Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

32 ford


Brudda

Recommended Posts

Thank you lowlife. Thank you David G. Thank you mod3l Lover. And Claude that is a beautiful car! Here is another pic of the seats temporarily in the car. I really do not know how this will turn out. Just doing a little at a time. The chopped top was a first for me, then I opened the doors , another first. So a lot of first time things going on here. Hence , I do not know how this is going to go. In modeling , things can go bad real fast. Still have more modifications on the floor. 

 

A97F156F-97B6-4EB0-9C9D-5B63C2F76FA5.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Claude Thibodeau said:

Hi!

Well, everything seems to fall in place wonderfully, isn't it? Think twice, cut once, enjoy forever!

CT

Oh yes sir! This is what I do for a living. Repair corvettes. At a Chevy dealer. Measure lot and cut once. Frame is all aluminum. Doing a section. The pic is a 2017 corvette convertible.

080CAC1B-AD8C-4C12-885B-415646088C61.jpeg

35E80978-4FBB-440D-9550-7A01DAF47BEB.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Brudda said:

Oh yes sir! This is what I do for a living. Repair corvettes. At a Chevy dealer. Measure lot and cut once. Frame is all aluminum. Doing a section. The pic is a 2017 corvette convertible.

080CAC1B-AD8C-4C12-885B-415646088C61.jpeg

35E80978-4FBB-440D-9550-7A01DAF47BEB.jpeg

So you like Vettes........

This was my last one. By the time I sold it, it was well on the way to be the only all carbon fiber bodied C5 in US. The only thing that was not carbon at the time I sold it were the doors. 

 

E7156A72-A5D3-4DB0-93B0-55EEC9D05EFC.jpeg

E381DE67-EC4B-48E2-9EA6-C8A7407E65A9.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you 1930 ford pickup. I’m going to put wire in the rocker panels. A lot of stress there.  Removed the stock motor mounts. Putting motor mounts for the flathead. And a trans mount. Fitting for driveshaft. Cut out the grill. Going to use a photoetch grill. Filled the floor notches for the side panels. Just fitting and cutting and sanding. Was trying to do this before our weather gets bad. I will be ready to prime and paint next week. Snow is predicted for that time. Figures, Still looking for a color. Maybe maroon. I still do not know

6CDBAA7B-AEC9-446B-8D68-1A425E83F1A4.jpeg

297838A8-D52E-4DEE-BE26-1FCEE6099BF8.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/18/2019 at 1:28 PM, Claude Thibodeau said:

Hi Delton!

Not to argue, but the pearl base you refer to from HOK is Passion Purple. It's a straight base-coat, designed to be topped by HOK urethane candy. My car actually had a silver base coat under the Burple candy color. (see picture). However, it may indeed have a slight difference from the color I saw on the model above, which would make sense, since it is not the exact same paint. I just indicated it reminded me of HOK's Burple. Nothing more...

Regards,

CT

33 Boise 4.jpg

Claude, HOK has Passion Purple, and Pavo Purple as pearl base coats but unless they have discontinued it fairly recent they also have a "Burple"metallic pearl, that color was used to paint the Maxwell House Thunderbird that was driven in NASCAR competition by Sterlin Marlin. The old color book I have still has it shown, but it is from 1998.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, horsepower said:

Claude, HOK has Passion Purple, and Pavo Purple as pearl base coats but unless they have discontinued it fairly recent they also have a "Burple"metallic pearl, that color was used to paint the Maxwell House Thunderbird that was driven in NASCAR competition by Sterlin Marlin. The old color book I have still has it shown, but it is from 1998.

Hi Delton!

Thanks for the update. My own brochures date back around 96. I'm sure they expanded the range and variety of Burple products, because it was very popular back then on custom Harleys I was painting... 

CT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Claude Thibodeau said:

Hi Delton!

Thanks for the update. My own brochures date back around 96. I'm sure they expanded the range and variety of Burple products, because it was very popular back then on custom Harleys I was painting... 

CT

What's a little curious is Ford had almost the same exact color and Testors still has it in the factory match colors (at least our Hobby Lobby still has it on the shelf and hasn't put it in the discontinued sales yet). It's Fords "True Violet, a and it is hard to tell if it's blue or purple in the light.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, horsepower said:

What's a little curious is Ford had almost the same exact color and Testors still has it in the factory match colors (at least our Hobby Lobby still has it on the shelf and hasn't put it in the discontinued sales yet). It's Fords "True Violet, a and it is hard to tell if it's blue or purple in the light.

Hi!

I used that very color to paint some frame hardware on the 33 Ford pictures above, thinking it would be an almost exact match... but it was not. It had a pinkish or magenta hue under certain light circumstances, whereas the Burple remained more "blue", or darker. I remember that there were numerous Ford Escorts and Ranger PU in that hue. Nice color in itself, but no true "Burple". alas...

CT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Put the flathead motor mounts in. The top loader fits nicely. A lot of room for the radiator , fan and hoses. The motor fits up against the firewall . With the flush firewall gives a little more clearance. Have to make headers. Modified the trans mount. Things are going nice so far. I moved the front crossmember forward a little. A longer wheelbase. 

2EFBA996-72A5-4F07-A824-2AF247275E49.jpeg

A5B888D0-46F7-4D91-A2BC-38EE14DE56E7.jpeg

D1B02EBF-B2BF-4433-8024-3FD9C2CAC53C.jpeg

AF693D72-B73F-4841-91D1-54D89F3D4EBF.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks good, but a little puzzling to me. Why mount the flathead so far back and then move the front crossmember forward? Stretching the front hood would be in tune with something post Boyd era To accommodate an inboard shock arrangement or to accommodate a 12 cylinder. With the very traditional, so-far, style with bomber seats, flathead V8 mated to that tranny and skinny old school wheel/tire combo, it kinda doesn’t jive. I am not criticizing, but being  curious. Are you hiding something up your sleeve? 

