Jump to content


57 Thunderbird chassis


  • You cannot reply to this topic
8 replies to this topic

#1 Rob McKee

Rob McKee

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 848 posts
  • Location:Coquitlam BC
  • Full Name:Rob McKee

Posted 13 February 2012 - 02:29 PM

Hi all,

I am going to be taking on a 57 Ford Thunderbird AMT kit. I am sure some of you are aware that the chassis on this kit is not the best with the exhaust and drive train molded in.

Any suggestion on a good replacement I can kit bash from?

#2 MrObsessive

MrObsessive

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,901 posts
  • Location:Steelton, PA

Posted 13 February 2012 - 02:53 PM

You can try AMT's '56, although looking at the chassis it's a little on the big side. Or it could be that the '57 kit is not exactly 1/25.

I'd love to see a new tool '57 T-Bird, but I doubt that's going to happen.

#3 Chuck Most

Chuck Most

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,250 posts
  • Location:Ithaca, MI
  • Full Name:Charles Donald Eric Richard Jules Kasim Most

Posted 13 February 2012 - 03:00 PM

You could try the '56 AMT chassis, but the engine in the '56 is just short of junk. Proportions are iffy, and it has a kind of 'unfinished' look.

#4 Bob Turner

Bob Turner

    MCM Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 67 posts
  • Location:USA
  • Full Name:Bob Turner

Posted 13 February 2012 - 03:24 PM

I agree on using the AMT 56 Thunderbird chassis, though it is a tad bigger, (& as mentioned the 57 might be a tad undersized, AMT had a few kits that way in the so called "Golden Age" of the hobby), & will need some trimming to get it to fit. That's in the plans when I tackle my build of the 57, & I have both kits at the ready for the conversion.

I also agree with Chuck on the shortcomings of the engine in the 56 Thunderbird. If you have an AMT 56 or 57 Ford kit handy, the engines in those kits, albeit from older tooling, offer a better alternative to the 57 or 56 Thunderbird engines. Kit bashing the best parts from the 56/57 Thunderbird engines with the 56 or 57 Ford engines will give you an excellent basis for a nicely built engine.

#5 62rebel

62rebel

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,469 posts
  • Location:CHARLESTON SC

Posted 13 February 2012 - 03:41 PM

be aware that the Thunderbirds used rear sump oil pans when you're converting the "full-size" Y-blocks from the '56-'57 kits. also, the distributor on a Y-block exits the top rear of the block at an angle, not straight up.

#6 Chuck Most

Chuck Most

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,250 posts
  • Location:Ithaca, MI
  • Full Name:Charles Donald Eric Richard Jules Kasim Most

Posted 13 February 2012 - 03:50 PM

be aware that the Thunderbirds used rear sump oil pans when you're converting the "full-size" Y-blocks from the '56-'57 kits. also, the distributor on a Y-block exits the top rear of the block at an angle, not straight up.

YES! EVERY Y-block kit has gotten that wrong. The distributor is angled a few degrees to the passenger's side.

#7 Eshaver

Eshaver

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,871 posts
  • Location:Richmond Virginia for now
  • Full Name:Ed Shaver

Posted 14 February 2012 - 10:42 AM

Try looking at the Revell 1956 Ford F-100 truck kit as a powerplant alternative ........... Ed Shaver

#8 Darin Bastedo

Darin Bastedo

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,553 posts
  • Location:Kingsport TN

Posted 14 February 2012 - 07:15 PM

one other problem with the 56 t-bird is the interior and engine compartment is too deep and the frame rails of the chassis are visible below the rocker panels. this shouldn't be the case. the bottom of the frame rail should be even with te bottom of the rocker panel.

#9 Swifster

Swifster

    MCM Avid Poster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 425 posts
  • Location:Lakeland, FL
  • Full Name:Tom Allen

Posted 15 February 2012 - 01:27 PM

It'll be interesting to see how correct the Y-Block will be in the new tool '57 Ford.