34 replies to this topic

[Harry P.]

What do you think?

The answer: REAL!

Edited by harrypri, 05 October 2007 - 05:24 AM.

[Luis Ayala]

I will say Model !!!!!!

[Slick]

I vote model because of the background. The car looks great.

[Modelmartin]

Come on Harry! You can do better. Model.

[kk916]

I'm gonna be the odd guy out here and say its real. It just seems to obvious to be a model

[dub]

Maybe Harry is going easy on us this week! I dunno, it sure looks like a model to me but, the background has been p-shopped...

Maybe he's getting out the big guns because we have been tough to fool!!!

I just don't wanna wait til friday

[George]

I'm going real on this one.Something about the way sun is shining on it and the shadows on the rear panel.

[Harry P.]

Maybe I used a photo that looks like a model so you'll think that I'm trying to fool you by using a photo that's real but looks like a model...or maybe I'm trying to fool you by using a photo that looks like a model because it is a model and you'd think I wouldn't make it that easy so you'd vote real...or maybe the car is real but looks like a model so you'll vote model even if it's real...or maybe it's real but you vote model because...is your head spinning yet???

[novadose71]

Yes it is.

[ismaelg]

I'd go real because of the reflections on the rear do not follow this light refraction pattern: but rather this other one where h(v) is a function of the distribution histogram:
But on the other hand however, by applying the Jacobian transformation to the Gamma distribution: the result says possibly model.

So bottom line:
What the heck do I know? I guess real so I have a 50% chance

Thanks,

[Harry P.]

I'd go real because of the reflections on the rear do not follow this light refraction pattern: but rather this other one where h(v) is a function of the distribution histogram:
But on the other hand however, by applying the Jacobian transformation to the Gamma distribution: the result says possibly model.

So bottom line:
What the heck do I know? I guess real so I have a 50% chance

Thanks,

Gotta love the scientific approach!

[parki]

Oh my god guys! now I'm more than confused!? Who let Stephen hawking onto the forum?

Anyways I'm going to say model. Just doesn't look real enough to me. But hey what do I know?

[dub]

Maybe I used a photo that looks like a model so you'll think that I'm trying to fool you by using a photo that's real but looks like a model...or maybe I'm trying to fool you by using a photo that looks like a model because it is a model and you'd think I wouldn't make it that easy so you'd vote real...or maybe the car is real but looks like a model so you'll vote model even if it's real...or maybe it's real but you vote model because...

Too funny! These words were floating around in my head as I typed the earlier response.

[MrObsessive]

I'd go real because of the reflections on the rear do not follow this light refraction pattern: but rather this other one where h(v) is a function of the distribution histogram:
But on the other hand however, by applying the Jacobian transformation to the Gamma distribution: the result says possibly model.

So bottom line:
What the heck do I know? I guess real so I have a 50% chance

Thanks,

!!! ??? hehehee

OH! My vote?...............I was mesmerized by that Rube Goldbergish type formula!! Uh..............I vote model!

[plasticgas]

Looks like a model so I'm voting real!

[Chromecop]

I'd say it's the real thing!

[Peter Lombardo]

I voted model for two reasons. 1. I think the background is too far out of focus for a unretouched real car and 2. I do not see any nounting holes/brackets for the rear license plate. But I realize that you could have made the backgound out of focus intentionaly and you could have photoshopped the mounting holes out for the rear plate....so therefore in the end it is a guess. P.S. something about the breakline just in front of the left front fender looks more like the platform that a model would be sitting on then a road/sidewalk break. Ok, technically thats three reasons...shoot me. It's still just a guess.

[kelson]

i say it's a model, but very hard to tell.

[Mr. Metallic]

perfect 6 for 6 so far, but I'm anticipating it coming to an end any day now. I say model

and so it has, bummer. I can never be perfect again.

Edited by Mr. Metallic, 05 October 2007 - 12:47 PM.

[ABC Auto Industry]

I think it's a model because there's a little spot near the front bumper where the guy forgot to Photoshop the edge of the surface of whatever the car was standing on so it blended in with the road. Take a good look & you'll see what I mean.