Jump to content


The Best Car Ever Tested?


  • You cannot reply to this topic
155 replies to this topic

#101 2002p51

2002p51

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 701 posts
  • Location:Kingsport, TN
  • Full Name:Drew

Posted 10 May 2013 - 02:21 PM

 

So, how long is the "complete list" of green companies that AREN'T failing?

 

 

Don't know, I can't seem to find a specific list of successful green energy companies. And that in itself might be the answer to your question.

 

The fact remains that oil, coal, and natural gas are still the most efficient, cheapest, and abundant sources of energy we have and it will be so for the foreseeable future. It's estimated that there is a 300 year supply of oil under Alaska if only the environmentalists would let us get at it. And if we don't build the Keystone pipeline all that Canadian oil will go to China and not stay in the ground.

 

Wind and solar are fine ideas but the cost vs. return are still too high for them to be viable for wide scale usage. We'll get there eventually but probably not in our lifetime.



#102 JM485

JM485

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 509 posts
  • Location:California
  • Full Name:Josh Mouzakis

Posted 10 May 2013 - 02:32 PM

Drew I have to agree with you.  Alaska and the Keystone pipeline are definitely things that need to be looked at, and I honestly can't figure out why we are not taking advantage of them. :huh:  



#103 Ace-Garageguy

Ace-Garageguy

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,401 posts
  • Location:Down two, then left.
  • Full Name:Bill Engwer

Posted 10 May 2013 - 02:34 PM

 

 

Don't know, I can't seem to find a specific list of successful green energy companies. And that in itself might be the answer to your question.

 

The fact remains that oil, coal, and natural gas are still the most efficient, cheapest, and abundant sources of energy we have and it will be so for the foreseeable future. It's estimated that there is a 300 year supply of oil under Alaska if only the environmentalists would let us get at it. And if we don't build the Keystone pipeline all that Canadian oil will go to China and not stay in the ground.

 

Wind and solar are fine ideas but the cost vs. return are still too high for them to be viable for wide scale usage. We'll get there eventually but probably not in our lifetime.

 

Being informed is sometimes good. Read posts 93 and 96 and follow the links to some REAL information about energy cost. Former energy secretary Chu doesn't seem to agree with your position either.


Edited by Ace-Garageguy, 10 May 2013 - 02:50 PM.


#104 2002p51

2002p51

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 701 posts
  • Location:Kingsport, TN
  • Full Name:Drew

Posted 10 May 2013 - 02:48 PM

Yea I read those, I've also driven out Interstate 10 from Banning to Palm Springs, California and seen those hundreds of wind generators out there, most of which are standing still, not being used. Same thing up around Davis and Tracy, California.

 

And I remember the plans to install a few hundred wind generators off the coast of Martha's Vineyard and those wealthy residents up there got the project killed because they didn't want them spoiling the view.



#105 Harry P.

Harry P.

    MCM Ohana

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,864 posts
  • Location:NW suburban Chicago
  • Full Name:A mere layman...

Posted 10 May 2013 - 03:03 PM

It's estimated that there is a 300 year supply of oil under Alaska if only the environmentalists would let us get at it.

 

And by my estimation we have a perpetual source of solar and wind energy.



#106 Danno

Danno

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,106 posts
  • Location:Okay. By now you all know ~ Aridzona.
  • Full Name:Nameless Natural Luminary

Posted 10 May 2013 - 03:04 PM

I think this thread SHOULD have been titled, "The Best Cat Ever Tasted?"

 

Far more fun. 



#107 Ace-Garageguy

Ace-Garageguy

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,401 posts
  • Location:Down two, then left.
  • Full Name:Bill Engwer

Posted 10 May 2013 - 03:20 PM

I think this thread SHOULD have been titled, "The Best Cat Ever Tasted?"

 

Far more fun. 

 

Click here:

 

http://www.ooze.com/ooze13/cats.html


Edited by Ace-Garageguy, 10 May 2013 - 03:21 PM.


#108 JM485

JM485

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 509 posts
  • Location:California
  • Full Name:Josh Mouzakis

Posted 10 May 2013 - 04:09 PM

Yea I read those, I've also driven out Interstate 10 from Banning to Palm Springs, California and seen those hundreds of wind generators out there, most of which are standing still, not being used. Same thing up around Davis and Tracy, California.

 

And I remember the plans to install a few hundred wind generators off the coast of Martha's Vineyard and those wealthy residents up there got the project killed because they didn't want them spoiling the view.

I live right in between these areas and consistently drive both ways to go to varies MX tracks, and I can honestly say that at any given time there are a lot that are not moving.  I don't know if I would say that most are not moving because there are a few rare times that I have seen almost all of them spinning quickly, but most of the time it seems like the majority are standing still.  It really just depends on the day.



