I wish they were easily available. One notoriously bad resin caster "sells" them and I tried buying a couple of sets to no avail.thats what im going for dont have the halibrands tho
AMT 1/25 Shelby Cobra 289 Roadster
#41
Posted 06 October 2012 - 12:29 PM
#42
Posted 06 October 2012 - 01:10 PM
I wish they were easily available.
Were the K-H Sunburst wheels included in a 1/24 or 1/25 scale kit?
#43
Posted 06 October 2012 - 01:50 PM
bummerI wish they were easily available. One notoriously bad resin caster "sells" them and I tried buying a couple of sets to no avail.
#44
Posted 07 October 2012 - 06:03 AM
Not that I know of. Anyone else?Were the K-H Sunburst wheels included in a 1/24 or 1/25 scale kit?
#46
Posted 07 October 2012 - 01:22 PM
Ha....see my earlier comment.
#47
Posted 07 October 2012 - 02:12 PM
#48
Posted 07 October 2012 - 02:23 PM
#49
Posted 07 October 2012 - 02:52 PM
#50
Posted 27 October 2012 - 09:36 AM
#51
Posted 31 October 2012 - 04:46 PM

#52
Posted 01 November 2012 - 03:21 AM
Ray pointed out the top, so...
Not sure what the good points would be compared to the most recent reissue, which seemed to have most of the optional custom parts. The kit does have an opening hood and trunk. Hopefully they cleaned up the tooling a little bit for this one, it was just starting to look a little bit haggard on the last reissue in spots.
It does have full engine detail. Just one engine- the 289, but if I recall it can be built with Weber carbs or a single carb. The kit also has a separate chassis with decent front and rear suspension detail- there's a metal axle at both ends, but each end has its own transverse leaf spring. Compared to the 1:24 Monogram Cobra, I think this one has better interior detail. It also lacks the wide fender flares Monogram's 427 has, so you could even convert it back to an AC Ace if you wanted.
My only serious gripe with any of these I've built is the windshield frame- sometimes it fits the cowl pretty well, other times it doesn't. The hinged hood and trunk have always worked well for me.
It is my understanding from John Mueller (long time AMT, Lesney/AMT and AMT/Ertl kit designer) that the AMT Cobra was actually modeled off the ORIGINAL Shelby AC Cobra, s/n CX0001. If so, that is an AC Ace chassis, AC Ace bodywork, and a 260cid Ford small block. As such, it is a completely different Cobra than the 427 as kitted by Revell. AC Ace and the 260/289 AC Cobra's used the Tojiero transverse leaf spring suspension as produced by FIAT from the early 1950's onward for several years, while the 427 used a completely new coil-over suspension system.
Round2's box art isn't the same as the original issue kit though, the artwork on that kit box was much more artistic, certainly not the cartoon-like image shown above.
Art
#53
Posted 01 November 2012 - 05:34 AM
http://www.modelcars...topic=65165&hl=
#54
Posted 01 November 2012 - 05:48 AM
For starters the first car, often referred to as the "289 Cobra" started life with the first thin wall cast small block engine. First a 221 cid, then the 260 and finally the 289, all of which would be represented in the kit with varying accessories, as all of these engines shared the same outward dimensions and appearance
The Revell / Monogram ,on the other hand, are of a totally different car, the oft referred to "427" Cobra (this car came with a 428 cid engine at the end of its run).
, sometimes referred to as the "coil sprung" car because of the coil spring suspension used. As to the "Wide fender version" talked about in post above, this was the only car from the Shelby factory (?) that had these mainly to accommodate wider tyers.
So come on guys, do your home work. Ol' Shel must be spinnin' in his grave.
289
427
Edited by Greg Myers, 01 November 2012 - 05:49 AM.
#55
Posted 01 November 2012 - 01:18 PM
Not quite right-although your point is well taken. Many who build these models know nothing of the 1:1. In fact, both your illustrations are probably replicas (although good ones), most likely ERAs, or have replica part additions.The Revell / Monogram ,on the other hand, are of a totally different car, the oft referred to "427" Cobra (this car came with a 428 cid engine at the end of its run).
427 engines (both Sideoiler and Centeroiler) were used from CSX 3002 to ~3200.
428's ran from 3201 to 3305+/-. CSX 3306 to 3360 were 427 Sideoilers, mostly hydraulic lifter.
Ref; Colin Comer's book 'Shelby', p.86.
And yes in model form, you can hardly tell the difference. Except for valve covers and air pans. Which owners of originals and replicas swap around anyway.
All very confusing. Almost anything you do in a model has been done in a 1:1.
#56
Posted 01 November 2012 - 01:52 PM
Edited by Greg Myers, 01 November 2012 - 01:53 PM.
#57
Posted 01 November 2012 - 02:14 PM
You could say that. Built, raced and drove this one the last 27 years:You must be a Cobra expert to be able to tell the difference between a real Cobra and a clone,replica, kit, tribute or continuation from just a photo. 1

Is it an original or replica
Was not picking a nit-in fact I lauded your point. Simply corrected a generalized statement you made.
After all, your point was about those who "...have little or no knowledge of the ancestry of the Cobra roadster ( or coupe, for that matter)."
We're both increasing their knowledge factor.
#58
Posted 01 November 2012 - 02:23 PM
#59
Posted 01 November 2012 - 03:33 PM
A very small number of cars are exactly as they left Shelby American or AC.
Many cars that were born 'street cars' now sport competition equipment. Some dedicated 1:1 replica builders, such as myself, research long and hard for originality yet must accept the compromises inherent in the replica manufacturer's design.
So a 1:1 reference 'library' would take an expert to sort originals from replicas. Unless all the photos came from the '60's.
Again, I think 98% of Cobra modelers accept 'stand-off scale' models and be done with it. Close enough...
#60
Posted 01 November 2012 - 06:47 PM
The basics still must be researched and many here and among the automotive enthusiast world could learn much in research.
With so many books available on the subject, some good many bad, the basic information is there. With the passing of Carrol Shelby the current crop of magazines will certainly cove many areas of the man and his cars.













