

Corvette power trains with V/W turnsignals and tailights
Posted 17 June 2011 - 07:26 AM


Posted 17 June 2011 - 07:42 AM
The Zimmers are a ripoff of the "original" Neo Classic designed by Brooks Stevens....
Posted 17 June 2011 - 11:24 AM
Which in itself was a ripoff of the real classic car designs of the 30s...
so no credit to Brooks Stevens for being original...
Edited by MIKE THE MANIAC, 17 June 2011 - 11:25 AM.
Posted 17 June 2011 - 12:10 PM
"The idea was a "contemporary classic," a new car that looked like the Mercedes SSK that Stevens once owned.
Posted 17 June 2011 - 01:47 PM
Yeah, I get that. But to complain that Zimmer ripped off Brooks Stevens make no sense, when Brooks Stevens himself ripped off Mercedes to begin with!
Why is Brooks Stevens' Mercedes ripoff any more legitimate than Zimmer's Brooks Stevens ripoff?
Edited by MIKE THE MANIAC, 17 June 2011 - 01:55 PM.
Posted 17 June 2011 - 02:26 PM
Because Brooks came up with the Idea......as I lived 4 houses away...
Posted 17 June 2011 - 04:12 PM
Posted 18 June 2011 - 05:06 AM
Posted 18 June 2011 - 05:24 AM
I don't see any "rip-off" intentions behind those or any other kit car or manufactured replica that's come along, from the Porsche 550 Spyder to the 8/10 Cord, McLaren, Cobras, etc. Perhaps the biggest "rip-off" problem was with the Miami Vice Daytona Spyder, which got the manufacturers in LOTS of trouble with Ferrari, and another builder of a 250 GTO replica was similarly sued.
Posted 18 June 2011 - 08:38 AM
Edited by MIKE THE MANIAC, 18 June 2011 - 08:47 AM.
Posted 18 June 2011 - 08:40 AM
Posted 18 June 2011 - 08:52 AM
Why waste energy arguing about trashy cars?
Posted 18 June 2011 - 08:54 AM
Why waste energy arguing about trashy cars?
Posted 18 June 2011 - 09:02 AM
YOUR ALWAYS CORRECT HARRY....
![]()
If you knew the real story...you would not defend the Zimmer family.........
I really do not care if you like or dislike the car..you missed my point as always and wish to argue....
" So my point was, if Zimmer stole from Stevens, as Mike implied, then surely Stevens stole from Mercedes"
It was sold as a NEO CLASSIC......NOT A MERCEDES.......The Zimmer was made to take customers away from the market that Excaliber found and filled,
On the other hand the Excaliber was not made to take away Mercedes customers.
Posted 18 June 2011 - 09:38 AM
I will now.
My gripe is that both Stevens and Zimmer strayed so far from the class and style of the original, and drove their blechmobiles off the cliff crashing into crassville.
Posted 18 June 2011 - 10:03 AM
I will now.
My gripe is that both Stevens and Zimmer strayed so far from the class and style of the original, and drove their blechmobiles off the cliff crashing into crassville.
Posted 18 June 2011 - 10:48 AM
Ed Zachary.
The original Excalibur wasn't the disgusting neoclassic that emerged still wearing the name long after the SSK re-creation. That others were compelled to also join in the fray of obnoxious neoclassics...well, that's some pretty head-shaking herd mentality for you!
And to pour salt into the wound, what is left of Zimmer is nothing like the car that was featured this week. Straight back to crassville they went.
Posted 19 June 2011 - 03:42 AM
Posted 19 June 2011 - 06:54 AM