Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum
hpiguy

MPC Dodge 'Country' Charger Open Box Review

Recommended Posts

This is MPC's release of the 'Country' Charger in 1:25th scale.
It's basically a direct re-pop of the long running General Lee kit, all the General Lee parts are included and you'll get an optional set of Torq-Thrust wheels and new flag decals with various names and numbers in the same font as the General Lee car. 
This is molded in all black.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVSucSDHmbA 


 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Chris .......................... But Round2 what are they doing molding it in BLACK  (NO Thank you) !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Chris .......................... But Round2 what are they doing molding it in BLACK  (NO Thank you) !

Better than orange, I suppose.  Though some previous GL versions were molded in white.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Better than orange, I suppose.  Though some previous GL versions were molded in white.  

Not really Black,orange,red, yellow are not fun to paint over ! white would have been better .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice box art with '68/'69 hood. Still an incorrect '69 500/'70 hood in the box though.

Thanks for the great video review. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Meh!  I'll spend my $$$ on the '75 Datsun instead.

Thanks for the preview Chris.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The decal choices are hysterical!  General Washington with a 13 star flag, General Grant, etc.  I was thinking a nice build would be the DOH General Lee with General Grant t-boning into the roof!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The decal choices are hysterical!  General Washington with a 13 star flag, General Grant, etc.  I was thinking a nice build would be the DOH General Lee with General Grant t-boning into the roof!

Think I was going to troll like that, it would have to be called General Sherman.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Round 2 should have picked up an original MPC 1969 Charger annual kit and scanned the body to make a new tool.  It could have been sold with the original 1969 annual artwork.  The original 1969 Charger body was really nice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm wondering, with Round 2's love for licensed subjects, why they did not simply issue these kits as either "Death Proof" or "Drive Angry" Chargers? You can actually build either car pretty faithfully right from the current kit contents (hood and grille inserts nothwithstanding). Those are two movie boxes I would probably pay for!!! They could also do something pretty close to the Ghost Rider car featured in Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D., if they used most of the custom parts from their "Fast and Furious" release several years back. 

FREE MARKETING IDEAS, Round 2!!! I mean, practically all of the parts are there! 3 new releases from this old tool!!

I might just have to make me up some fake boxes!!! 🤔

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Round 2 should have picked up an original MPC 1969 Charger annual kit and scanned the body to make a new tool.  It could have been sold with the original 1969 annual artwork.  The original 1969 Charger body was really nice.

It's somewhat the same body as the original '69 Annual. The scoops in the doors, the cowl vents, the emblems, front fender edges and the rear window have been revised back and forth quite a bit since 1969, so these areas are not too good anymore, but the basic body still has a good shape. Yeah- maybe starting all over would be best?  

The problem is: people like me have been buying this kit, warts and all, pretty consistently over it's run. It's a sentimental favorite of mine, since I first started building as a kid in the '70's. I built TONS of these, converting many of them to stock '68's, Daytonas, race cars, & street machines (fat tires, traction bars, loud paint, the works) back when they were the only game in town.

I think they'll always have some buyers, so there is no real incentive for Round 2 to do any heavy revision to the body. We're lucky as it is that RC2 revised the back window back when they did the Fast & Furious car. I just wish they would find the Charger 500 hood (aka- the real stock one they included in the first issue of the Charger 500 kit, circa 1987), and the original '69 Grille inserts (not the '72's we've been getting all this time). 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The revised rear window that RC2 did definitely made the kit better but it's shape and size isn't accurate.  When the MPC '69 Charger body is compared to a '69 1:1 Charger or to the Revell '69 Charger it's apparent the rear window is too small, not angled correctly and the shape is too squared off.  Also the molding is too wide.

Laste year I built an MPC '69 Charger and I was disappointed with the rear window when I opened the box.  I removed the molding, re-shaped the window and changed the angle slightly so it's a bit more steep.  I also re-shaped the rear pillars.  They were too rounded on the sides.

I attached some pictures showing what I did.  The 1st picture is a comparison of the MPC '69 Charger's rear window(right side) to a Revell '69 Charger's rear window(left side).  The MPC window is noticeably smaller and the shape is off.  The 2nd and 3rd pictures show the re-shaping I did.  

The last picture is an original MPC '69 Charger annual body.  This picture is one Marc(mpcmotorsports) sent me a while ago.  The rear window is correctly shaped.  

It's too bad that someone at RC2 didn't look at reference pictures of actual Chargers when they 'revised' the rear window.

I'm currently building an MPC 1/25 Snap General Lee kit and the rear window is similar to how the MPC (glue kit) looks now.  It's better but still not accurate. 

IMG_5848 Small.jpg

IMG_5887.JPG

IMG_6046 Small.jpg

100_1432-vi.jpg

Edited by crowe-t

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Michael, I agree with all of your points. And you did a great job correcting that body. Now I know it would be worth the effort!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...