Jump to content


Upsides and downsides to Lindberg kits?


  • You cannot reply to this topic
23 replies to this topic

#1 dantewallace

dantewallace

    MCM Friend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 233 posts
  • Location:Hagerstown MD
  • Full Name:dante dwayne wallace

Posted 24 January 2013 - 10:23 AM

For the past 20+ years I have always been skeptical of the quality of lindberg kits and because of that have never bought or built one. They now have a few models that I am seriously thinking of purchasing but i do not want to end up being dissapointed upon opening the box. Can anyone give their opinions on their kits in terms of quality,detail?? Upsides,or downsides?

 

Thanks!!



#2 Draggon

Draggon

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,888 posts
  • Location:Home of the Fremont Drag Strip
  • Full Name:Glenn Asher

Posted 24 January 2013 - 11:01 AM

I think it depends upon the kit. I have the 32 Ford roadster pickup. Its pretty poor. I have the "1929 Tee" which I sorta like because of its vintage appeal. And I have this one. I picked it up on ebay, took it apart and freshened it up. Went back together without a hitch. One thing to beware of is that some of their older kits have plastic tires.

 

DSCN0684-vi.jpg



#3 Tom Geiger

Tom Geiger

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,640 posts
  • Location:Exton, PA
  • Full Name:Tom Geiger

Posted 24 January 2013 - 11:08 AM

The same question applies to all the model companies.  All of them have gone through different periods under different management with different mind sets. The detail quality and complexity of the kit changed with each changing of the guard. Some of the companies have even acquired tools from former companies so the work may not be the same you'd expect from them.

 

Some of the older Lindberg stuff was simple, toy like and poorly molded.  Later date stuff like the '53 Fords were done in the modern era by more astute management so those are nice kits.  



#4 scalenut

scalenut

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 650 posts
  • Location:Tennessee
  • Full Name:Andy Hobbs

Posted 24 January 2013 - 11:10 AM

it depends on the kit , some are great some not so great... there is a thread on here somewhere listing the good from the bad



#5 Chuck Most

Chuck Most

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,239 posts
  • Location:Ithaca, MI
  • Full Name:Charles Donald Eric Richard Jules Kasim Most

Posted 24 January 2013 - 11:39 AM

The same question applies to all the model companies.  All of them have gone through different periods under different management with different mind sets. The detail quality and complexity of the kit changed with each changing of the guard. Some of the companies have even acquired tools from former companies so the work may not be the same you'd expect from them.

 

Some of the older Lindberg stuff was simple, toy like and poorly molded.  Later date stuff like the '53 Fords were done in the modern era by more astute management so those are nice kits.  

Perfectly stated. B)



#6 gtx6970

gtx6970

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,016 posts
  • Location:Northern Ky
  • Full Name:Bill Allphin

Posted 24 January 2013 - 12:22 PM

Keep in mind some of them are just re-boxed kits from other manufacturers.

 

Little Red Wagon and the L700 tilt cab Dodge truck as an example , both are/were  IMC kits



#7 Casey

Casey

    MCM Ohana

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,329 posts
  • Location:Milwaukee, WI
  • Full Name:Casey Littmann

Posted 24 January 2013 - 12:43 PM

They now have a few models that I am seriously thinking of purchasing but i do not want to end up being dissapointed upon opening the box. Can anyone give their opinions on their kits in terms of quality,detail?? Upsides,or downsides?

 

If you can list the specific kit you're considering, we can give some more direct feedback. There may be reviews of the kit in the Kit Reviews sections, too.



#8 martinfan5

martinfan5

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,407 posts
  • Location:Los Santos, San Andreas
  • Full Name:Jonathan Stephens

Posted 24 January 2013 - 02:47 PM

The Charger police kits are decent kits, but for the most part, I believe they are reboxed Testors tooling, minus the tooling for the police equipment



#9 dantewallace

dantewallace

    MCM Friend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 233 posts
  • Location:Hagerstown MD
  • Full Name:dante dwayne wallace

Posted 24 January 2013 - 02:49 PM

 

If you can list the specific kit you're considering, we can give some more direct feedback. There may be reviews of the kit in the Kit Reviews sections, too.

 

This one here.....http://www.modelcars...rd-mustang.html



#10 Miatatom

Miatatom

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 611 posts
  • Location:Soddy Daisy, TN (near Chattanooga)
  • Full Name:Tom Shirley

Posted 24 January 2013 - 06:47 PM

I've just started a Don Nicholson 1961 Chevrolet. The body is very nice with very small and fine panel lines that are easily removed. I haven't started assembly but I like what I see so far.



