Jump to content


Which kit has the best HEMI?


  • You cannot reply to this topic
17 replies to this topic

#1 MAGNUM4342

MAGNUM4342

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,285 posts
  • Location:Parkersburg
  • Full Name:Kevin White

Posted 16 February 2013 - 03:28 PM

This is actually a three parter. I would like to know, in your own opinion, which kits in 1/25/24th scale has the best:

 

392 HEMI?

 

426 HEMI?

 

Modern HEMI?



#2 Longbox55

Longbox55

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,598 posts
  • Location:Danville Il
  • Full Name:Bill Burmeister

Posted 16 February 2013 - 03:44 PM

A stock 392 is a no brainer, the Mobeus 300. For a drag version, my vote would go for any of the Revell '41 Willys (new tool) kits or the Miss Deal Studebaker.



#3 MAGNUM4342

MAGNUM4342

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,285 posts
  • Location:Parkersburg
  • Full Name:Kevin White

Posted 16 February 2013 - 03:56 PM

A stock 392 is a no brainer, the Mobeus 300. For a drag version, my vote would go for any of the Revell '41 Willys (new tool) kits or the Miss Deal Studebaker.

Aaaargh! I just traded away my Stude earlier this evening! :lol: What do you think of the AMT Chrysler 300 HEMI?


Edited by MAGNUM4342, 16 February 2013 - 04:48 PM.


#4 gtx6970

gtx6970

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,890 posts
  • Location:Northern Ky
  • Full Name:Bill Allphin

Posted 17 February 2013 - 11:22 AM

I've got a complete miss deal kit I'll use to trade with (doesn't have to be stryene either )

 

I've also got the intake from the Johan cuda if you still need it.

 

As far as an accurate 426 I think it depends on what your trying to replicate,



#5 Rob Hall

Rob Hall

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,072 posts
  • Location:Phoenix, Arizona
  • Full Name:Robert Hall

Posted 17 February 2013 - 11:39 AM

For a modern Hemi I like the Revell Magnum or Challenger (6.1 SRT engine).   For a base 5.7 engine, the Testors Charger R/T engine is better than the AMT 300C engine, IMO.


Edited by Rob Hall, 17 February 2013 - 11:40 AM.


#6 Ace-Garageguy

Ace-Garageguy

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,990 posts
  • Location:Down two, then left.
  • Full Name:Bill Engwer

Posted 17 February 2013 - 11:47 AM

For a modern Hemi I like the Revell Magnum or Challenger (6.1 SRT engine). 

I agree, BUT (big but) I have both of them on the bench right at this moment and the Challenger block and heads are almost 1/4" inch shorter (in length) than the Magnum. I'm still trying to get a 1:1 measured to find out which one is correct (they're both supposed to be 6.1 Hemis).

 

Another nice racing early (gen1) hemi is in the AMT parts pack, though the detail on the block sides is missing if I remember correctly.


Edited by Ace-Garageguy, 17 February 2013 - 11:50 AM.


#7 mole53

mole53

    MCM Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 28 posts
  • Location:Baton Rouge, La.
  • Full Name:Carl Krumm

Posted 17 February 2013 - 03:39 PM

The 426 out of revell's 67 Charger or any of the 67 mopars are nice ones.

#8 Ace-Garageguy

Ace-Garageguy

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,990 posts
  • Location:Down two, then left.
  • Full Name:Bill Engwer

Posted 20 February 2013 - 06:44 AM

Revell modern 6.1 Hemi...Top white one from the Challenger kit, lower gray one from the Magnum kit.

 

DSCN9228_zps2b08f68a.jpg

 

Which is the correct length ?? Anyone have one to measure ??



#9 LoneWolf15

LoneWolf15

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,300 posts
  • Location:Pittsburgh Pa.

Posted 20 February 2013 - 12:32 PM

Bill.

Isn't bigger always better ? Lol ! Da bigger da motor , da faster she goes . Unless your name was Bill Jenkins , of coarse !

Edited by LoneWolf15, 20 February 2013 - 12:34 PM.


#10 Rob Hall

Rob Hall

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,072 posts
  • Location:Phoenix, Arizona
  • Full Name:Robert Hall

Posted 20 February 2013 - 12:33 PM

I've got several of each of the Magnum and Challenger engines to use in Pro-Touring style builds..I figure I'll use the smaller one where it fits better.



#11 Monty

Monty

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,590 posts
  • Location:Dallas Texas
  • Full Name:Monty

Posted 20 February 2013 - 01:28 PM

Revell modern 6.1 Hemi...Top white one from the Challenger kit, lower gray one from the Magnum kit.
 
DSCN9228_zps2b08f68a.jpg
 
Which is the correct length ?? Anyone have one to measure ??


Wow, looks like someone tried to do their homework on the bus. That's a huge difference in length, even in this scale. I'm not a Mopar expert by any means, but I'm inclined to believe the white piece replicates the 1:1 more closely.

