BAD or GOOD "BADMAN"?
#1
Posted 28 August 2012 - 01:24 AM
http://www.modelroun...-p/rmx-4904.htm
Has anyone reviewed it here?
#2
Posted 28 August 2012 - 02:03 AM
Michaelj...
#3
Posted 28 August 2012 - 02:13 AM
#4
Posted 28 August 2012 - 02:45 AM
#5
Posted 28 August 2012 - 03:25 AM
it's no Tamiya or Hasegawa by a loooong shot, but i can almost guarantee it won't end up languishing half-built in the bottom of the closet because it was too complicated. these are BUILDER'S kits.
#6
Posted 28 August 2012 - 03:26 AM
Even though it's totally wrong as an "accurate" gasser (and what is class is D/MS anyway?), it's a still a fun kit to build and it looks cool when completed. Still one of my faves from my early days of model building. And the box art is killer.
Neil, I like your open assessment of the kit. My interest in it is simply to use the parts to modify and build perhaps a more accurate 55 phantom gassers.
#7
Posted 28 August 2012 - 04:29 AM
My interest in it is simply to use the parts to modify and build perhaps a more accurate 55 phantom gassers.
The problem with using the Badman kit to build more accurate '55 gassers might be that it is 24th scale and virtually all the other '55 Chevy kits are 25th. As inaccurate as it is, I do have a soft spot for this kit and it's predecessor, Monogram's '55 BelAir Customizing Kit from the early '60s.
One thing that I think would help the look of the body on the Badman is some careful reshaping of the side window opening.
#8
Posted 28 August 2012 - 04:39 AM
#9
Posted 28 August 2012 - 04:51 AM
My interest in it is simply to use the parts to modify and build perhaps a more accurate 55 phantom gassers.
You might want to pass on the Badman kit, Virgil. The kit includes some decent American 200-S "Daisy" mags for use with the rear slicks (which aren't all that great), but the headers/exhaust manifolds and collectors are complete fantasy. The bucket seats are very '60s, but the rest of the interior (tub, dash) is straight from the original Monogram hardtop/convertible kit from 1964(?). The engine details aren't all that great, either, but the straight front axle is decent.
#10
Posted 28 August 2012 - 05:11 AM
#11
Posted 28 August 2012 - 05:50 AM
I intend to use mine with the 1/24 Revell '53 Chevy Coupe to make a wicked gasser.
I think this would be a good canvas for some of your wicked paint jobs, but as for realism, probably not your best bet. Remember this IS a Tom Daniels design so it's gonna be a little outrageous.
#12
Posted 28 August 2012 - 08:05 AM
And yes, I have an unbuilt earlier reissue on my shelf. It sits right next to a reissue of the "S'cool Bus".
#13
Posted 28 August 2012 - 09:18 AM
#14
Posted 28 August 2012 - 10:10 AM
#15
Posted 28 August 2012 - 10:27 AM
It's meant for kids. Totally inaccurate in almost every way. Typical Monogram Tom Daniel "toy" model kit.
Technically, this kit isn't a Tom Daniel-designed kit, but more accurately, modified by Tom Daniel. This is not one of his whimsical, not based in reality show rods, but rather based on the original 1/24 Monogram '55 Chevy kit:
The body has a chopped top and radiused rear wheel arches, but the body is otherwise close to stock.
#16
Posted 28 August 2012 - 12:39 PM
#17
Posted 28 August 2012 - 12:55 PM
That's what it's ALL about, F U N !Good lord what hate. If ya wanna build a perfect period gasser, ya need to bash a bunch of parts. If ya want a super huge fun project for the weekend, this is it! I got carried away circa 1970, built it out of box, with a bunch of detail. Even kept the red windows. I was rewarded with first place in a King Norman's contest. Still after all the years, this might have been the most fun ever.
#18
Posted 28 August 2012 - 01:04 PM
#19
Posted 28 August 2012 - 02:16 PM
#20
Posted 28 August 2012 - 02:42 PM
I don't care how accurate it is,, or isn't. It's part of my youth
And the box art is just to cool












