How many forum posters does it take to change a light bulb?
#21
Posted 08 November 2012 - 09:18 AM
Someone to comment that the plural of "URL" is URLs, not URL's.
#22
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:47 AM
Ain't it funny how the funny stuff seems to be the truth about things
#23
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:56 AM
Edited by Wagoneer81, 08 November 2012 - 10:56 AM.
#24
Posted 08 November 2012 - 10:57 AM
#25
Posted 08 November 2012 - 11:05 AM
#26
Posted 08 November 2012 - 12:04 PM
#27
Posted 08 November 2012 - 12:05 PM
Ahh forget it, I'll use the light of the fire instead
Good one Doug, I got a laugh out of that
#28
Posted 08 November 2012 - 12:13 PM
How many forum posters does it take to change a light bulb?
1 to change the light bulb and to post that the light bulb has been changed
14 to share similar experiences of changing light bulbs and how the light bulb could have been changed differently.
7 to caution about the dangers of changing light bulbs
6 to argue over whether it's "lightbulb" or "light bulb"
Another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid
2 industry professionals to inform the group that the proper term is "lamp"
15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the industry, and that "light bulb" is perfectly correct
19 to post that this forum is not about light bulbs and to please take this discussion to a light bulb forum
11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all use light bulbs and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum
36 to debate which method of changing light bulbs is superior, where to buy the best light bulbs, what brand of light bulbs work best for this technique and what brands are faulty
5 People to post pics of their own light bulbs
15 People to post "I can't see S$%^!" and use their own light bulbs
7 to post URL's where one can see examples of different light bulbs
4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's
13 to link all posts to date, quote them in their entirety including all headers and signatures, and add "Me too"
5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the light bulb controversy
4 to say "Didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"
13 to say "Do a search on light bulbs before posting questions about light bulbs"
1 to bring politics into the discussion by adding that George W. isn't the brightest bulb.
4 more to get into personal attacks over their political views.
1 moderator to lock the light bulb thread.
1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start it all over again.
X2
#29
Posted 08 November 2012 - 12:32 PM
Bill your statement got my attention.....so i did some research.....and in Lite of it all i must agree.........and to make it more environmentally relevant, or for anyone conscious of his (minus 10 points...not PC) carbon footprint, the merits of changing to the 'bulb-lite' could be brought in......
#30
Posted 08 November 2012 - 12:52 PM
#31
Posted 08 November 2012 - 12:59 PM
#32
Posted 08 November 2012 - 01:00 PM
#33
Posted 08 November 2012 - 01:02 PM
#34
Posted 08 November 2012 - 01:03 PM
You forgot the 30 spelling nazis.
Nazis should be capitalized, since it is the proper name of a political party, such as Republicans and Democrats.
Edited by sjordan2, 08 November 2012 - 01:08 PM.
#35
Posted 08 November 2012 - 01:03 PM
Attached Files
Edited by midnightprowler, 08 November 2012 - 01:04 PM.
#36
Posted 08 November 2012 - 01:06 PM
#37
Posted 08 November 2012 - 01:09 PM
I sure am glad I had a Jim Beam & RC Cola already. I think I'll have another after this thread.
Don't forget the Jagermeister.
Edited by sjordan2, 08 November 2012 - 01:09 PM.
#38
Posted 08 November 2012 - 01:20 PM
#39
Posted 08 November 2012 - 01:21 PM
Nazis should be capitalized, since it is the proper name of a political party, such as Republicans and Democrats.
I don't respect nazis, spelling or otherwise enough to capitalize the n.
#40
Posted 08 November 2012 - 02:02 PM