Where are all our experts? I thought we'd have this resolved in half a day.

#12 cobra

cobra

    MCM Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 17 posts

Posted 20 February 2013 - 02:28 PM

I've always had a soft spot for the look of the 392 in the Hemi-Hydro.



#13 Longbox55

Longbox55

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,598 posts
  • Location:Danville Il
  • Full Name:Bill Burmeister

Posted 20 February 2013 - 03:00 PM

I've always had a soft spot for the look of the 392 in the Hemi-Hydro.

That one is the same engine found in the Miss Deal Studebaker, only with a different intake, the prop drive for the boat, and it doesn't have the separate rocker shafts that go on the heads that the Miss Deal has. Either one is a very nice rendition of the 392.



#14 Rob Hall

Rob Hall

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,072 posts
  • Location:Phoenix, Arizona
  • Full Name:Robert Hall

Posted 20 February 2013 - 03:06 PM

The AMT '29 Ford roadster had an early Hemi IIRC (at least the version I built in the late 80s (molded in red) did....the new tool Ala-Kart had one, but IIRC it was said to be undersized...



#15 Erik Smith

Erik Smith

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,799 posts
  • Location:Spokane, WA
  • Full Name:Erik Smith

Posted 20 February 2013 - 03:50 PM

Revell modern 6.1 Hemi...Top white one from the Challenger kit, lower gray one from the Magnum kit.
 
DSCN9228_zps2b08f68a.jpg
 
Which is the correct length ?? Anyone have one to measure ??


This is an interesting question. Doing some searching, I found this:

http://www.hotrodlan...easurements.pdf

Also, I found the measurements for a custom oil pan for the 6.1 - it is 24" long. I don't have a Revell kit to see which is closer to that.

#16 Ace-Garageguy

Ace-Garageguy

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,990 posts
  • Location:Down two, then left.
  • Full Name:Bill Engwer

Posted 21 February 2013 - 02:34 AM

The AMT '29 Ford roadster had an early Hemi IIRC (at least the version I built in the late 80s (molded in red) did....the new tool Ala-Kart had one, but IIRC it was said to be undersized...

Just for accuracy's sake (though I believe the original question was about the 392 Chrysler Firepower Hemi specifically):

 

The Red Ram 241/ 270 cube (small early hemi) engine in the FIRST TOOL Ala Kart / '29 Ford kit  has an early (about '39) Ford 3-speed trans set up for a closed driveline (torque tube). For the bazillionth time (no offense intended) the ORIGINAL ISSUE ALA KART RED RAM (the one also in the later AMT '29 Ford kit) IS CORRECT (more or less, close enough). The RETOOLED more recent Ala Kart Red Ram is SEVERELY UNDERSCALE. I've posted the actual measurements I made from 1:1 engines on several forums over the years, and this has been confirmed by others in the 1:1 field. The numbers don't lie.

 

Another early and interesting Hemi is the DeSoto Firedome 276 / 291/ 341. There is one available in the AMT '53 Ford pickup. It also is backed up by the ubiquitous Ford early 3-speed, but the pickup has an open driveshaft.


Edited by Ace-Garageguy, 21 February 2013 - 02:51 AM.


#17 Ace-Garageguy

Ace-Garageguy

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,990 posts
  • Location:Down two, then left.
  • Full Name:Bill Engwer

Posted 21 February 2013 - 02:48 AM

This is an interesting question. Doing some searching, I found this:

http://www.hotrodlan...easurements.pdf

Also, I found the measurements for a custom oil pan for the 6.1 - it is 24" long. I don't have a Revell kit to see which is closer to that.

 

Thanks to Erik, the modern Hemi question is resolved. The dimensioned photograph on the page he's linked us to concurs with these findings. The pan for the white Challenger engine measures .945". Multiply by 25, we get 23.62"...much closer to a scale 24" than the pan for the gray Magnum engine that measures 1.144" and scales out to 28.6".

 

So Revell, uhhh...how about explaining a 5" scale discrepency on these engines ?? Ummmm, it's not like one had to be made smaller to fit. It would have cost LESS to use the same tooling for both engines, or at least the same set of basic dimensions. What's up with that ???


Edited by Ace-Garageguy, 21 February 2013 - 02:57 AM.


#18 Ace-Garageguy

Ace-Garageguy

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,990 posts
  • Location:Down two, then left.
  • Full Name:Bill Engwer

Posted 21 February 2013 - 03:08 AM

That one is the same engine found in the Miss Deal Studebaker, only with a different intake, the prop drive for the boat, and it doesn't have the separate rocker shafts that go on the heads that the Miss Deal has. Either one is a very nice rendition of the 392.

Yup, which is also the same one issued as a Revell Parts Pack #C1102, quite rare now and originally labeled as a 413cu.in. engine.