Jump to content


1974 Econoline


  • You cannot reply to this topic
65 replies to this topic

#1 Repstock

Repstock

    MCM Avid Poster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 443 posts
  • Location:Central Ohio
  • Full Name:Tom Ellifritt

Posted 03 August 2013 - 08:32 AM

I'm working on a 1974 Econoline. The shape has been roughed in, detailing to come. Since I want more than one  :rolleyes: , I  am going to see about having this cast. I have a caster in mind who I think would be happy to do this one. The bottom view is to show that I'm trying to keep the inside nice in case a builder would want to detail it. I'll post more as more gets done.

Econoline74_zps1f7a9e9d.jpg?t=1375553399

Econoline741_zps22a870da.jpg?t=137555339Econoline742_zps978f8229.jpg?t=137555339Econoline743_zpsf3994af3.jpg?t=137555340



#2 GTMust

GTMust

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,018 posts
  • Location:Belleville, Ontario, Canada
  • Full Name:Tony Durham

Posted 03 August 2013 - 08:41 AM

This is a great start to what could become a very popular item. I'm surprised no manufacturer ever (?) issued a kit of this van.

Keep up the good work!

Tony

#3 b_lever1

b_lever1

    MCM Avid Poster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 455 posts
  • Location:portage la prairie manitoba canada
  • Full Name:bob leverington

Posted 03 August 2013 - 08:48 AM

MPC did as the Wizard if Iremember right it was 1/20  a tad bit big  Get it cast PLEASE !!!!!!! check out 70's Custom van CBP in the fourms


Edited by b_lever1, 03 August 2013 - 08:49 AM.


#4 Eshaver

Eshaver

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,871 posts
  • Location:Richmond Virginia for now
  • Full Name:Ed Shaver

Posted 03 August 2013 - 08:51 AM

Tom, if you're doing this one in the 1-24th scale , I'm definitely interested in buying several of these vans . I'm scared off by resin prices usually. With a "Bull Nose " Ford , I'm going to borrow the money if I have to  own the several vans I have enjoyed over the years with this body style .



#5 jeffb

jeffb

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 845 posts
  • Location:detroit

Posted 03 August 2013 - 09:19 AM

nice work tom! i had one of those in high school. my girlfriends grandad wouldnt let her go out with me if i came over in it. i had to pick her up my my 64 comet, then go home and get the van :)



#6 Casey

Casey

    MCM Ohana

  • Moderator
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,305 posts
  • Location:Milwaukee, WI
  • Full Name:Casey Littmann

Posted 03 August 2013 - 09:24 AM

Tom, if you're doing this one in the 1-24th scale 

 

Looks like it's based on the 1/25 AMT '75-1/2 Ford van.  :)



#7 Repstock

Repstock

    MCM Avid Poster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 443 posts
  • Location:Central Ohio
  • Full Name:Tom Ellifritt

Posted 03 August 2013 - 09:50 AM

Tom, if you're doing this one in the 1-24th scale , I'm definitely interested in buying several of these vans . I'm scared off by resin prices usually. With a "Bull Nose " Ford , I'm going to borrow the money if I have to  own the several vans I have enjoyed over the years with this body style .

I guess I could have mentioned the scale. Sorry about that. It's 1/25.


Edited by Repstock, 03 August 2013 - 09:51 AM.


#8 Eshaver

Eshaver

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,871 posts
  • Location:Richmond Virginia for now
  • Full Name:Ed Shaver

Posted 03 August 2013 - 10:47 AM

Tom, if ya do this one in resin, be sure an LET ME KNOW ASAP!!!!!!!!!!! . This is one resin body I will buy and probably more than one too. IO used to have a 70SWB, a 69 LWB E-300, a 70 SWB display side , and a 73 SWB with a slide side , first year they did one . Now If I could find a Rust free SWB with a 240........................



#9 mikemodeler

mikemodeler

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,046 posts
  • Location:NASCAR Country!
  • Full Name:Classified

Posted 03 August 2013 - 03:54 PM

Another great one in the works, I could be interested in a resin copy too!