#11 Blown03SVT

Blown03SVT

    MCM Avid Poster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 457 posts
  • Location:Virginia Beach, Va.
  • Full Name:Eric Terry

Posted 25 January 2013 - 01:15 AM

The newer tooling isn't bad. The 66 Chevelle, 61 Impala, 64 Dodge come to mind. Those ones are actually really nice



#12 jaymcminn

jaymcminn

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 631 posts
  • Location:Naples, FL
  • Full Name:Jason McMinn

Posted 25 January 2013 - 04:57 AM

 

This one here.....http://www.modelcars...rd-mustang.html

 

 

This is actually a rebox of an old Palmer Plastics mold- it's a fairly terrible kit, as were all of Palmer's 1/25 cars. If you compare the box top photo with an actual '71 Mustang, they don't really look that much alike- the model looks more like a '70 with a lackadaisical attempt at a '71 front end grafted on. I'd pass. 



#13 Blown03SVT

Blown03SVT

    MCM Avid Poster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 457 posts
  • Location:Virginia Beach, Va.
  • Full Name:Eric Terry

Posted 25 January 2013 - 05:16 AM

I think it depends upon the kit. I have the 32 Ford roadster pickup. Its pretty poor. I have the "1929 Tee" which I sorta like because of its vintage appeal. And I have this one. I picked it up on ebay, took it apart and freshened it up. Went back together without a hitch. One thing to beware of is that some of their older kits have plastic tires.
 
DSCN0684-vi.jpg


This is a cool like truck btw... I am assuming it is kit bashed and not OTB. That would be a neat little bugger to have.

#14 Casey

Casey

    MCM Ohana

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,329 posts
  • Location:Milwaukee, WI
  • Full Name:Casey Littmann

Posted 25 January 2013 - 06:06 AM

 

This one here.....http://www.modelcars...rd-mustang.html

 

 

 

 

This is actually a rebox of an old Palmer Plastics mold- it's a fairly terrible kit, as were all of Palmer's 1/25 cars. If you compare the box top photo with an actual '71 Mustang, they don't really look that much alike- the model looks more like a '70 with a lackadaisical attempt at a '71 front end grafted on. I'd pass. 

 

Agreed. Don't buy it. It's a horrible kit.

 

The MPC/AMT '71-'73 Mustang kits are much better, but still not up to modern/current kit standards.



#15 dantewallace

dantewallace

    MCM Friend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 233 posts
  • Location:Hagerstown MD
  • Full Name:dante dwayne wallace

Posted 25 January 2013 - 06:09 AM

 

 

This is actually a rebox of an old Palmer Plastics mold- it's a fairly terrible kit, as were all of Palmer's 1/25 cars. If you compare the box top photo with an actual '71 Mustang, they don't really look that much alike- the model looks more like a '70 with a lackadaisical attempt at a '71 front end grafted on. I'd pass. 

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!! Oh well,Thanks for the heads up,I appreciate that.



#16 Draggon

Draggon

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,888 posts
  • Location:Home of the Fremont Drag Strip
  • Full Name:Glenn Asher

Posted 25 January 2013 - 09:30 AM

Thx Eric. Since I'm not the original builder I'm not certain what was done to it, but to me it looks like its OTB.  All that he changed was to put the spinner hubcaps on and lakes pipes that appear to be from AMT's 32 Ford coupe. There is no evidence of any surgery performed. All of the white is bare plastic. 



#17 Guest_G Holding_*

Guest_G Holding_*
  • Guests

Posted 26 January 2013 - 06:27 AM

Most lindberg kits are poor...vs what is currently being made. That said, they do have a few kool kits,to start with..the 34 PU and the 64 dodge 330, both will take a bit of work, but thats what makes it fun.



#18 Modelmartin

Modelmartin

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,836 posts
  • Location:No matter where you go...
  • Full Name:Mr. Yuk

Posted 26 January 2013 - 07:17 AM

They have tooling from everywhere! They acquired a lot of Pyro tooling which was pretty uneven even in the day. They were selling the old AMT 34 Ford pickup, IMC Little Red Wagon Dodge A100 pickup, It is a real potluck of kits!



#19 Deathgoblin

Deathgoblin

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 979 posts
  • Location:Columbus, OH
  • Full Name:Brian Wilson

Posted 26 January 2013 - 07:58 AM

Any of the Lindberg 1/20 scale kits are outstanding, if you can find them.  I've had the S-10 and the Dodge Stealth, and they were both excellent.  The 1953 Ford is nice and so is the 64 Dodge.  I would avoid the Dodge Challenger, it's another Palmer kit, and it's terrible. 



#20 Art Anderson

Art Anderson

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,099 posts

Posted 26 January 2013 - 01:20 PM

This is a cool like truck btw... I am assuming it is kit bashed and not OTB. That would be a neat little bugger to have.

That is pretty much as Lindberg tooled and produced this kit back about 1961, with the exception of the hubcaps and lakes pipes.

 

Art