Jump to content


Best of the GT40's ?


  • You cannot reply to this topic
5 replies to this topic

#1 Randy D

Randy D

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 555 posts
  • Location:Colorado
  • Full Name:Randy Ditton

Posted 11 December 2012 - 04:05 AM

Hi Folks,   Would like to build a Ford GT40 in 1/24th.    Seems to a wide selection on ebay.  Any recomendations?  Do the different brands all have engines or are some curbside?

 

   Thanks in advance for any help!

 

    Randy

 

         



#2 Daddyfink

Daddyfink

    MCM Friend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 164 posts
  • Location:San Diego CA
  • Full Name:Jesse Chavez

Posted 11 December 2012 - 04:57 AM

Most of the Fujimi kits are curbside. The Revell ones are reboxed Fujimi. The early IMC ones are full detail but can be quite finicky to build. I know a few that have kitbashed them to make full detail cars using Fujimi bodies and IMC innards. And of course, there are a few aftermarket vendors who make conversion kits for full detail.

 

Have fun!



#3 Deathgoblin

Deathgoblin

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 660 posts
  • Location:Columbus, OH
  • Full Name:Brian Wilson

Posted 11 December 2012 - 05:04 AM

I just got a gluebombed IMC GT40.  I could see where people might think it's a finicky kit.  The upper body might be tricky.  The details is outstanding, though.  Especially for that old of a kit. 



#4 Ace-Garageguy

Ace-Garageguy

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,420 posts
  • Location:Down two, then left.
  • Full Name:Bill Engwer

Posted 11 December 2012 - 07:07 AM

Opinions abound on this topic, but I personally think the Mk2 version in the Fujimi GT40 P1075 kits, as raced in Gulf colors at LeMans in '68-'69 is the definitive and best-looking of all of the many GT40 variants. Over the years there were variations of roofline and spoiler profile, scoop placement, number and size, hood vent configuration, and even front fender shape. I think the '68-'69 Mk2 is the peak aesthetically.

 

There is good structural detail in these kits, and ample opportunity to add full engines and details with a little work.



#5 Randy D

Randy D

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 555 posts
  • Location:Colorado
  • Full Name:Randy Ditton

Posted 13 December 2012 - 05:59 PM

Hi Guys,

 

   Daddyfink , Deathgoblin, and Bill   thank you for taking the time to reply.

 

   Going to get a IMC in 1/25th and a Fujimi in 1/24   and see which I like.

 

   Bill,  I too like the mark II ,  course in 1:1 ,  I'll take any old mark!

 

 

 

     Randy



#6 Draggon

Draggon

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,615 posts
  • Location:Home of the Fremont Drag Strip
  • Full Name:Glenn Asher

Posted 14 December 2012 - 11:57 AM

I always liked the old Aurora version. Parts fit was good, detail was good, and I managed to build it when I was a teenager. Revell-O-gram reissued it in 1997. I think the engine might have been a bit small, but the kit built quite well. 

 

 

 

Monogram%20565%20FordGT.JPG