What the new Charger could have been...
Posted 01 August 2007 - 07:28 PM
Posted 02 August 2007 - 10:04 AM
Posted 03 August 2007 - 02:53 AM
Harry, I just looked at your posting from 7/17. (I don't look at all of the headings all that often) We are thinking the exact same way. I have started to build almost this exact same car. I converted the 4 dr to a 2 dr. and was planning almost the same front end treatment (which is taken from the beautiful 68/69 design). My rear end design uses the 69 Charger style tail lights rather then the lights that Chrysler chose. Now I will have to move the build up on this one as I want to see it finished after seeing your great rendering of what Dodge should have done.
I'm looking forward to seeing the finished model!
Posted 23 October 2007 - 07:55 AM
Posted 24 November 2010 - 05:25 AM
i do like the drawing though
Posted 24 November 2010 - 10:00 AM
Posted 30 November 2010 - 04:10 PM
Posted 18 February 2011 - 01:27 PM
Posted 30 April 2011 - 06:21 AM
A thought i have i think the Car is short enough to be a hardtop . Don't get me wrong i like what you did with the car.
and if one did not roll the car the added support won't be needed.
Posted 30 April 2011 - 05:03 PM
Posted 20 May 2011 - 11:39 PM
Edited by Demon9115, 20 May 2011 - 11:40 PM.
Posted 21 May 2011 - 05:08 AM
Love the concepts. Totally agree with everyone. That's what the Charger should have been
Posted 27 May 2011 - 03:21 PM
all they really are if you think about it is an chrysler 300c rearend with an intrepid front end and charger badging slapped on with a rear wheel drive and a hemi with an "auto" matic basically thats all they consist of!
Posted 28 May 2011 - 06:32 AM