What Do You Think was the Worst Car Made?
#21
Posted 27 October 2012 - 04:10 AM
#22
Posted 27 October 2012 - 04:17 AM
#23
Posted 27 October 2012 - 04:17 AM
#24
Posted 27 October 2012 - 04:19 AM
Mine personally was a Pontiac Fiero..........
When I was serving in the military, my XO (executive officer) bought a new '84 Pontiac Fiero.
rightfully proud of his new purchase, after our morning formation he decided to show off his new car.
I remember walking around the thing, admiring the rubber body panels and looking at the mid-engine design, listening to
the Captain telling us all the cool features.
Then when he went to start it up.....................nothing..........dead as could be.
what a POS. brand new car, less than 500 miles on it. if I remember correctly it was gone within a month.
and the XO bought a new Camaro.
#25
Posted 27 October 2012 - 04:22 AM
#26
Posted 27 October 2012 - 04:30 AM
#27
Posted 27 October 2012 - 04:50 AM
#28
Posted 27 October 2012 - 06:09 AM
...also, I maintainrd a fleet of 60 Mitsubishi pickups in the mid '80s (same as a Dodge D50), and amazingly, not one had cylinder head cracking issues. Of course, part of the maintenence program was to check the water in the cooling system......
Trabants though....... now there's a really poor excuse for an automobile...anemic, smoking 2-stroke engine, phenol resin / cotton fiber body.....but it's kind of a cult car now.
Edited by Ace-Garageguy, 27 October 2012 - 06:40 AM.
#29
Posted 27 October 2012 - 06:30 AM
#30
Posted 27 October 2012 - 06:30 AM
Drove a Fairmont doing contract work between Houston and Mississippi, what a piece of garbage, the Fairmont, not Mississippi.
Next would be the Reliant, what were they thinking??
CadillacPat
#31
Posted 27 October 2012 - 07:07 AM
Cheers, Ian
#32
Posted 27 October 2012 - 07:43 AM
#33
Posted 27 October 2012 - 07:50 AM
Edited by sjordan2, 27 October 2012 - 08:01 AM.
#34
Posted 27 October 2012 - 08:28 AM
i nominate the 90s for the hall of shameI nominate the 1970s for the Hall of Shame, during which only a few brands around the world made anything but junk. Barrett-Jackson bidders may disagree, but the muscle cars from then are much better in today's restored condition than they were new. It's like the entire car industry was scrambling so hard to deal with a global fuel shortage and US emission and safety regulations that quality was put on the back burner.
#35
Posted 27 October 2012 - 09:12 AM
#36
Posted 27 October 2012 - 10:01 AM
i nominate the 90s for the hall of shame
Good choice, too. The beginning of an era so loaded with unreliable, obsolescent computer technology that those and today's cars will be nearly impossible to maintain or restore. I couldn't even get body and trim parts from GM for my '93 Corvette in 2006 because they'd been discontinued. Imagine trying to replace the "Master Control" computer in any car made today in the next ten years.
Edited by sjordan2, 27 October 2012 - 10:30 AM.
#37
Posted 27 October 2012 - 11:19 AM
Good choice, too. The beginning of an era so loaded with unreliable, obsolescent computer technology that those and today's cars will be nearly impossible to maintain or restore. I couldn't even get body and trim parts from GM for my '93 Corvette in 2006 because they'd been discontinued. Imagine trying to replace the "Master Control" computer in any car made today in the next ten years.
Yup.
#38
Posted 27 October 2012 - 11:35 AM
Two vehicles that have always been at the top of my list were both Renaults...The Fuego and Le Car. To call them manure spreaders would be doing a disservice to farm machinery everywhere...even the finest of Russian tractors. Their styling was abysmal ,at best, but it was the mechanical aspects of these disasters that stuck in my mind. I could go on forever about them, but that would be wasting time on the same scale as actually attempting repairs on them.
Anyone remember the Chevette Diesel?
#39
Posted 27 October 2012 - 12:12 PM
#40
Posted 27 October 2012 - 12:41 PM












