What Revell should put out as Kits...
#41
Posted 01 September 2012 - 07:47 AM
#42
Posted 01 September 2012 - 08:14 AM
Edited by lanesteele240, 01 September 2012 - 08:15 AM.
#43
Posted 01 September 2012 - 08:34 AM
with CNC machines, a new too could be cut out in a week. especially if outsourced to Korea or China
Yup....glad someone made this point, although we in the States have every bit the capability to cut a tool quickly. And I'm still in the dark as to why so much tooling is outsourced overseas, because in the overall scheme of things, the actual cutting-of-the-tool cost is rather insignificant, in my mind at least, compared to the benefit to the product and market positioning that "proudly tooled in America" on the box could add. I'd pay a little more for that, frankly.
BUT, the final CNC machining of the tool depends entirely on the competence of the team that interprets any necessary design changes to portray the Foose version, imparts accurately to the CAD guys what the scope and desired outcome of the tool-changes will be, and quickly assembles and evaluates test-shots to provide feedback to fine-tune the tooling. This must be where the tremendous time-lag between the 'coming to a hobby store near you' announcement and the actual availability of the kits usually comes in.
#44
Posted 01 September 2012 - 09:42 AM
#45
Posted 01 September 2012 - 05:27 PM
a 70' Dodge Charger R/T. Lets develope new tools instead of rereleasing the same thing year after year.
#46
Posted 01 September 2012 - 06:46 PM
#47
Posted 02 September 2012 - 04:13 AM
with CNC machines, a new too could be cut out in a week. especially if outsourced to Korea or China
All well and good, but it's STILL very expensive. Return On Investment would be poor on a new tool with limited interest.
#48
Posted 02 September 2012 - 04:32 AM
#49
Posted 02 September 2012 - 04:55 AM
#50
Posted 02 September 2012 - 05:01 AM
68 Muztang conv
71 mustang
1/12 cobra 427
#51
Posted 02 September 2012 - 07:41 AM
http://www.modelcars...showtopic=63193
Edited by sjordan2, 02 September 2012 - 07:41 AM.
#52
Posted 02 September 2012 - 08:35 AM
That may be. But he doesn't strike me as the kind of guy who cares. And if Revell can increase sales by doing some Foosed up kits, I'm all for it.
Yep Ford tried that back in the day. Shelbied up Mustangs ?That may be. But he doesn't strike me as the kind of guy who cares. And if Revell can increase sales by doing some Foosed up kits, I'm all for it.
One would hope you'd get more than just the foose decals.
#53
Posted 02 September 2012 - 08:58 AM
chicayne_07.jpg 70.36K
15 downloads
1962_Chevrolet_Chicayne_18_detail.jpg 78.16K
12 downloads
Edited by blueoval92, 02 September 2012 - 09:04 AM.
#54
Posted 02 September 2012 - 08:58 AM
Current V8 super cars
1970 Charger
1969 Roadrunner
1972 GranTorino
Australian Falcon coupe, I like the XAs
302 Maverick
Shelby Daytona coupe
#55
Posted 02 September 2012 - 09:33 AM
I don't know- I think AMT's Coddington kits were right on the ball as far as timing. The downside was that, well, the features they added to the kits just plain sucked for the most part. In this case I'm not too worried, when Revell adds new parts to an existing kit they tend not to 'half heart' it the way RC2 did.Yes, we know that, but it's running down. ALREADY these proposed Foose releases are late. Yes, they'll sell some, but Revell is late on a trend. Again. Much like AMT's 'Coddington' Series.
#56
Posted 02 September 2012 - 09:57 AM
Yes, we know that, but it's running down. ALREADY these proposed Foose releases are late. Yes, they'll sell some, but Revell is late on a trend. Again. Much like AMT's 'Coddington' Series.
There may be perfectly good reasons for Revell's perceived "lateness", and their timing couldn't be better if the '68 Firebird kits hits store shelves the last week of September-- one week before the new season of Overhaulin' premieres on TV.
#57
Posted 02 September 2012 - 09:59 AM
I don't know- I think AMT's Coddington kits were right on the ball as far as timing. The downside was that, well, the features they added to the kits just plain sucked for the most part. In this case I'm not too worried, when Revell adds new parts to an existing kit they tend not to 'half heart' it the way RC2 did.
I don't think any of the 1/25 kits matched anything Boyd's company built in 1:1, did they? I think the accurate replicas were done by Testors (Alumacoupe, Chezoom, Boydster, etc.) a few years before AMT jumped in.
#58
Posted 02 September 2012 - 11:01 AM
#59
Posted 02 September 2012 - 02:16 PM
There may be perfectly good reasons for Revell's perceived "lateness", and their timing couldn't be better if the '68 Firebird kits hits store shelves the last week of September-- one week before the new season of Overhaulin' premieres on TV.
That will sell some I guess, but I still think Chip's popularity is waning. 2 years ago would have been better.
#60
Posted 03 September 2012 - 01:14 AM
I've always liked Foose builds better than Coddington garbage.
l agree with that Jim. Revell has put out so many new special adidtion kit and for the price and quality l would have to say they have the biggest american market. l have to give them the benefit of dought.












