Revell '50 Oldsmobile Club Coupe 2'n1
#361
Posted 18 October 2012 - 03:21 AM
#362
Posted 20 October 2012 - 04:27 PM
#363
Posted 22 October 2012 - 01:15 PM
#364
Posted 22 October 2012 - 03:22 PM
#365
Posted 23 October 2012 - 02:32 AM
As far as the false advertising thing goes, mistakes happen. They probably intended to do them that way then found it problematic from a production standpoint, and the change was missed in the art department. I'm sure it'll be corrected on the next run.
#366
Posted 23 October 2012 - 02:38 AM
#367
Posted 23 October 2012 - 03:18 AM
Revell screws up every so often with the box art (remember the pic of the stock grille on the '48 Ford coupe kit that looks nothing like the stock '48 grille and is nowhere to be found in the kit?). But honestly I didn't even notice the mention of printed whitewalls until you pointed it out.
Let's not forget the"68 Corvette that had a 429 either! That was a classic! I honestly hadn't noticed where the box stated tampo printed tires,but then I don't pay a lot of attention to box art. I wouldn't use the tires anyway as they look too big and wide for a 1950 Olds.
#368
Posted 23 October 2012 - 03:29 AM
#369
Posted 23 October 2012 - 06:51 AM
At least it isn't as bad as the twilight years of RC2- who remembers the '70 Dodge Daytona kit with the '68 Roadrunner chassis, K-H 'recall' wheels, and what appeared to be a few scratchbuilt underhood details... none of which came with the kit? Or the most recent reissue of the '60 Apache fleetside, which showed the old SMP longbed version with side trim, not the short bed, sans side trim version the kit builds into. That certainly isn't misleading or anything.Let's not forget the"68 Corvette that had a 429 either! That was a classic! I honestly hadn't noticed where the box stated tampo printed tires,but then I don't pay a lot of attention to box art. I wouldn't use the tires anyway as they look too big and wide for a 1950 Olds.
#370
Posted 23 October 2012 - 02:23 PM
#371
Posted 23 October 2012 - 05:52 PM
Can someone please tell us a bit about the carb and aircleaner that comes with this kit?
The carb is a Rochester AA 2 barrel that was used for 49 and 50. Most places call it a backdraft carb but it seems to work like a regular downdraft 2 barrel except for the air entering from the back. The air cleaner is an old style oil bath filter. Here is thread from the H.A.M.B. that has a ton of Olds Rocket stuff, http://www.jalopyjou...ad.php?t=149650
#372
Posted 26 October 2012 - 11:36 AM
Is anyone else upset over the fact that Revell says Tampo printed tires on the box but does not actually have them in the kit? It may be a small thing but I know people who bought the Gremlin kit from AMT just to get the slicks that were included. This seems to be false advertising and I've yet to see any explanation/apology for this oversight. In the kit, decals are provided for the whitewalls. but I thought Tampo printing put the lettering/whitewall directly on the tire. I have seen several theories advanced as to why they are not Tampo printed, but I still feel it was wrong to put the kit out with the claim of Tampo printed tires on the box.
I suspect the Tampo print didn't work out the way they were designed, so as a quality move they "upgraded" at expense. False advertising, I think they have the right to change parts as they want to...Call Angie on the 800 # she might give you some insite. Me I want about 6 of these!
#373
Posted 28 October 2012 - 07:17 AM
#374
Posted 28 October 2012 - 08:47 AM

I guess it wasn't known he did this body in 2001 based on the Ertl diecast?:

Worth paging through: http://public.fotki....l-1950-oldsmob/
Does anyone know when Tom's 88 Fastback body/conversion will be available for use with the Revell kit?
#375
Posted 28 October 2012 - 09:30 AM
I get updates from Tom via Fotki- he ususally posts stuff as he makes progress. I'd say just keep an eye on that link.
#376
Posted 28 October 2012 - 10:56 AM
Is anyone else upset over the fact that Revell says Tampo printed tires on the box but does not actually have them in the kit? It may be a small thing but I know people who bought the Gremlin kit from AMT just to get the slicks that were included. This seems to be false advertising and I've yet to see any explanation/apology for this oversight. In the kit, decals are provided for the whitewalls. but I thought Tampo printing put the lettering/whitewall directly on the tire. I have seen several theories advanced as to why they are not Tampo printed, but I still feel it was wrong to put the kit out with the claim of Tampo printed tires on the box.
You're really upset?
False advertising? Really? Anyone who buys this kit ONLY because the box indicates tampo-printed tires are inside ... is entitled to a refund.
I'll guarantee it for Revell. Any consumer who is truly upset by this slight error, simply send me the kit and your receipt, postpaid, and I'll send you some money.
Major problem solved.
#377
Posted 28 October 2012 - 10:59 AM
Edited by Rob Hall, 28 October 2012 - 10:59 AM.
#378
Posted 28 October 2012 - 11:44 AM
Really?
G
#379
Posted 28 October 2012 - 12:33 PM
Anyway, here are his comments, edited slightly just to keep things short and sweet.
The problem then became, does Revell do the first version as a sedan to satisfy the folks wanting a dead-on accurate sedan to do the McGriff car? Or a coupe with the possibility of dozens of spin-offs? The decision was finally made that Revell would take the heat to do the markings for one of the most famous American race cars with historic legacy. The other move was to provide Tom Coolidge (one of the most knowledgeable early Olds experts) with two of the first final test shots. I can tell you that Tom Coolidge does plan to do the resin sedan conversion as soon as he can lay his hands on a production '50 Olds kit.
I get updates from Tom via Fotki- he ususally posts stuff as he makes progress. I'd say just keep an eye on that link.
Kind of interesting that he only sold one of the Fastback 88 bodies when first made. I wonder if Tom plans to start an all new master instead of using the body he did a decade ago? I guess we'll wait and find out.
#380
Posted 31 October 2012 - 05:56 AM
The rear fender decals say LABOR DAY STEP. 4, whereas Len's 1:1 reference shows it should be SEPT. 4
Just a little knife work should fix that.
Edited by sjordan2, 31 October 2012 - 06:10 AM.












