Jump to content


jo-han molds??


  • You cannot reply to this topic
179 replies to this topic

#81 gtx6970

gtx6970

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,552 posts
  • Location:Northern Ky
  • Full Name:Bill Allphin

Posted 25 October 2012 - 03:18 PM

Makes one wonder how an accurate representation of ________ ( 1969 GTX for example) could be produced back then , but yet the current offering from AMT sucks.

I'll take all the johan kits I can get my hands on to fill the subject matter I concentrate on ( just bought an unbuilt 1962 Dodge today actually) This is about 2/3rds of what I own

Posted Image

#82 jbwelda

jbwelda

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,099 posts
  • Location:ryer island, ca
  • Full Name:William Just

Posted 25 October 2012 - 06:13 PM

art anderson sez:

> it's wise to remember that in the 1960's, kids were not enamored with model kits of AMC Ramblers, Rambler Americans, Cadillacs, full-
>sized Oldsmobiles, Studebaker Larks. Likewise, while HARD to believe today, Plymouths, Chryslers and DeSoto's were pretty low on
>the popularity scale with the kids who were the 1960's primary market for model car kits. This factor alone dictated that for the most
>part, JoHan kits were pretty low on most 12-16yr old model car builders' radar screens.

that was exactly my experience as that (lower end of) 12 - 16 model car builder back then. those sort of prototypes just were not cutting it up against 32 fords, dragsters and model Ts, and for me personally, the Revell line of rods and customs. particularly the American Motors cars...pretty low on the desirability scale back then and i tended to think the customizing accessories were hopelessly outdated. Now of course i wish i had a couple sets of those glue on "louvers" and some glue on fins and that other junk but back then i thought that stuff was dumb and looked dumber.

#83 Futurabat

Futurabat

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,797 posts
  • Location:WV
  • Full Name:Jacen Clark McCullough

Posted 25 October 2012 - 06:26 PM

Let's also not forget the popularity of non automotive subjects from the era such as universal movie monsters and the Aurora dinosaur kits.

#84 Casey

Casey

    MCM Ohana

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,980 posts
  • Location:Men. Falls, WI
  • Full Name:Casey Littmann

Posted 25 October 2012 - 06:49 PM

What could have been.


I always drew a parallel between Jo-Han and AMC, both being independents, and compared to their much larger competitors, not nearly as well funded.

I remember walking into Hobbytown Model Empire for the first time in 1992 or so, seeing some of the X-El '55 Belvedere (maybe it was the '55 Pontiac?) promos with the green tinted "glass", and wondering "Why green?"

FWIW, there was someone on ebay selling what looked to be original Jo-Han artwork a few months ago, and the seller was located in Romeo, MI. I think the Comet or Maverick artwork was one of the items, and it was not very expensive...$30 or so. I always wondered if the person had a connection with Jo-Han or not, but never thought to ask then. -_-

#85 Danno

Danno

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,176 posts
  • Location:Witness Protection.
  • Full Name:Classified.

Posted 25 October 2012 - 10:04 PM

The truth is, that like the 1948 Tucker, the missing molds were bought by shill bidders from AMT & Revell.
Then they were hidden at a ranch in Roswell, NM & later went to a storage hanger at Area 51 where they remain till this very day.....



I thought I knew a lot of the history, but that story is completely alien to me.

B)

#86 Monty

Monty

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,425 posts
  • Location:Dallas Texas
  • Full Name:Monty

Posted 26 October 2012 - 10:11 AM

I thought I knew a lot of the history, but that story is completely alien to me.

B)


All stories about Area 51 are baseless. ;)

#87 Ace-Garageguy

Ace-Garageguy

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,420 posts
  • Location:Down two, then left.
  • Full Name:Bill Engwer

Posted 26 October 2012 - 10:39 AM

Very punny.

But seriously folks, I bought a '56 Olds 98 4-dr a while back, apparently produced as a taxi in yellow plastic with green windows. Marked Johan on the bottom. I had intended to hack it up into a '55 custom. What's the deal with the thing? Both the model and the box look like they were made last week.

#88 sjordan2

sjordan2

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,830 posts
  • Location:Knoxville, TN
  • Full Name:Skip Jordan

Posted 26 October 2012 - 10:54 AM

I would suspect that many of those molds got worn out over time. For example, my original Gold Cup series Mercedes 500K kits are very sharp and precise, while the later issue is loaded with flash and not nearly as crisp, with poor chrome coverage.

