Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Best E-type kit


Recommended Posts

If you want to build a lightweight low drag coupe, you're best starting from the convertible with the hard top.

Donington%202013%20-%2061.jpg

It's a bit hard to see in this picture (and this is not a real, in-period low drag coupe, but the shape's the same), but the cabin is basically a "teardrop" in plan view, coming more or less to a point in the middle of the boot. The factory hard top with a half-cone behind it is a lot closer to the shape than the coupe. For any lightweight I've ever seen, you'll also need to "flesh out" the rear wings, which always seem to be bulged to accommodate those big fat rear tyres.

Lots of pictures of a real (albeit heavily restored) lightweight low drag coupe here:

http://www.classic-motor-cars.co.uk/restorations/jaguar-e-type-lightweight-“lindner”/

bestest,

M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for "wrong-hand drive", the Revell kit, bless 'em, provides two dashboards (probably because it was tooled in the UK) so you can take your pick. The Heller is drive on the left (unsurprisingly for a French kit) but so is the Gunze (more surprisingly). It's not a horrendous job to flip it, but you have to not only swap sections of the dash, but also the front wall of the footwells...

bestest,

M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does one differentiate between the "Good" Revell kits and the "bad" ? I know their first shot was a rerelease of the Monogram rereleas of the Aurora kits. :huh: First kit (Aurora) Aurora%20566-149%20Jaggd++.JPG second, Monogram TN_01444_01.JPG Revell's , and they even copy the Aurora box art :o1329437870795-1095890042.jpeg Then the "New, even more improved" Revell kits, how does one identify these kits ? :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not so complex... the Aurora, Monogram and Revell-Monogram Coupe's are all the same badly proportioned kit.

The Revell "XK-E" roadster is the one designed and tooled by Revell UK and first released in 1964. Whatever Revell or Revell Germany box it's in, if it's a roadster it's that kit.

And I don't agree with Junkman's comments in the other thread: the Heller Coupe doesn't look too tall to me...

710x360_crop.jpg

Compare that with my profile picture. I think it's an illusion caused by not having the windscreen in place, so the side pillars make you think the screen is much more "upright" than it actually is.. If you were being REALLY picky, you could bring the roofline above the top front corner of the door down a little: the Heller roofline is at it's highest right by the windscreen, whereas the apex of the curve is actually more like the middle of the door, though it's pretty subtle.

bestest,

M.

Edited by Matt Bacon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for "wrong-hand drive", the Revell kit, bless 'em, provides two dashboards (probably because it was tooled in the UK) so you can take your pick. The Heller is drive on the left (unsurprisingly for a French kit) but so is the Gunze (more surprisingly). It's not a horrendous job to flip it, but you have to not only swap sections of the dash, but also the front wall of the footwells...

bestest,

M.

So, the Revell convertible is the one I need to find? Since both the Heller and Gunze kits can only be built with steering wheel on the right? And why would you be surprised Matt that the Gunze is done with the steering wheel on the right? Like the British, the Japanesse drive on the left too. And it's Gunze a Japanesse model company? There are several Japanesse kits I would buy if they offered a way to build them with the steering wheel on the left.

Scott

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...
  • 1 year later...

How does one differentiate between the "Good" Revell kits and the "bad" ? I know their first shot was a rerelease of the Monogram rereleas of the Aurora kits. :huh: First kit (Aurora) Aurora%20566-149%20Jaggd++.JPG second, Monogram TN_01444_01.JPG Revell's , and they even copy the Aurora box art :o1329437870795-1095890042.jpeg Then the "New, even more improved" Revell kits, how does one identify these kits ? :huh:

It's easy. All three above are the Aurora crapp version, as is this roadster...Image result for aurora xke roadster

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The GOOD Revell kit is in these boxes...

Image result for revell xke roadster         Image result for revell xke roadster

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The reason I've dredged up this old thread is 'cause I just bought a Heller E-type as a base for a model of a client's car I just did a bunch of body mods on, and needed compare-contrast info. However, the real car is an S2, and these kits are mostly S1 cars. The main visual difference is the front lighting configuration and the size and shape of the mouth. The S2 and later cars also hang larger lights under the rear bumper.

Edited by Ace-Garageguy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then there's the Series III with the V12 - who's up for a scratchbuild?

Not so hard to do in 1/24, actually.

The SIII is longer through the doors (and tub, of course). The rear wheel-arches have added flared lips. The nose is the same as the SII, more or less, but with the addition of mild wheel-arch flared lips as well.

The 1/24 Hasegawa XJS-V12 has a decent starting point for the engine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not so hard to do in 1/24, actually.

The SIII is longer through the doors (and tub, of course). The rear wheel-arches have added flared lips. The nose is the same as the SII, more or less, but with the addition of mild wheel-arch flared lips as well.

The 1/24 Hasegawa XJS-V12 has a decent starting point for the engine.

I was under the impression that the hood was also longer on the SIII.  I know the more bulged out headlights is different then the S1 kits that have been produced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was under the impression that the hood was also longer on the SIII.  I know the more bulged out headlights is different then the S1 kits that have been produced.

There is a lot of confusion regarding E-type bonnets. There are in fact THREE different designs just for the SI alone...not including the "lightweight" and "aero" versions.

The SII positions the headlights higher relative to the sugar-scoop, with a larger opening in the bonnet skin, and an elaborate chrome surround. The opening for the radiator is also larger.

If I remember correctly, the nominal distance from the rear edge of the bonnet to the center of the wheel arch is identical on all SI-SII-SIII cars. I say "nominal" because each bonnet is individually fitted to each car, so if you buy a replacement; either new or used, chances are very good you'll have a lot of critical fitting to do. The suggested fit time is around 40 hours (!).

