Jump to content

So What's next in line for the Revell '32 Ford ?

  • You cannot reply to this topic
65 replies to this topic

Poll: What's Next for Revells '32 Fords ? (109 member(s) have cast votes)

What Would You like to see next in the Revell '32 Ford series ?

  1. Victoria (25 votes [22.94%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 22.94%

  2. Phaeton (7 votes [6.42%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 6.42%

  3. B-400 Convertable Sedan (14 votes [12.84%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 12.84%

  4. Closed Cab Pick Up (42 votes [38.53%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 38.53%

  5. Voted Sedan Delivery / Panel (21 votes [19.27%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 19.27%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#61 oldcarfan


    MCM Friend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 104 posts
  • Location:Texas
  • Full Name:Gary

Posted 16 February 2013 - 05:08 AM

I voted for the pickup, but I would love to see them start re-issuing all the previous versions but with stock and maybe also vintage speed parts added. How about some vintage Bonneville/drylakes components? It would give me a whole new reason to buy more.  I have started to buy more of them at various times, but the modern day components always stopped me.,

#62 Greg Myers

Greg Myers

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,114 posts
  • Location:Phoenix, AZ
  • Full Name:Gregory Myers

Posted 23 February 2013 - 05:15 AM

So if it's going to be a stock version, or a kit with stock parts, which body style ( older releases included) ?

#63 1930fordpickup


    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,425 posts
  • Location:Michigan/Ohio border
  • Full Name:Andy Lemble

Posted 23 February 2013 - 07:19 AM

My guess and vote is the Pickup. 

It is the most logical for sales. 

#64 Casey


    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,132 posts
  • Location:Milwaukee, WI
  • Full Name:Casey Littmann

Posted 08 March 2013 - 03:55 PM

Should there come a day when the bottoms of our feet get really cold and a kit of Chili Catallo's Deuce is released, I hope it's not with these wheel covers!  :wacko:





I do like the "recipe" idea for calling out which kits and parts one needs to build a replica of the real thing, though.  :)

#65 Greg Myers

Greg Myers

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,114 posts
  • Location:Phoenix, AZ
  • Full Name:Gregory Myers

Posted 09 March 2013 - 05:54 AM

That "Recipe" thing was something they used to do in Car Craft and I believe Rod & Custom magazines in years (early '60's) gone by.

#66 Dennis Lacy

Dennis Lacy

    MCM Avid Poster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 391 posts
  • Location:La Verne, California
  • Full Name:Dennis Lacy

Posted 09 March 2013 - 09:36 AM

I always thought the AMT '32 Vic had a chopped look to it, and that's why I modified the AMT body to fit the Revell fenders, etc.  It's a little narrow from side to side, but the conversion seems to look OK. 




The height of the side windows on a Victoria are 1.25" shorter than a 2-door / 4-door sedan. If AMT scaled the windows correctly then the body should appear slightly chopped.


The Victoria used the same windshield frame as a sedan. Too account for this the edges of the Victoria roof have more crown than a sedan so the windshield works out and head room isn't compromised. There are a bunch of subtle changes going on with a Victoria vs. the sedan models. Ford really did put the work into it to make the Victoria, IMO, the most ellagent looking of all of the 1932 body styles.