jo-han molds??
#101
Posted 26 October 2012 - 08:23 PM
#102
Posted 26 October 2012 - 10:40 PM
Not everyone wants Jo-Han to come back, and I think almost all of us realize they probably never will, but the history of the company and its products, and the emotions and memories their products stir up and bring back have a certain value to some.
As Antonio mentioned, they had a very unique product lineup, which seems to have been a boon for them earlier on, and hinderance toward the end.
Dont think I am hating on Jo-Han, there are lot of Jo-Han kits I would like to get, but not paying the going rate, and I do have memory's as kid building the Caddy hearse /abmo kit, the Fury police car, the Caddy Eldorado kit, to me as a kid, they were good kits, and would love to get be able to do those over again.
#103
Posted 27 October 2012 - 02:08 AM
A couple of years ago I talked to my old boss from the alarm company and he told me he had that account back when it was called "Ideal Models" and he remembers John Hanley very well.
It was a bad neighbor hood even back then- And another funny thing is the address listed on the original box art, it said "17255 Moran, Detroit Michigan 48212" which is not Detroit at all-it's technically Hamtramck.
#104
Posted 27 October 2012 - 03:27 AM
But the body is what you see first, and that's where Jo-Han's stuff really shined. Some of the other parts they did were great, too:I was just looking at some of my unbuilt Jo-Han kits the other day and other than the body, they are rather crude, even for those times.
-late Oldsmobile engine (so good that Ertl cribbed it for their '69 4-4-2 kit)
-426 Hemi engine (still one of the better ones out there)
-Boss 429 engine (the best one ever done)
-Logghe Brothers early funny car chassis (still the best one ever done IMO)
-Toronado front-drive unit (the focal point of those cars; Jo-Han took the trouble to do it right)
-Hurst mag wheels (again, the best ones out there)
-Firestone Drag 500 tires and slicks (only ones out there, but Jo-Han wasn't sticking dragster slicks in their pro stock kits!)
#105
Posted 27 October 2012 - 04:05 AM
Dont think I am hating on Jo-Han, there are lot of Jo-Han kits I would like to get, but not paying the going rate, and I do have memory's as kid building the Caddy hearse /abmo kit, the Fury police car, the Caddy Eldorado kit, to me as a kid, they were good kits, and would love to get be able to do those over again.
Ahh, but you can, Grasshopper.
I know a very excellent source who happens to have them all.
Check for today's market prices.
#106
Posted 27 October 2012 - 05:33 AM
And another funny thing is the address listed on the original box art, it said "17255 Moran, Detroit Michigan 48212" which is not Detroit at all-it's technically Hamtramck.
I noticed that when I Google mapped the address a few years ago. I think they may have listed "Moran Ave." as the road name, too, when it's Moran Street...unless that changed at some point?
Thanks for sharing that story, Chris.
#107
Posted 27 October 2012 - 09:54 AM
Ahh, but you can, Grasshopper.
![]()
I know a very excellent source who happens to have them all.![]()
Check for today's market prices.
I am pretty sure I know who the seller is you are talking about Chief
#108
Posted 27 October 2012 - 12:22 PM
#109
Posted 27 October 2012 - 12:51 PM
#110
Posted 28 October 2012 - 06:29 AM
#111
Posted 28 October 2012 - 07:16 AM
but then there were ones like the full detail Chrysler Turbine. There's nothing crude about that kit. It's as detailed and fiddly as any that are out there now.
I have to agree. Turbine Car is really great kit and builds parts fit is very nice, too. Same thing with '72 Torino Oval Track Racer, parts are nice and there are pretty much of them, in chassis too! How about those Funny Car kits, that Jo-Han has produced, what's the quality of them?
#112
Posted 28 October 2012 - 07:21 AM
Not all of their kits were crude. Some of them were barely above promos, but then there were ones like the full detail Chrysler Turbine. There's nothing crude about that kit. It's as detailed and fiddly as any that are out there now.
The 1931 Cadillacs are very nice, too. Someday, mine will all be built.
Charlie Larkin
#113
Posted 28 October 2012 - 07:24 AM
#114
Posted 28 October 2012 - 07:36 AM
#115
Posted 28 October 2012 - 08:27 AM
There you go. Cherry pick the best stuff and sell them as kit accesories.
I sugested just that to Okey years ago, sort of a plastic resin kit if you will.
#116
Posted 28 October 2012 - 09:09 AM
Would I like to see Jo-Han come back?
NOPE, I wouldn't want to see that.
We could chase our tails in circles until we turn into butter-but JoHan aint never coming back. Once the name went to SeVille - the original JoHan company was done and gone.
I was really hoping Okey could revive the name and bring back all those classic kits....and he gave it a valiant effort, but due to circumstances beyond his control it didn't come to be. I'm sure he wanted it to succeed as much or more than we did.
Look at Schwinn bicycles-once the company left Chicago and sent the company operations all over the globe, not to mention they are sold at Wal-Mart now instead of a once exclusive Schwinn dealerships-the classic bikes from the '50 to the '70s are worth more to than the new ones . They were only "Made in Chicago" that one time in history...and the way it's looking they aren't coming back any time soon (to Chicago)
I didn't start out as a model collector, but over the years it happens. I have more kits than I could build in a life time but still have to get a copy or two of all the new kits coming out. I'm glad that there were people back then that had the same problem and we still find vintage/mint in the box kits today.
They were only "Jo-Han" kits once, trying to replicate them would be as disappointing as the re-make of the Munsters.........
#117
Posted 28 October 2012 - 10:17 AM
#118
Posted 28 October 2012 - 01:12 PM
How about those Funny Car kits, that Jo-Han has produced, what's the quality of them?
I have the 71-73 Mustang and Pinto funny cars and they are very good, better than AMT was doing at the same period. The only thing that is odd is that the rear axle is tremendously out of scale, it looks like it came from a semi truck, but everything else is great.
#119
Posted 29 October 2012 - 04:46 AM
#120
Posted 29 October 2012 - 05:24 AM
I will put their 1935 Mercedes 500K up against anything being marketed today.
Quite right. It's an excellent kit and I for one am wondering how that happened?
On a side note if anyone has a '60 Desoto Adventurer kit in any condition and are willing to part with it please give me a holler.
Edited by Jantrix, 29 October 2012 - 05:26 AM.












