Mickey Thompson's Challenger One. Apr.22 : baby's gettin' curves
#21
Posted 05 November 2012 - 12:34 PM
#22
Posted 12 November 2012 - 02:43 PM
#23
Posted 12 November 2012 - 02:59 PM
My attempt (cough) on this kit was rather abysmal, but that was a long time ago now. I'm looking forward to taking another stab at it with it being reissued again. I have this nagging urge to model it in bare aluminum.
#24
Posted 13 November 2012 - 03:48 AM
Please keep us posted of your progress, you have here another project fan!!!
Fred
#25
Posted 18 November 2012 - 04:37 PM
I've glassed the underside of the center body panel with two plies of very fine model aircraft cloth and epoxy resin. This will keep everything together and aligned while I remove the scoops. The limited bonding area around the periphery of the styrene inserts isn't sufficient to trust during the cutting operation.

This is a trial of the technique I'm working on to represent raw aluminum bodywork. I don't want to use Alcald as it's too regular, and straight buffing-metalizer doesn't give exactly the effect I'm after.

I realize now that part of the reason I made such a dog's breakfast of this kit when I was young was my lack of understanding of the functions of the parts represented. Though this is a GREAT kit, it takes some massaging and light modification to get it to all work like it's supposed to. For example.....the steering shaft location in the center of the car isn't really illustrated very well on the instructions, and there are no locating tabs for most of it. Test fitting showed that it has to be installed slightly offset at the front, in order to hook up correctly to the steering linkage on the front axle. Although the steering box and shaft are correctly molded to allow for this, the instructions don't mention it, and nothing will fit right in front without the offset, as shown.
There is also a hooya in the lower frame rails at the bottom of the photo. This is introduced by the locating tabs on the bellypan being just slightly too close together in this area. They will be modified.

Part of the refit of the car to its earlier configuration involves substituting different front-covers on the engines. The Cragar chain-drive covers for the blowers performed this function on the later version. The chrome front-cover shown is from the Revell Pontiac engine parts-pack, but it doesn't fit the fabricated oil pans on the Challenger engines. I'm looking for photos of the injected engines to get this detail right.
Edited by Ace-Garageguy, 18 November 2012 - 04:53 PM.
#26
Posted 25 November 2012 - 09:42 AM

The profile of the car just isn't as voluptuous as the 1:1 shots appear, so that will have to be addressed.....

Still, I really love the look of purpose and speed this car always presents. There will be considerable test-fitting and minor mods to make everything fit, skinwise, as well, but this is a truly outstanding kit and everyone who is interested in the history of motorsports needs one of these. It will make a better, more patient builder out of you, too.
Edited by Ace-Garageguy, 25 November 2012 - 09:43 AM.
#27
Posted 25 November 2012 - 09:53 AM
Still, looks ready to rip.
#28
Posted 25 November 2012 - 09:53 AM
#29
Posted 25 November 2012 - 10:56 AM
...The profile of the car just isn't as voluptuous as the 1:1 shots appear, so that will have to be addressed.....
Still, I really love the look of purpose and speed this car always presents. There will be considerable test-fitting and minor mods to make everything fit, skinwise, as well, but this is a truly outstanding kit and everyone who is interested in the history of motorsports needs one of these. It will make a better, more patient builder out of you, too.
The unblown version has a considerably different nose section which accounts for the less dramatic contours of the later version Your comment got me wandering the web for pictures to confirm this. Here a some that illustrate the point. You'll notice that, assuming the height of the fender tops remained constant, the sheet metal between the fenders was rased and the contour of the fender tops merged into the surface in a less vertical contour. Also the nose openings are very different. Here are some pictures I found interesting.
These are from Machine-History.com ( http://www.machine-h...r I Streamliner ):


I'm not certain but it appears possible that the crests of the front fenders were extended rearward some what more on the initial version, too, at least compared to Revell's version. They appear to resolve into the engine deck at about the center of the front most exhaust port. :

And here's an interesting photo from the Hemmings site ( http://blog.hemmings...-i-streamliner/ ) that shows the car in an early form on its way to Edwards Air Force Base for some test runs where it went 250 MPH. Notice the additional vent openings.

In any case, this is an exciting and beautiful project you're tackling. I love the colors you've used for the chassis. Can't wait to see more!
#30
Posted 25 November 2012 - 11:14 AM
#31
Posted 25 November 2012 - 11:21 AM
There also appears to be more reverse-curvature behind the front wheel openings on the early car. This also would be in keeping with an attempt at reducing drag...in this case induced drag possibly caused by the slight lift or negative-pressure created by the down-curve behind the tops of the wheel openings.
Air is happiest flowing in straight lines, and though the earlier car is surely prettier, the later one is undeniably slicker. The straightening of the body contours may also have been done to try to compensate somewhat for the massive increase in drag produced by the blowers and scoops up in the air stream on the record version.
Edited by Ace-Garageguy, 25 November 2012 - 01:06 PM.
#32
Posted 25 November 2012 - 11:46 AM
By the way, when it comes to voluptuous streamliners the old Hammon-Whipp-McGrath Redhead will never be equaled!

#33
Posted 25 November 2012 - 12:02 PM
By the way, when it comes to voluptuous streamliners the old Hammon-Whipp-McGrath Redhead will never be equaled!
....aptly named, too. Without a doubt, the most unabashedly feminine-built-for-speed set of lines ever wrapped around a machine. Just pure sexy.
#34
Posted 25 November 2012 - 12:59 PM
#35
Posted 25 November 2012 - 01:26 PM
As an LSR fan, I'll be looking over your shoulder on this one for sure.
Nice start, and extra credit for building a variant.!
#36
Posted 25 November 2012 - 01:50 PM
I wonder if any credit was given to Mickey for the look of the Corvette. LOL
#37
Posted 25 November 2012 - 02:21 PM
.....one of the more challenging kits out there...
#38
Posted 25 November 2012 - 02:44 PM
#39
Posted 25 November 2012 - 03:46 PM
#40
Posted 25 November 2012 - 07:47 PM












