Jump to content


What Revell should put out as Kits...


  • You cannot reply to this topic
191 replies to this topic

#41 Darin Bastedo

Darin Bastedo

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,961 posts
  • Location:Kingsport TN

Posted 01 September 2012 - 07:47 AM

You guys should cut Revell some slack. Due to a typo on an internal memo, we almost got Fosse Designed kits.

Posted Image

#42 lanesteele240

lanesteele240

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 629 posts
  • Location:north carolina
  • Full Name:Gary Steen

Posted 01 September 2012 - 08:14 AM

with CNC machines, a new too could be cut out in a week. especially if outsourced to Korea or China

Edited by lanesteele240, 01 September 2012 - 08:15 AM.


#43 Ace-Garageguy

Ace-Garageguy

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,406 posts
  • Location:Down two, then left.
  • Full Name:Bill Engwer

Posted 01 September 2012 - 08:34 AM

with CNC machines, a new too could be cut out in a week. especially if outsourced to Korea or China


Yup....glad someone made this point, although we in the States have every bit the capability to cut a tool quickly. And I'm still in the dark as to why so much tooling is outsourced overseas, because in the overall scheme of things, the actual cutting-of-the-tool cost is rather insignificant, in my mind at least, compared to the benefit to the product and market positioning that "proudly tooled in America" on the box could add. I'd pay a little more for that, frankly.

BUT, the final CNC machining of the tool depends entirely on the competence of the team that interprets any necessary design changes to portray the Foose version, imparts accurately to the CAD guys what the scope and desired outcome of the tool-changes will be, and quickly assembles and evaluates test-shots to provide feedback to fine-tune the tooling. This must be where the tremendous time-lag between the 'coming to a hobby store near you' announcement and the actual availability of the kits usually comes in.

#44 mrmike

mrmike

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,493 posts
  • Location:Nashua, NH USA
  • Full Name:Michael R. Siesicki

Posted 01 September 2012 - 09:42 AM

The reality is Revell will not tool up a whole new kit when they have a perfectly good model kit tooling on the shelf. They will tool new wheels and maybe new tires and suspension pieces along any other specific parts to satisfy Chip's requirements. Beyond that, it will be the same kit that is available now. CAD/CAM and CNC machining costs money and Revell needs a good business plan before they invest the money and go ahead with new tooling and packaging for the Foose kits. Not only that, but Chip will want his piece of the pie before the product hits the shelf with his name on it. These kits are a marketing tool with new episodes of Overhaulin' coming in October and older episodes running on Velocity Channel right now.

#45 GMP440

GMP440

    MCM Friend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 208 posts
  • Location:Florida

Posted 01 September 2012 - 05:27 PM

Instead of reissuing the same kits again, I would love to see Revell come out with a 68' Coronet R/T and also
a 70' Dodge Charger R/T. Lets develope new tools instead of rereleasing the same thing year after year.

#46 CEKPETHO BCE

CEKPETHO BCE

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 582 posts
  • Location:Toronto, Canada
  • Full Name:Andrey

Posted 01 September 2012 - 06:46 PM

I see this thread is mostly about Chip Foose, but I would love it if Revell put out a 39 Lincoln Zephyr coupe... or any other company for that matter.

#47 PatRedmond

PatRedmond

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,437 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario.

Posted 02 September 2012 - 04:13 AM

with CNC machines, a new too could be cut out in a week. especially if outsourced to Korea or China



All well and good, but it's STILL very expensive. Return On Investment would be poor on a new tool with limited interest.

#48 Danno

Danno

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,164 posts
  • Location:Witness Protection.
  • Full Name:Classified.

Posted 02 September 2012 - 04:32 AM

Isn't he the guy who invented Foosball?

;)

#49 Deathgoblin

Deathgoblin

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 657 posts
  • Location:Columbus, OH
  • Full Name:Brian Wilson

Posted 02 September 2012 - 04:55 AM

A Fosse kit could've been funny. Jazz Hands! :)

#50 jaydar

jaydar

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 626 posts
  • Location:chicago, il U.S.A.
  • Full Name:Joseph J. Taylor

Posted 02 September 2012 - 05:01 AM

If this is not a Foose-only thread, my choices are
68 Muztang conv
71 mustang
1/12 cobra 427

#51 sjordan2

sjordan2

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,816 posts
  • Location:Knoxville, TN
  • Full Name:Skip Jordan

Posted 02 September 2012 - 07:41 AM

If you missed it, the podcast that Casey posted the other day is very pertinent to this topic - Ed Sexton and Roger Harney interview (the product guys from Revell).

http://www.modelcars...showtopic=63193

Edited by sjordan2, 02 September 2012 - 07:41 AM.