Variations in the shape of the center panel of the different series (the bonnet is made up of three major exterior panels and a lot of secondary ones) accounts for relatively minor dofferences in the length of the bonnets overall.

I recently completed the design and fabrication of custom lighting for this car, an SII (now with low-mounted LED projectors in the lower lamp enclosures), custom headlight surrounds, and wire mesh covers. Even the sugarscoops are custom fiberglass fabrications, as are the parking lamp / projector enclosures, trim rings, and the retainer rings for the wire mesh.

This is the only E-type like this on the planet.

 

 

 

DSCN5670.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a lot of confusion regarding E-type bonnets. There are in fact THREE different designs just for the SI alone...not including the "lightweight" and "aero" versions.

The SII positions the headlights higher relative to the sugar-scoop, with a larger opening in the bonnet skin, and an elaborate chrome surround. The opening for the radiator is also larger.

If I remember correctly, the nominal distance from the rear edge of the bonnet to the center of the wheel arch is identical on all SI-SII-SIII cars. I say "nominal" because each bonnet is individually fitted to each car, so if you buy a replacement; either new or used, chances are very good you'll have a lot of critical fitting to do. The suggested fit time is around 40 hours (!).

Variations in the shape of the center panel of the different series (the bonnet is made up of three major exterior panels and a lot of secondary ones) accounts for relatively minor dofferences in the length of the bonnets overall.

I recently completed the design and fabrication of custom lighting for this car, an SII (now with low-mounted LED projectors in the lower lamp enclosures), custom headlight surrounds, and wire mesh covers. Even the sugarscoops are custom fiberglass fabrications, as are the parking lamp / projector enclosures, trim rings, and the retainer rings for the wire mesh.

This is the only E-type like this on the planet.

 

 

 

DSCN5670.JPG

Excellent design, especially that E-types are among my favorites.  Great mods that add some muscle without killing the beauty of the original design.  Did you use the headlights with integrated turn signals?  I have seen those on some TR-6's and it cleans up the front really well.

Have you seen Bo Zolland's redo of the E-type?  He has a special flair that I like in most of his work. Its my understanding this was put into limited production.

Jaguar_E-Type.thumb.jpg.b36cfe74aea4dfc7weblyonheart-k.thumb.jpg.16e247b727d8dc9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent design, especially that E-types are among my favorites.  Great mods that add some muscle without killing the beauty of the original design.  Did you use the headlights with integrated turn signals? 

Thanks. I was also very careful to respect the car's originality. All the mods are designed to be relatively easily reversible, should the owner decide to sell it off if prices continue to rise...though I believe he'll keep it no matter how high they go. Nice thing about the guy...he drives his cars aggressively. The engine in this is uprated from two SU carbs to the earlier 3-carb configuration, with hotter cams and headers. The provenance of this Jag includes time as a European hillclimb / rally car, and it's definitely had a hard life at some point, though the chassis structure has been rebuilt recently, and the interior has been redone in a beautiful dark red leather.

The park / turn lamps on this car, also hyper-bright LEDs, are now located in the outboard segment of the new custom lower light housings, behind custom Lexan lenses. I felt that, to be fully visible when the rest of the lamps were illuminated, this location would be best. The headlights themselves are very bright Euro H4 bulbs, shown illuminated here, as are the LED H1 projectors (visible inboard of the signal lamps).  As you can see, it's still possible to see the turn signal quite distinctly. That's not always the case when the signals are incorporated into the headlights.

And I've been an admirer of Bo Zolland's work for a long time.  :D

 

DSCN5661.JPG

 

Edited by Ace-Garageguy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill... since you've been up close and personal with one recently...

For the larger "mouth", does the whole nose of the bonnet flare a bit to form it, or is it just a larger hole in the same shaped nose? It also looks as though the lower lip drops more, with squarer corners, and the upper curve is closer to the S1 shape. Just wondering whether, if you wanted to do the conversion, you'd need to Milliput around the nose and build up a whole new interior and exterior contour, or is just a matter of expanding the hole and blending in the new edges? I somehow seem to have acquired a couple of scrap e-type coupe bodies, so the cut and shut for extra length is feasible...

best,

M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...For the larger "mouth", does the whole nose of the bonnet flare a bit to form it, or is it just a larger hole in the same shaped nose? It also looks as though the lower lip drops more, with squarer corners, and the upper curve is closer to the S1 shape. Just wondering whether, if you wanted to do the conversion, you'd need to Milliput around the nose and build up a whole new interior and exterior contour, or is just a matter of expanding the hole and blending in the new edges? I somehow seem to have acquired a couple of scrap e-type coupe bodies, so the cut and shut for extra length is feasible...

Excellent questions, and I haven't ever really looked at it very carefully from that perspective.

I'll be back in that shop next week, and should have measuring access to an S I, the black S II shown above, and a recent S III barn find.

The shape of the cutouts for the headlights is also significantly different, and I'll post side-by-side pix on molds I made of the S I chrome rings next to shots of molds of my new S III black rings, with dimensions on everything I can think of.

In the meantime, here's a shot of the S I nose from roughly the same angle as the black S II above.

Image result for Jag XKe series one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Bill.. at first glance from those photos, it looks as though the radius of the lip going into the intake is much tighter on the S2, so maybe from a "look" point of view, you could just sand the oval out to a larger size at the top, and do the same with slightly squared lower corners at the bottom...

best,

M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...