Jump to content


62 impala ss


  • You cannot reply to this topic
4 replies to this topic

#1 knarf

knarf

    MCM Friend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 176 posts
  • Location:michigan
  • Full Name:frank russell matrau jr

Posted 14 March 2013 - 04:02 PM

this impala is amt's 62 ss kit that was so badly warped and ill-fitting that it had to be a custom job.  i basically used only the engine(minus induction) the body and most of the interior from the kit.  the frame is fabbed from two different monogram nascar frames, the induction is from a top fuel dragster kit by monogram along with the back rims and various other bits.  hope you enjoy.

note:yes i did just realize the driveshaft is missing:(

Attached Files

  • Attached File  210.JPG   25.32K   86 downloads
  • Attached File  211.JPG   42.76K   100 downloads
  • Attached File  212.JPG   33.66K   76 downloads
  • Attached File  213.JPG   26.56K   90 downloads
  • Attached File  214.JPG   30.88K   97 downloads
  • Attached File  215.JPG   39K   93 downloads
  • Attached File  216.JPG   48.57K   69 downloads
  • Attached File  217.JPG   37.65K   57 downloads
  • Attached File  218.JPG   30.58K   37 downloads

Edited by knarf, 14 March 2013 - 04:03 PM.


#2 cobraman

cobraman

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,678 posts
  • Location:Arizona
  • Full Name:Ray Kurn

Posted 15 March 2013 - 03:32 AM

Looks sinister.



#3 knarf

knarf

    MCM Friend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 176 posts
  • Location:michigan
  • Full Name:frank russell matrau jr

Posted 15 March 2013 - 01:45 PM

Looks sinister.

thanks for the affirmation...that's exactly what i was goin for :D



#4 Blown03SVT

Blown03SVT

    MCM Avid Poster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 276 posts
  • Location:Virginia Beach, Va.
  • Full Name:Eric Terry

Posted 16 March 2013 - 02:08 AM

That's actually a 63 isn't it? Looks good btw!

#5 knarf

knarf

    MCM Friend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 176 posts
  • Location:michigan
  • Full Name:frank russell matrau jr

Posted 16 March 2013 - 05:08 AM

That's actually a 63 isn't it? Looks good btw!

yes you are correct, it's a 63.   wondered if anyone would catch that:)