#109 lordairgtar

lordairgtar

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,656 posts
  • Location:Muskego Wisconsin

Posted 10 May 2013 - 06:53 PM

There is one of these cars floating around Milwaukee. I did not know what it was when I saw it, but I was driving the freeway when this sedan whisks by and I could not make out the emblem on the trunk lid. I assumed it was some kind of tree. Very good looking car and I just liked it the minute I saw it. Now I know what it is.



#110 lordairgtar

lordairgtar

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,656 posts
  • Location:Muskego Wisconsin

Posted 10 May 2013 - 07:03 PM

 

This is one of those "agree to disagree" things. Refining oil creates pollution. Generating electricity creates pollution.

 

But a gas-powered car creates pollution in addition to the pollution created by the process of providing that car with its fuel (gas).

 

An electric car does not create pollution in addition to the pollution created by the process of providing that car with its "fuel" (electricity).

But what about the spent battery pack? Does not the disposal of it cause some waste problems?



#111 bigmikevee

bigmikevee

    MCM Avid Poster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 497 posts
  • Location:South Texas...almost in the Gulf.
  • Full Name:Ma-Ma-Ma....Mike Verona

Posted 10 May 2013 - 08:33 PM

Hey Gang,

 

There is a tremendous amount of intelligent, thoughtful, insightful, forward-thinking and social-eco-responsibility on this topic, and I for one, have benefitted from all who have taken the time to share their knowledge and viewpoints with their fellow forum-ites. Taking care of mother earth is serious but not without pitfalls. Build something that makes a difference and something that I can fit in, and I would be interested.

 

But, if I may, I drive a Tahoe because I don't fit in much else. Big carbon footprint, and I don't like it, but I don't have an option given my size.

 

There is a guy who passes by my house in a smart car every day, I truly admire his contribution to a cleaner, better environment, but.......if I am using my leafblower when it goes by, it blows it into my neighbors yard. Then I have to walk over, pick it up and put it back on the road, kinda like a big slotcar going off the track. I think it will fit in the Tahoe as a backup plan, like a spare tire with a radio and air.

 

Or, I might just take it, paint it orange, stick a confederate flag on the roof and send it to DANNO, who can take it out for some fried cat sticks...... :mellow: 

 

Mike



#112 2002p51

2002p51

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 701 posts
  • Location:Kingsport, TN
  • Full Name:Drew

Posted 10 May 2013 - 11:35 PM

 

And by my estimation we have a perpetual source of solar and wind energy.

 

That's very true but, at least for right now, it still costs too much to turn it into electricity.



#113 Ace-Garageguy

Ace-Garageguy

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,401 posts
  • Location:Down two, then left.
  • Full Name:Bill Engwer

Posted 11 May 2013 - 03:34 AM

 

That's very true but, at least for right now, it still costs too much to turn it into electricity.

 

In some parts of the country, and the WORLD, SOLAR is ALREADY at cost PARITY with conventional grid power. That means it costs the SAME.

And it's coming on fast everywhere. http://www.triplepun...rity-next-year/

 

Electricity from WIND isn't far behind. Most current projections expect cost parity by 2016. According to Bloomberg's energy analysts, the best wind installations were ALREADY producing power at grid-cost parity in 2011, and the average wind farm will be there in 3 years.  http://bnef.com/PressReleases/view/172

 

Renewable energy will only continue to come DOWN in price if more plants are built and put online. Stalling, head-in-the-sand policies and popular mis-conceptions will simply delay progress towards a rationally sustainable energy future.


Edited by Ace-Garageguy, 11 May 2013 - 03:44 AM.


#114 Ace-Garageguy

Ace-Garageguy

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,401 posts
  • Location:Down two, then left.
  • Full Name:Bill Engwer

Posted 11 May 2013 - 03:39 AM

But what about the spent battery pack? Does not the disposal of it cause some waste problems?

 

Another very good question. IF the manufacturer designs for ease of closed-loop recylability, disposal eventually becomes a non-issue. Here's Tesla's position on the question.

 

http://www.teslamoto...cycling-program


Edited by Ace-Garageguy, 11 May 2013 - 03:45 AM.


#115 Harry P.

Harry P.

    MCM Ohana

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,864 posts
  • Location:NW suburban Chicago
  • Full Name:A mere layman...

Posted 11 May 2013 - 03:41 AM

I agree with Bill... price will continue to drop as more and more solar and wind sources come online. Like I said in an earlier post, harnessing the sun and the wind (two sources of energy we'll never run out of) is just too logical to ignore. And even better... we can use our solar power and our wind power. We won't have to buy either from countries that don't like us!

 

And in the meantime... let's get that darn Keystone pipeline built!