#52 Greg Myers

Greg Myers

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,569 posts
  • Location:Phoenix, AZ
  • Full Name:Gregory Myers

Posted 02 September 2012 - 08:35 AM

That may be. But he doesn't strike me as the kind of guy who cares. And if Revell can increase sales by doing some Foosed up kits, I'm all for it.

That may be. But he doesn't strike me as the kind of guy who cares. And if Revell can increase sales by doing some Foosed up kits, I'm all for it.

Yep Ford tried that back in the day. Shelbied up Mustangs ? Posted Image One would hope you'd get more than just the foose decals.

#53 blueoval92

blueoval92

    MCM Avid Poster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 261 posts
  • Location:Louisiana
  • Full Name:jonathan delhommer

Posted 02 September 2012 - 08:58 AM

either revell or ( preferably AMT) should do a kit for Troy Trepanier's Chicayne. 1962 Chevy Biscayne hot rodded.

Attached File  chicayne_07.jpg   70.36K   15 downloads

Attached File  1962_Chevrolet_Chicayne_18_detail.jpg   78.16K   12 downloads

Edited by blueoval92, 02 September 2012 - 09:04 AM.


#54 B.DougBeck

B.DougBeck

    MCM Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 50 posts
  • Location:Texas
  • Full Name:Doug Beck

Posted 02 September 2012 - 08:58 AM

I would like to see the following.

Current V8 super cars
1970 Charger
1969 Roadrunner
1972 GranTorino
Australian Falcon coupe, I like the XAs
302 Maverick
Shelby Daytona coupe

#55 Michigan Madman

Michigan Madman

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,119 posts
  • Location:Michiganistan
  • Full Name:Chuck Most

Posted 02 September 2012 - 09:33 AM

Yes, we know that, but it's running down. ALREADY these proposed Foose releases are late. Yes, they'll sell some, but Revell is late on a trend. Again. Much like AMT's 'Coddington' Series.

I don't know- I think AMT's Coddington kits were right on the ball as far as timing. The downside was that, well, the features they added to the kits just plain sucked for the most part. In this case I'm not too worried, when Revell adds new parts to an existing kit they tend not to 'half heart' it the way RC2 did.

#56 Casey

Casey

    MCM Ohana

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,963 posts
  • Location:Men. Falls, WI
  • Full Name:Casey Littmann

Posted 02 September 2012 - 09:57 AM

Yes, we know that, but it's running down. ALREADY these proposed Foose releases are late. Yes, they'll sell some, but Revell is late on a trend. Again. Much like AMT's 'Coddington' Series.


There may be perfectly good reasons for Revell's perceived "lateness", and their timing couldn't be better if the '68 Firebird kits hits store shelves the last week of September-- one week before the new season of Overhaulin' premieres on TV. ;)

#57 Casey

Casey

    MCM Ohana

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,963 posts
  • Location:Men. Falls, WI
  • Full Name:Casey Littmann

Posted 02 September 2012 - 09:59 AM

I don't know- I think AMT's Coddington kits were right on the ball as far as timing. The downside was that, well, the features they added to the kits just plain sucked for the most part. In this case I'm not too worried, when Revell adds new parts to an existing kit they tend not to 'half heart' it the way RC2 did.


I don't think any of the 1/25 kits matched anything Boyd's company built in 1:1, did they? I think the accurate replicas were done by Testors (Alumacoupe, Chezoom, Boydster, etc.) a few years before AMT jumped in.

#58 Deathgoblin

Deathgoblin

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 657 posts
  • Location:Columbus, OH
  • Full Name:Brian Wilson

Posted 02 September 2012 - 11:01 AM

maybe some oddballs, like a 59 Buick Invicta or a 61 Plymouth?

#59 PatRedmond

PatRedmond

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,437 posts
  • Location:Windsor, Ontario.

Posted 02 September 2012 - 02:16 PM

There may be perfectly good reasons for Revell's perceived "lateness", and their timing couldn't be better if the '68 Firebird kits hits store shelves the last week of September-- one week before the new season of Overhaulin' premieres on TV. ;)


That will sell some I guess, but I still think Chip's popularity is waning. 2 years ago would have been better.

#60 slusher

slusher

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,486 posts
  • Location:tennessee
  • Full Name:carl slusher

Posted 03 September 2012 - 01:14 AM

I've always liked Foose builds better than Coddington garbage.


l agree with that Jim. Revell has put out so many new special adidtion kit and for the price and quality l would have to say they have the biggest american market. l have to give them the benefit of dought.