#10 1972coronet

1972coronet

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,449 posts
  • Location:Murrieta (South-West Riverside County) , Ca
  • Full Name:John Shoe

Posted 04 August 2013 - 08:51 AM

 

Looks like it's based on the 1/25 AMT '75-1/2 Ford van.  :)

I'm thinking its basis is actually the AMT Chevy Van ... ;)



#11 Rob Hall

Rob Hall

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,191 posts
  • Location:Phoenix, Arizona
  • Full Name:Robert Hall

Posted 04 August 2013 - 08:57 AM

I'm thinking its basis is actually the AMT Chevy Van ... ;)

Looks more like he started w/ the AMT Ford van...you can see the side crease and taillight shapes in the 2nd pic...



#12 tomsheehy

tomsheehy

    MCM Friend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 169 posts
  • Location:Delmarva
  • Full Name:Tom Sheehy

Posted 04 August 2013 - 01:02 PM

A very fine addition to the resin world.  I'm sure it will do well in sales.  I'll be sure to track one down, too.



#13 1972coronet

1972coronet

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,449 posts
  • Location:Murrieta (South-West Riverside County) , Ca
  • Full Name:John Shoe

Posted 05 August 2013 - 05:21 AM

Looks more like he started w/ the AMT Ford van...you can see the side crease and taillight shapes in the 2nd pic...

Hmm ... I definitely see that its rear clip does have the E-Van's characteristics to it . I was basing my assessment upon the front clip ; doesn't its doors and slider look like the Chevy van's ? Look at the recessed door handles on both .

So , yeah , probably a conglomeration of two kits .

Cool , no matter what !

( BTW , I would love to get my mitts on one of the MPC 20th scale E's , as long as its factory stock building options are present !)



#14 Tom Geiger

Tom Geiger

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,614 posts
  • Location:Exton, PA
  • Full Name:Tom Geiger

Posted 06 August 2013 - 02:53 AM

This is a great start to what could become a very popular item. I'm surprised no manufacturer ever (?) issued a kit of this van.
 

 

There was one done in 1/20 scale as the Ironsides van. There was also the below diecast in 1/24 scale...

 

DSC00022-vi.jpg



#15 Eshaver

Eshaver

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,871 posts
  • Location:Richmond Virginia for now
  • Full Name:Ed Shaver

Posted 06 August 2013 - 09:22 AM

Tom, I see you have one of the 1-24th scale Ford Econolines Wal Wurl sold several years back.. I stripped the paint on mine cause I thought the graphics were kinda cheesey. Overall, the details were actually very nice . The interior was strange with the large Bench in back though ...........



#16 Tom Geiger

Tom Geiger

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,614 posts
  • Location:Exton, PA
  • Full Name:Tom Geiger

Posted 06 August 2013 - 03:42 PM

Tom, I see you have one of the 1-24th scale Ford Econolines Wal Wurl sold several years back.. I stripped the paint on mine cause I thought the graphics were kinda cheesey. Overall, the details were actually very nice . The interior was strange with the large Bench in back though ...........

 

Ed, yes I have one and just haven't gotten around to doing something with it yet.  When I bought it there was a shelf full of them. If I had known they'd be scarce I would've bought them all.



#17 Maindrian Pace

Maindrian Pace

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 985 posts
  • Location:Mesa, AZ
  • Full Name:Mike Schnur

Posted 06 August 2013 - 08:05 PM

I bought one of those too, but mine has entirely different cheesey graphics.

 

P8060040_zpscc8276e2.jpg

 

It's kind of primitive, but everything opens.

 

P8060041_zpsb18bf50a.jpg

 

-MJS



#18 Repstock

Repstock

    MCM Avid Poster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 443 posts
  • Location:Central Ohio
  • Full Name:Tom Ellifritt

Posted 06 August 2013 - 09:25 PM

 

There was one done in 1/20 scale as the Ironsides van. There was also the below diecast in 1/24 scale...

 

DSC00022-vi.jpg

It doesn't look too bad except for those roof ribs. They should be indented, not sticking up. The body is also very tall compared to it's length and width. Finally, and on a die cast this is probably too picky, but there's no twin I beam front suspension, it looks like a Chevy van front suspension. That's no worse than the Hess (GMC) training van, which shows the two rear axles as differentials with drive shafts. The van depicted was front wheel drive. 

 

There's no denying this Ford die cast has a certain coolness too it, though. (Cheesy graphics excluded, of course). 



