Jump to content


Autodesk 123D Catch


  • You cannot reply to this topic
10 replies to this topic

#1 GerN

GerN

    MCM Friend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 152 posts
  • Location:Bel Air, MD
  • Full Name:Gerald Nielsen

Posted 14 March 2013 - 07:30 AM

This is from the April 2013 issue of Popular Science.

 

Attached File  Autodesk 123D Catch001.jpg   116.76KB   54 downloads



#2 sjordan2

sjordan2

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,881 posts
  • Location:Knoxville, TN
  • Full Name:Skip Jordan

Posted 14 March 2013 - 08:00 AM

Looks pretty amazing. I don't have the built-in RAM to handle it (requires 1 GB), but it would be great if someone on the forum could give it a try and show us the results.



#3 Lownslow

Lownslow

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,844 posts
  • Location:West Side Chicago
  • Full Name:Frank Rizzo

Posted 14 March 2013 - 08:38 AM

Weve been playing with it, its impressive to say the least but it doesnt create a solid and it takes quite a bit of work to make a object printable



#4 MAGNUM4342

MAGNUM4342

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,285 posts
  • Location:Parkersburg
  • Full Name:Kevin White

Posted 14 March 2013 - 10:36 AM

"Pinky...are you thinking what i'm thinking?" :D 


Edited by MAGNUM4342, 14 March 2013 - 10:36 AM.


#5 Chief Joseph

Chief Joseph

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 566 posts
  • Location:Alabamastan
  • Full Name:Joseph Osborn

Posted 14 March 2013 - 12:12 PM

I played with it last Fall and it is neat, but the detail you get on the 3D model is not very good.  But the software's ability to map the object's texture is great, so the resulting 3D model would look good in a movie or game.  I'm sure with a very good camera, very good lighting conditions, and a capture rig like http://media.tumblr....sGqX1r9kw4u.jpg, then you might be able to get something that you could edit and print.  By the way, I got to see a couple of industrial 3D printers in action yesterday.  They were cool.



#6 NormL

NormL

    MCM Friend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 182 posts
  • Location:Lake Tapps, WA
  • Full Name:Norm Larson

Posted 14 March 2013 - 03:16 PM

Joesph, I came to same same conclusions as yourself, that the detail was not there.  I am attributing it to not being able to solve the seven parameters of camera placement in the 3D world as accurately as needed.  I have the ability to physically place the camera focal points at the exact same point as my laser scanners.   Then by solving the locations of the laser scanners through cloud manipulation, solve the exact x, y, and z of the cameras.  The other parameters are a bit more problematic.  I don't think their software will allow for the alignment of photos without touching the x, y and z.  I am curious if 3DSom will allow that.  Then there are the mathematics of the lens.

 

Another method to try would be to print an alignment sheet of radial dashed lines and place the object in the center of it.  Doing this would allow for longer arms in the geometry.  Using the radial lines for alignment would give you much better control of individual photo alignment, I know the 3DSom software suggests this.



#7 Foxer

Foxer

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,094 posts
  • Location:The Berkshires, Massachusetts
  • Full Name:Mike DeRagon

Posted 14 March 2013 - 03:37 PM

What I've seen of it only saves things to their servers and not as a 3d mesh on your computer. Is this correct?



#8 NormL

NormL

    MCM Friend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 182 posts
  • Location:Lake Tapps, WA
  • Full Name:Norm Larson

Posted 14 March 2013 - 05:47 PM

Sorry, Mike, I never got anything I wanted, so, I didn't try.  Download the 14 day trial of 3DSom, its more fun ...



#9 blunc

blunc

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,234 posts
  • Location:phx, az
  • Full Name:mike cassidy

Posted 14 March 2013 - 07:44 PM

"Pinky...are you thinking what i'm thinking?" :D 

"I think so Brain, but I'm not sure flocking the side pipes will impress the judges."



#10 Lownslow

Lownslow

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,844 posts
  • Location:West Side Chicago
  • Full Name:Frank Rizzo

Posted 14 March 2013 - 08:49 PM

Sorry, Mike, I never got anything I wanted, so, I didn't try.  Download the 14 day trial of 3DSom, its more fun ...

http://www.makerbot....int-in-no-time/ i want



#11 NormL

NormL

    MCM Friend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 182 posts
  • Location:Lake Tapps, WA
  • Full Name:Norm Larson

Posted 15 March 2013 - 01:19 PM

I have been beating my head against the wall with these software's.  I have not yet gotten a result that I would use.  OK, I am a laser scanning guy, but, I wanted to test this for small objects as I do not have a small object scanner.  I currently have three scanners for buildings and areas.  I placed an object in the center of a garage that has fairly bright high bay lighting.  I then printed the scanning mat from 3DSom as a 30" circle on my plotter and placed the object on a table in the center of the garage on the mat.  I used a mobile white backing so that the background was not in the photos.  Nothing useful.  Now the issue appears to be lighting as the high bays were not enough and I will now have to get my lighting and green screen kit back from my brother for yet another try.  From what I have seen so far I am far from optmistic

 

Frank I did look at that link and I can't help but notice that no specs exist.  Kind of would expect that lack of specs at an announcement, so, no surprise.  I have been eying the http://www.nextengine.com/ scanner.  If I had a commercial need I would be all over it, but, by the time I would order all that I would need it is right around 8K.  Bit pricy for a toy, I need that commercial need.  And, yes you would want the RapidForm suite