#89 Monty

Monty

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,425 posts
  • Location:Dallas Texas
  • Full Name:Monty

Posted 26 October 2012 - 10:55 AM

I always drew a parallel between Jo-Han and AMC, both being independents, and compared to their much larger competitors, not nearly as well funded.


Now imagine what might've happened if Jo-Han had decided to gamble big on a project to help shed their stodgy image and improve sales prospects. They decide to kit the American Motors AMX 3 based on the anticipated sales that would accrue via the magic of exotic box art, blissfully unaware that AMC's costs of development would eventually relegate it to an engineering exercise. AMC agrees to allow them to produce the kit, but with the proviso that Jo-Han is not allowed to use outdated Rambler engines in it. Does the gambit work, or does the modeling world's lack of awareness about the real car keep it from being a success?
Posted Image

#90 Casey

Casey

    MCM Ohana

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,980 posts
  • Location:Men. Falls, WI
  • Full Name:Casey Littmann

Posted 26 October 2012 - 11:05 AM

You're kiilin' me here, Monty...though I prefer the AMX II. :wub:

Posted Image


I found the whole Seville Enterprises story pretty interesting, too, and again, we're left to wonder what might've been if that promo made it to production and Jo-Han/Seville actually had a new promo/kit in its lineup. -_-

#91 Craig Irwin

Craig Irwin

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,252 posts
  • Location:Pendleton Indiana ( near Indianapolis)

Posted 26 October 2012 - 11:39 AM

I remember walking into Hobbytown Model Empire for the first time in 1992 or so, seeing some of the X-El '55 Belvedere (maybe it was the '55 Pontiac?) promos with the green tinted "glass", and wondering "Why green?"


Because the factory tinted glass in early and mid 50's cars had a green cast to it, and over doing the % hid the lack of interior.

#92 jbwelda

jbwelda

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,099 posts
  • Location:ryer island, ca
  • Full Name:William Just

Posted 26 October 2012 - 04:21 PM

that AMX 2 is super. might have totally saved AMC if they had put it out. might have broken them too. as with JoHan vs Revell/AMT/MPC, they were kind of in a whole nother (lower) stratosphere than the big 3

#93 route66modeler

route66modeler

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,135 posts
  • Location:st.louis mo
  • Full Name:steve doing

Posted 26 October 2012 - 04:29 PM

nothing like beating a dead horse.

#94 Casey

Casey

    MCM Ohana

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,980 posts
  • Location:Men. Falls, WI
  • Full Name:Casey Littmann

Posted 26 October 2012 - 05:49 PM

Because the factory tinted glass in early and mid 50's cars had a green cast to it, and over doing the % hid the lack of interior.


That makes perfect sense. -_-

#95 martinfan5

martinfan5

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,116 posts
  • Location:Phoenix Az
  • Full Name:Jonathan Stephens

Posted 26 October 2012 - 05:51 PM

nothing like beating a dead horse.

Posted Image

#96 High octane

High octane

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,125 posts
  • Location:Midwest
  • Full Name:Nick

Posted 26 October 2012 - 06:02 PM

I was just looking at some of my unbuilt Jo-Han kits the other day and other than the body, they are rather crude, even for those times.

#97 martinfan5

martinfan5

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,116 posts
  • Location:Phoenix Az
  • Full Name:Jonathan Stephens

Posted 26 October 2012 - 06:08 PM

I was just looking at some of my unbuilt Jo-Han kits the other day and other than the body, they are rather crude, even for those times.


Which is why I dont get why everyone wants or wished Jo-Han would return

#98 Tonioseven

Tonioseven

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,630 posts
  • Location:Naples, Florida
  • Full Name:Antonio Holmes

Posted 26 October 2012 - 07:17 PM

Because of the off-the-wall subject matter.

#99 route66modeler

route66modeler

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,135 posts
  • Location:st.louis mo
  • Full Name:steve doing

Posted 26 October 2012 - 07:25 PM

your right, the chassis were pretty crude/simple. but, I contend johan's hemis were the best(stock and racing versions)!

#100 Casey

Casey

    MCM Ohana

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,980 posts
  • Location:Men. Falls, WI
  • Full Name:Casey Littmann

Posted 26 October 2012 - 07:35 PM

Which is why I dont get why everyone wants or wished Jo-Han would return


Not everyone wants Jo-Han to come back, and I think almost all of us realize they probably never will, but the history of the company and its products, and the emotions and memories their products stir up and bring back have a certain value to some.

As Antonio mentioned, they had a very unique product lineup, which seems to have been a boon for them earlier on, and hinderance toward the end.