[quote name='davezinn' date='14 July 2010 - 09:35 AM' timestamp='1279132534' post='334776']
one of the things that bothers me and maybe someone can explain, the NNL is supposed to be a non-competitive event right? in this case it's just a "show" not a contest. if it is indeed supposed to be not a contest and non-competitive then why is it exactly opposite of that or did it change at some point?
8888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888
Dave...glad you asked. As some of you know, both Andy Martin and I were participants in that first ever NNL at Tom's garage in the summer, 1980. We didn't call it an NNL to start with....the name "
National Nameless Luminaries"...or "
Nameless National Luminaries" (we never decided one was better than the other) actually was dreamed up during the afternoon as someone mentioned Mark's contest, and we looked up the Putty Thrower column with the infamous quote...and well...it all sprang from there.
NNL's as orginally concieved were 100% non-competitive, and that's how, in the view of most of the people at that first ever event, they should remain. We've reached an accomodation of sorts that a best theme, best junior, and people's choice award, all voted by participants only (no judges), lies within the spirit of the NNL idea, although to be candid we wish those would go away too. Actually, we had no awards at NNL's until about 4-5 years into it when there was a change in the group taking the lead in the organization of the contest. And we never had any trouble attracting ever-growing crowds when there were no awards.
All of this and much more about the origins of the NNL and how we need to get back to that are spelled out in an op-ed/pseudo guest editorial I sent to Gregg and Harry a few months back; hopefully it will appear in print soon.
Best regards everyone - and remember TRUE NNLS ARE NOT CONTESTS - NEVER HAVE BEEN, NEVER WILL BE! TIM BOYD
Edited by tim boyd, 15 July 2010 - 03:40 PM.