Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Salvinos JR Monte Carlo


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Daddyfink said:

It's just a drawing, and not a good one, so I am sure this is not the final piece. 

 

It's not a drawing, it's the CAD rendering that the tooling will be made from...so yes tweaking that opera window should be very easily fixed at this stage.  But "not a good one"...this kit is threatened for September, which makes it dangerously close to the final design if they're gonna get everything done in the next 90 days or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, niteowl7710 said:

It's not a drawing, it's the CAD rendering that the tooling will be made from...so yes tweaking that opera window should be very easily fixed at this stage.  But "not a good one"...this kit is threatened for September, which makes it dangerously close to the final design if they're gonna get everything done in the next 90 days or so.

I will wait until there is actual plastic to look at 

And in reality, it is not that big of a window

Image result for 73 monte carlo

37214901_216799505642570_1700848104808382464_o.jpg.b56d2295e8be013574cd46644d19b571.jpg

Related image

Edited by Daddyfink
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, yellowsportwagon said:

Nobody except Johan has gotten the Colonade body GM windshield right.  The back of the roof on Montes seems difficult too. Never seen a model or diecast I thought was even 90% correct there.

Yup! Any conversion to other divisions of that Colonnade body style should be based on that. While Monogram's Monte Carlo is OK.........it always appeared to me that the cowl area (to the top of the windshield) is a bit "short". I've got two junk bodies in fact of that Monte. I'm saving 'em for future projects as I need the back roof section to make an Olds Cutlass, and down the road a '76-'77 Buick Regal.

No timeline.........just an idea rolling around in my head for a number of months now. ;)

f6hdwcnhx34s74vb.jpeg

Looking at that #11 Olds NASCAR reinforces everything I see wrong in the new Olds NASCAR kit body. I'll hold off judgement of the Monte till I can see good pics of the kit in plastic. Hard to go by 3D images as those can change from now till production.

I'm a bit passionate about these cars...........they were mainly what I saw on the road back when I was learning to drive in the later '70's, and in fact a '77 Olds was our Driver's Ed car back in high school along with a '77 Grand Prix.

Now THAT I'd like to take on as a project someday! B)

I can certainly remember them from new, and while they were not fast cars by any means, they were certainly good looking and one of the few bright spots of '70's cars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/15/2018 at 6:04 PM, niteowl7710 said:

 

 

 

4 hours ago, Daddyfink said:

I will wait until there is actual plastic to look at 

And in reality, it is not that big of a window

 

37214901_216799505642570_1700848104808382464_o.jpg.b56d2295e8be013574cd46644d19b571.jpg

Related image

As can be Sen in the picture of the 1:1 above, there should be a subtle curvature to the B-pillar, not arrow straight as currently shown in their rendering.  Trailing edge of the quarter window also follows this curvature, and yes, the quarter window does need to be a bit wider.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/15/2018 at 6:04 PM, niteowl7710 said:

Well they released the CAD drawings for both versions of the Monte Carlo this afternoon...37214901_216799505642570_1700848104808382464_o.jpg.b56d2295e8be013574cd46644d19b571.jpg37153058_216799628975891_1951597108821753856_o.jpg.5654c65a2898c09082b8a41a30dfe11c.jpg37224050_216799725642548_6294324320894189568_o.jpg.bbb9867cf12ff6a3f26194adfcfff6d3.jpg

37145305_216804035642117_5790587131667677184_o.jpg.0ae1e543d9694f34337975733f4d7b69.jpg37161063_216804042308783_4471835866020446208_o.jpg.6574ed0e9bd3aef6f1b0be22ce031456.jpg

I'm intrigued by the 2 different versions they're showing.  The round-eyed version is a 74-75 model year based on the rear bumper/taillight panel shape.  The four-eyed version is 76-77 model year, with a different rear bumper and taillight panel shape. Only way I see for them to share a common body would be to have separate quarter panel end pieces for each version.  Looks like the 74-75 rear bumper should have some height taken out from the lower section.  They were chunky, but not to the degree shown in their rendering.

Hopefully they realize that they need to create separate front bumpers, too (if they want to make more of an attempt at accuracy than the Olds kit).  The bumper shown on both rendering versions has the 76-77 parking light covers. 74-75 model years had the parking lights next to the headlights in the fender extensions, no openings in the bumper beneath the headlights that would require these covers.

Note also that the 74-75 front bumper wraps around the side and extends back further than the 76-77 style. As currently shown in their renderings, the bumper more closely resembles the 74-75 shape, but with the 76-77 parking light covers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Robberbaron said:

 

As can be Sen in the picture of the 1:1 above, there should be a subtle curvature to the B-pillar, not arrow straight as currently shown in their rendering.  Trailing edge of the quarter window also follows this curvature, and yes, the quarter window does need to be a bit wider.

Yes to the curved opera window.  No to the aft edge of the b-pillar being curved   Look at the real red car above.  The example you are referring to has the flat or concave glass where the race car has convex glass, as does the red car .

Edited by Chris in Berwyn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The early Monte Carlo race bodies and production bodies also used a smaller quarter window. Even pictures of Cale Yarborough's series winning '77 #11 Monte Carlo has just such a window treatment. In the early '80's the windows were enlarged somewhat. I can see that with very little work you could make a Chevelle Laguna race car like Cale's '76 Chevelle which also was the series winner that year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'70 Grandes pic makes it look like the front end has a noticeable drop, especially when looking at the headlight area. Is this due to the image angle or did the car really have that drop? I can't say because I was watching what little drag racing I could find while on base in Okinawa. Had lost interest in NASCAR for a few years. Got back into it when Monogram did their first four NASCAR kits. And still had the interest in drag racing, so the drag kits that Monogram did were added to the beginning of the "stash" also!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, socal76 said:

'70 Grandes pic makes it look like the front end has a noticeable drop, especially when looking at the headlight area. Is this due to the image angle or did the car really have that drop? I can't say because I was watching what little drag racing I could find while on base in Okinawa. Had lost interest in NASCAR for a few years. Got back into it when Monogram did their first four NASCAR kits. And still had the interest in drag racing, so the drag kits that Monogram did were added to the beginning of the "stash" also!!

At that time many NASCAR teams used liberal interpretations of stock body shapes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...