#19 Eshaver

Eshaver

    MCM Ohana

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,871 posts
  • Location:Richmond Virginia for now
  • Full Name:Ed Shaver

Posted 07 August 2013 - 02:23 AM

Tom, probably the true reason behind the chassis engineering is on account of the same company doing a 1971-3 Chevrolet Van at the same time they were doing the 69-74 Ford . Width wise , there were relatively close . I think it's interesting that they chose to do the "Slide side option as it really didn't catch on until the "Super- Snoot", uh 76-91 versions appeared . Oh sure , sliding doors were available from Ford . Chevrolets lousy dual action latches made a lot of , ( MY CUSTOMERS ) livid at the fact that the side door mechanism would break . This was especially true in the very early years of the "Door Extenders ", a product that was mandatory on Chevrolet vans with any kind of a wide tire . If you wanted the Fiberglass flares which I manufactured , yes, you had to run them .

 

Now Tom, are you going to do this van with a 240 six or the 302 V-8? I ask over the fact that there were TWO different Motor boxes that were used . The V-8 box was pointed at the rear and a good four inches shorter over all and came up a little shorter than the six . The six box was set out to allow the driver a greater access than the passenger side , was flat at the rear and was overall somewhat more vertical because of the length of the block and the height . Don't forget too, that the dash was designed two ways as well. The vans WITH a radio had a open slot beneath the radio . Vans without a radio could have had a lockable glove box . In addition, the 69-74 Ford Econolines also were the last to offer a "Flip- Fold " passenger seat too. These were a not too comfortable "Jump seat " with the ability to allow one to fold the back forward and then lift up slightly and fold it so as to allow a long load on the passenger side . Persons wishing air conditioning were treated to a somewhat abysmal set up where the driver got the A/C alright , on their side . There was also a very RARE auxiliary heater option too. It was located under the truck and on the drivers side . Also , in 1969-70, one could have ordered for the last time a Genuine Chrome FULL horn ring too !

 

I used to use my little known options at truck In's years ago when we  would sit around a campfire getting sauced . Dodge also had some interesting quirks of options too.



#20 Repstock

Repstock

    MCM Avid Poster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 443 posts
  • Location:Central Ohio
  • Full Name:Tom Ellifritt

Posted 07 August 2013 - 03:14 AM

Tom, probably the true reason behind the chassis engineering is on account of the same company doing a 1971-3 Chevrolet Van at the same time they were doing the 69-74 Ford . Width wise , there were relatively close . I think it's interesting that they chose to do the "Slide side option as it really didn't catch on until the "Super- Snoot", uh 76-91 versions appeared . Oh sure , sliding doors were available from Ford . Chevrolets lousy dual action latches made a lot of , ( MY CUSTOMERS ) livid at the fact that the side door mechanism would break . This was especially true in the very early years of the "Door Extenders ", a product that was mandatory on Chevrolet vans with any kind of a wide tire . If you wanted the Fiberglass flares which I manufactured , yes, you had to run them .

 

Now Tom, are you going to do this van with a 240 six or the 302 V-8? I ask over the fact that there were TWO different Motor boxes that were used . The V-8 box was pointed at the rear and a good four inches shorter over all and came up a little shorter than the six . The six box was set out to allow the driver a greater access than the passenger side , was flat at the rear and was overall somewhat more vertical because of the length of the block and the height . Don't forget too, that the dash was designed two ways as well. The vans WITH a radio had a open slot beneath the radio . Vans without a radio could have had a lockable glove box . In addition, the 69-74 Ford Econolines also were the last to offer a "Flip- Fold " passenger seat too. These were a not too comfortable "Jump seat " with the ability to allow one to fold the back forward and then lift up slightly and fold it so as to allow a long load on the passenger side . Persons wishing air conditioning were treated to a somewhat abysmal set up where the driver got the A/C alright , on their side . There was also a very RARE auxiliary heater option too. It was located under the truck and on the drivers side . Also , in 1969-70, one could have ordered for the last time a Genuine Chrome FULL horn ring too !

 

I used to use my little known options at truck In's years ago when we  would sit around a campfire getting sauced . Dodge also had some interesting quirks of options too.

I'll probably do a V8 box. The interior detail will be limited to the driver's compartment, and I don't want to put a lot of detail in the chassis. I'm hoping these will be easier to cast and cheaper to purchase that way. Also, there are so many possible variations it would probably be best to leave the details to the builder. I'm thinking this will be about the complexity of a snap kit. No opening hood or doors, etc. The builder can then add his own skills to make it into what he wants. I'm not sure what to do about the suspension, as many builders probably don't have a twin I beam setup laying around in the parts box. Any thoughts on how to handle the chassis?