It pays to be honest, thanks Revell
#1
Posted 03 November 2012 - 01:44 PM
#2
Posted 03 November 2012 - 02:16 PM
#3
Posted 03 November 2012 - 02:20 PM
#4
Posted 03 November 2012 - 03:22 PM
I did something similar a number of months ago . I bought a '69 Dart GTS (1995 Revell issue) off of eBay ; its glass was bad (tyres burns and random scratches) . Knowing that obviously the glass from the sub seq. '68 Darts is exactly the same , I knew that they'd work for the '69.
In my email ("contact form") to Revell , I'd told 'em exactly what had happened . I simply requested a new set of glass for the '68 Dart , and asked them how much it'd be to have the replacement mailed to me . Obviously , I wasn't trying to replace defective-as-received-new parts .
No reply / response
One week later , I receive a package in the mail ...
... the replacement glass
They just sent it to me at no charge !
That's some excellent P.R. on their part
I emailed them with a heartfelt thanks .
#5
Posted 03 November 2012 - 03:25 PM
#6
Posted 03 November 2012 - 03:31 PM
#7
Posted 03 November 2012 - 03:42 PM
#8
Posted 03 November 2012 - 03:54 PM
I'm kinda surprised you had issues with the Duplicolor primer. I've been using it for years with no trouble.
I dont for the most part either, but I have noticed that with the new Revell plastic, and same with some kits from Japanese companys ( Tamyia,Fujimi, Aoshima) that it will craze
#9
Posted 03 November 2012 - 04:19 PM
#10
Posted 03 November 2012 - 05:51 PM
As to primer- I generally stick to Plasti-Kote, it seems to be a little cooler. I've also used the inexpensive "Bright Beauty" brand with no ill effects.
Charlie Larkin
#11
Posted 03 November 2012 - 05:58 PM
#12
Posted 03 November 2012 - 06:35 PM
#13
Posted 03 November 2012 - 06:36 PM
#14
Posted 03 November 2012 - 06:43 PM
Edited by niteowl7710, 03 November 2012 - 06:43 PM.
#15
Posted 04 November 2012 - 02:00 AM
They are also cheaper in price but not in quality. And, they dry quickly and thin.
Bob
#16
Posted 04 November 2012 - 02:43 AM
#17
Posted 04 November 2012 - 05:51 AM
That pretty funny, when I wanted a replacement Audi R8 Spyder for the warped washcloth they included that was impersonating as the body shell, they wanted me to ship it to Illinois on my dime to inspect it first.
Could it be they wanted to know if it was a Revell AG kit or USA kit?
Joe.
#18
Posted 04 November 2012 - 05:57 AM
Could it be they wanted to know if it was a Revell AG kit or USA kit?
Joe.
That's what I was thinking as well. it could be possible the RAG kits don't use the exact same materials that say a Monte SS Donk Kit might.
#19
Posted 04 November 2012 - 08:20 AM
Nice update on Revell's customer service. I buggered a wing-half on a 1/32 Spitfire years ago, and I'd really like to finish it someday. I'll happily pay for a replacement....now to contact Revell and fess up.
Edited by Ace-Garageguy, 04 November 2012 - 08:21 AM.
#20
Posted 04 November 2012 - 01:13 PM
Could it be they wanted to know if it was a Revell AG kit or USA kit?
Joe.
I specified it was the US re-box, along with the part/kit numbers, which are not the same between the two. They said they had gotten no other complaints about warping. Which I guess meant I was trying to scam them, rather than the fact the kit had only been on the market for a week.












