but with the proviso that Jo-Han is not allowed to use outdated Rambler engines in it. Does the gambit work, or does the modeling world's lack of awareness about the real car keep it from being a success?
#90
Posted 26 October 2012 - 11:05 AM

I found the whole Seville Enterprises story pretty interesting, too, and again, we're left to wonder what might've been if that promo made it to production and Jo-Han/Seville actually had a new promo/kit in its lineup.
#91
Posted 26 October 2012 - 11:39 AM
I remember walking into
HobbytownModel Empire for the first time in 1992 or so, seeing some of the X-El '55 Belvedere (maybe it was the '55 Pontiac?) promos with the green tinted "glass", and wondering "Why green?"
Because the factory tinted glass in early and mid 50's cars had a green cast to it, and over doing the % hid the lack of interior.
#92
Posted 26 October 2012 - 04:21 PM
#93
Posted 26 October 2012 - 04:29 PM
#94
Posted 26 October 2012 - 05:49 PM
Because the factory tinted glass in early and mid 50's cars had a green cast to it, and over doing the % hid the lack of interior.
That makes perfect sense.
#95
Posted 26 October 2012 - 05:51 PM
nothing like beating a dead horse.
#96
Posted 26 October 2012 - 06:02 PM
#97
Posted 26 October 2012 - 06:08 PM
I was just looking at some of my unbuilt Jo-Han kits the other day and other than the body, they are rather crude, even for those times.
Which is why I dont get why everyone wants or wished Jo-Han would return
#98
Posted 26 October 2012 - 07:17 PM
#99
Posted 26 October 2012 - 07:25 PM
#100
Posted 26 October 2012 - 07:35 PM
Which is why I dont get why everyone wants or wished Jo-Han would return
Not everyone wants Jo-Han to come back, and I think almost all of us realize they probably never will, but the history of the company and its products, and the emotions and memories their products stir up and bring back have a certain value to some.
As Antonio mentioned, they had a very unique product lineup, which seems to have been a boon for them earlier on, and hinderance toward the end.