#116 Ace-Garageguy

Ace-Garageguy

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,401 posts
  • Location:Down two, then left.
  • Full Name:Bill Engwer

Posted 11 May 2013 - 03:52 AM

And to echo Harry's earlier question, why is America content to lag behind much of the world in developing clean and infinitely available energy sources ?

 

"Germany now has five times as much solar power as the U.S., despite the fact that the levels of sunshine it receives are more comparable to Alaska than Arizona, or even Florida (which is closer to Spain).

China is growing faster than any other country and is expected to surpass Germany and take the number one spot this year."

 

quoted from Triple Pundit, March 18, 2013


Edited by Ace-Garageguy, 11 May 2013 - 03:52 AM.


#117 vypurr59

vypurr59

    MCM Avid Poster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 332 posts
  • Location:Cleveland Ohio USA
  • Full Name:Jeff Shorter

Posted 11 May 2013 - 04:00 AM

I live in Ohio, and we have Lake Erie. There is talk of a wind farm there. All it is, is talk. The activists are already trying to kill legislation.  Enviornmental impact on the Lake??  from building wind towers?? come on, I was too young to remember when this Lake and the Cuyahoga river caught fire.  What was the cause, pollutants from the steel mills, electric generation plants, and storm drains, that emptied into these vessels, before the EPA started. Now the river and Lake are clean(at least enough for usage).  I have looked into the costs, to put up a wind generator in my backyard.  For a generator to supply my needs would cost in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.  I would have these costs offset, by supplying the grid, with the overproduction of electricity, within the first 5 years.  But then comes the part they don't tell you.  STORAGE BATTERY REPLACEMENT AND DISPOSAL COSTS.  Again, these are one of the highest expenses.  A junkyard in my area, erected a wind tower, so I have talked to him. He has had his paid for, by the power company, as a test. He has told me that every time he calls the company for battery maintenance, it costs him so much, that he had to lease his tower to recoup those costs.  

So again, one "Green" portion of this equation still has to rely on "WASTEFUL" technology.



#118 Ace-Garageguy

Ace-Garageguy

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,401 posts
  • Location:Down two, then left.
  • Full Name:Bill Engwer

Posted 11 May 2013 - 04:07 AM

I live in Ohio, and we have Lake Erie. There is talk of a wind farm there. All it is, is talk. The activists are already trying to kill legislation.  Enviornmental impact on the Lake??  from building wind towers?? come on, I was too young to remember when this Lake and the Cuyahoga river caught fire.  What was the cause, pollutants from the steel mills, electric generation plants, and storm drains, that emptied into these vessels, before the EPA started. Now the river and Lake are clean(at least enough for usage).  I have looked into the costs, to put up a wind generator in my backyard.  For a generator to supply my needs would cost in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.  I would have these costs offset, by supplying the grid, with the overproduction of electricity, within the first 5 years.  But then comes the part they don't tell you.  STORAGE BATTERY REPLACEMENT AND DISPOSAL COSTS.  Again, these are one of the highest expenses.  A junkyard in my area, erected a wind tower, so I have talked to him. He has had his paid for, by the power company, as a test. He has told me that every time he calls the company for battery maintenance, it costs him so much, that he had to lease his tower to recoup those costs.  

So again, one "Green" portion of this equation still has to rely on "WASTEFUL" technology.

 

Your "hundreds of thousands of dollars" price quote seems extremely high. Tell me what your power requirements are and I'll get you the right numbers.

 

As far as battery maintenance and replacement, batteries are NOT necessary for a grid-connected wind or solar installation. Batteries are only necessary for an OFF-GRID, stand alone location. There seems to be some confusion as to how the technologies dovetail.


Edited by Ace-Garageguy, 11 May 2013 - 04:26 AM.


#119 Harry P.

Harry P.

    MCM Ohana

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,864 posts
  • Location:NW suburban Chicago
  • Full Name:A mere layman...

Posted 11 May 2013 - 05:16 AM

Right. Batteries are storage devices. Wind or solar-generated power sold as a utility to the end user would not need any storage devices (batteries). Just as conventionally-produced electricity doesn't need batteries. It's transmitted from the generation station to your home (in several steps), but no batteries are involved. Whether you would get your electricity from a coal-fired plant or a solar array, the power would just "be there" until you flip the switch on to use it.



#120 Danno

Danno

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,106 posts
  • Location:Okay. By now you all know ~ Aridzona.
  • Full Name:Nameless Natural Luminary

Posted 11 May 2013 - 06:27 AM

 

 

Or, I might just take it, paint it orange, stick a confederate flag on the roof and send it to DANNO, who can take it out for some fried cat sticks...... :mellow: 

 

Mike

 

 

 

ROTFLMAOOL!