






Edited by Darin Bastedo, 21 November 2007 - 11:22 AM.
Posted 21 November 2007 - 11:18 AM







Edited by Darin Bastedo, 21 November 2007 - 11:22 AM.
Posted 21 November 2007 - 01:03 PM
Posted 21 November 2007 - 01:55 PM
Posted 21 November 2007 - 02:20 PM
Darin, that is Gorgeous!!
Did you take the roof section off the old Gunze kit? That looks 100% better with the added roof than just a convertible!
I have that kit laying around, and now there's a good reason to build it!![]()

Posted 21 November 2007 - 02:25 PM
Posted 21 November 2007 - 02:46 PM
Posted 22 November 2007 - 08:33 PM
Posted 22 November 2007 - 11:28 PM
Here is a sneak Preview of the master of what I like to call the Shelby Daytona Coupe II. It's a coupe conversion for the Revell Series I roadster....
What do you guys think?




Posted 23 November 2007 - 06:39 PM
Well, since you asked...
Great concept idea!!
::WARNING::
If you are just looking for a pat on the back, stop here!!![]()
Now...
What would make it look better:
The rear spoiler looks a bit too thick, and the rear window,
does not appear to be wide enough.
IE: The rear window, looks as though, it will be flat, or mostly flat.
It should have a complex curve to it, like that of the original Daytona Cobra Coupes
(or Viper GTS Coupes).
replica:
With the flat rear window, it looks more like a Datsun, or Datsun based replica,
than it should.
Replica:
(Personally, I would have tried to leave a bit more structure to the rear panel,
("Deck lid"??)like the Datsun replicas have.
It is a "new"or "updated" concept after all.
The reasoning for this is that
if this car were designed today, I think it would be required,
in case of rear end collision or "spin out". (Crush zones and all that)
I think that, I would have tried to use the Viper GTS's rear window,
if possible, but not the roof.
As this "MAY" have saved time and trouble.
The Viper roof, is no good, as it has "2 humps"
and these make the roof look like a Barbie dolls butt, made into a roof.![]()
This is JMHO yours may very well, vary greatly. HTH![]()
Posted 24 November 2007 - 04:36 AM
I agree with your assesment to a degree, but Just like the 1:1 car manufacturer I had other considerations to take into account when designing this. If it was a one-off I would have gone with a more complex shaped rear window/hatch area, but had I done it on the resin master, we would have had to include a vacuformed window piece adding to the price of the body. I chose a thicker spoiler in the rear to balance out the heaviness of the front end of the car. I think that was one of the faults of the series one roadster is that it looks very nose heavy. The spoiler looks a lot better in person. as far as using the Viper parts go, the series one is a much smaller car than the Viper. The lines just don't match up that well. I appreciate the critique though, and when I build my copy of this I may incorporate some of the changes you suggest.
Posted 15 December 2007 - 01:00 PM
Then soon, ill have one for the days i have moose in my hair HaHahA!. Thanks for heads-up! Keep us posted.Posted 16 December 2007 - 11:54 AM
Posted 27 December 2007 - 10:21 AM
Posted 28 December 2007 - 06:50 AM
I didnt notice that until just now lookin for any updates on the concept Shelby I meant mousse= instead of that heavy coat on my head HaHA good one Ramonsblues!!!How did you get a moose in your hair? That would be very uncomfortable. Heh heh