Edited by mrm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mrm said:

Looks good, but a little puzzling to me. Why mount the flathead so far back and then move the front crossmember forward? Stretching the front hood would be in tune with something post Boyd era To accommodate an inboard shock arrangement or to accommodate a 12 cylinder. With the very traditional, so-far, style with bomber seats, flathead V8 mated to that tranny and skinny old school wheel/tire combo, it kinda doesn’t jive. I am not criticizing, but being  curious. Are you hiding something up your sleeve? 

Hi!

To your point, many old timers exended their wheelbase nonetheless on these 32s, if only to have a better ride. Let's not forget that those cars were, engineering wise, almost farm tractors... No offense meant here, cause I had a real 32 3W, and I extended the WB by 3 inches, and never regretted it! 

Besides, the famous Harley Earl of GM design fame kept calling for "longer, lower, wider!". Case in point: my 32 Speedwagon with 32 Chrysler front fenders and smoothed hood.

Long and low, way to go!

CT

DSCF3825 (2).JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Claude Thibodeau said:

Hi!

To your point, many old timers exended their wheelbase nonetheless on these 32s, if only to have a better ride. Let's not forget that those cars were, engineering wise, almost farm tractors... No offense meant here, cause I had a real 32 3W, and I extended the WB by 3 inches, and never regretted it! 

Besides, the famous Harley Earl of GM design fame kept calling for "longer, lower, wider!". Case in point: my 32 Speedwagon with 32 Chrysler front fenders and smoothed hood.

Long and low, way to go!

CT

DSCF3825 (2).JPG

I understand very well what you are saying, but your woody (great looking model by the way, altho a little too long) is a completely different style and looks from a completely different era in hot rodding, than what Bruce is showing do far.

 My Seeet Victoria model has it’s wheel base stretched about 3 scale inches. The main reason for it was accommodating that big motor and it is still very tight under the hood. But what Bruce is doing is moving the firewall slightly back, moving a flathead V8 considerably back and moving the crossmember and grille considerably forward. That would be far more than 3 inches in real life. I am the biggest fan of the Boydster look (which you have achieved with your woody model), but this here is nowhere near in the same spirit. It is rather hinting at a different supercharger arrangement perhaps, which is why I was asking what is Bruce hiding up his sleeve. 

Edited by mrm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mrm said:

I understand very well what you are saying, but your woody (great looking model by the way, altho a little too long) is a completely different style and looks from a completely different era in hot rodding, than what Bruce is showing do far.

 My Seeet Victoria model has it’s wheel base stretched about 3 scale inches. The main reason for it was accommodating that big motor and it is still very tight under the hood. But what Bruce is doing is moving the firewall slightly back, moving a flathead V8 considerably back and moving the crossmember and grille considerably forward. That would be far more than 3 inches in real life. I am the biggest fan of the Boydster look (which you have achieved with your woody model), but this here is nowhere near in the same spirit. It is rather hinting at a different supercharger arrangement perhaps, which is why I was asking what is Bruce hiding up his sleeve. 

Hi!

Points well taken.

I know Mr. Coddington had a woody version of his Boydster sketched for a customer... but I don't know if he ever actually built it before his passing. Mine was indeed inspired by that very sketch. 

CT

32 woodie a.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, mrm said:

Looks good, but a little puzzling to me. Why mount the flathead so far back and then move the front crossmember forward? Stretching the front hood would be in tune with something post Boyd era To accommodate an inboard shock arrangement or to accommodate a 12 cylinder. With the very traditional, so-far, style with bomber seats, flathead V8 mated to that tranny and skinny old school wheel/tire combo, it kinda doesn’t jive. I am not criticizing, but being  curious. Are you hiding something up your sleeve? 

Gives me a little more room for maybe a blower .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Claude Thibodeau said:

Hi!

Points well taken.

I know Mr. Coddington had a woody version of his Boydster sketched for a customer... but I don't know if he ever actually built it before his passing. Mine was indeed inspired by that very sketch. 

CT

32 woodie a.jpg

Yea

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...
On 11/28/2019 at 5:15 PM, Claude Thibodeau said:

Hi!

Points well taken.

I know Mr. Coddington had a woody version of his Boydster sketched for a customer... but I don't know if he ever actually built it before his passing. Mine was indeed inspired by that very sketch. 

CT

32 woodie a.jpg

That’s really cool - I was trying to find out if he ever did a Coupe version of a Boydster - this is the closest I’ve seen so far!

Back on topic, great looking build @Brudda - would love to see some more progress on this one!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, CabDriver said:

That’s really cool - I was trying to find out if he ever did a Coupe version of a Boydster - this is the closest I’ve seen so far!

Back on topic, great looking build @Brudda - would love to see some more progress on this one!

Hi Jim!

To my knowledge, the closest thing to a "Boydster" coupe would be the famous 33 Ford Coupe Mr. Coddington built for a customer in the early 80's, and won the Al Slonaker's  award with at the Oakland Roadster Show. The car was penned by Thon Taylor, of course. A timeless design.

Boyd also built a car for Michael Anthony, of Van Halen's fame. Testor's sold it as the "Flamed coupe" for a while. Rare and hard to come by nowadays... 

The main component of the Boydster look, aside extended nose, of course, is the sliced and tilted forward body, that considerably reduces the height of the body sides. The Alloway Speedstar and Kugel Muraoc roadsters were of the same design school. 

CT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...