Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

RIP Cayenne


Recommended Posts

So that means that they should of never made the 911 either? you know, since it has four seats as well ;)

Good point..the 356 and 911 have been 4 seaters, as were their front engine sports cars...they've had a few 2 seat models like the Boxster, Cayman, Speedster, 550 Spyder, Carrera GT...but the 'volume' models have been mostly been 4 seat sports cars until the Cayenne and Panamera.

Edited by Rob Hall
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good point..the 356 and 911 have been 4 seaters, as were their front engine sports cars...they've had a few 2 seat models like the Boxster, Cayman, Speedster, 550 Spyder, Carrera GT...but the 'volume' models have been mostly been 4 seat sports cars until the Cayenne and Panamera.

They may have rear seats, but the only people that can fit are kids or little people :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They may have rear seats, but the only people that can fit are kids or little people :lol:

Definitely tight...a friend had child seats in the back of his 911 when his kids were small... I rode in the back of a '76 911 once, had to sit crossways w/ my feet on the seat and head ducked...very tight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who wrote the law that Porsche is only allowed to make sports cars?

Sports cars are what the company was built on...it's rich history is all about sports cars and success in sports car racing. When Porsche was still independent, it added the Cayenne (with some platform sharing w/ VW) as a profit center (cynically cashing in on the overheated SUV/CUV market boom of the last decade).

Now that Porsche is fully part of the VW family, it really doesn't need the Cayenne or the Panamera, as those overlap with Audi models. But they are adding yet another SUV soon.

Consider Ferrari--they make sports and GT cars only, they don't do SUVs or luxury sedans. Jeep doesn't make sports cars or sedans. Porsche should be the same way, IMO...maintain the brand vision and focus.

Edited by Rob Hall
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sports cars are what the company was built on...it's rich history is all about sports cars and success in sports car racing. When Porsche was still independent, it added the Cayenne (with some platform sharing w/ VW) as a profit center (cynically cashing in on the overheated SUV/CUV market boom of the last decade).

Now that Porsche is fully part of the VW family, it really doesn't need the Cayenne or the Panamera, as those overlap with Audi models. But they are adding yet another SUV soon.

Consider Ferrari--they make sports and GT cars only, they don't do SUVs or luxury sedans. Jeep doesn't make sports cars or sedans. Porsche should be the same way, IMO...maintain the brand vision and focus.

Yeah, I can see the logic in that argument.

But I can also see the logic in the Porsche braintrust sitting around a big conference table and saying, hey, we should maybe try to expand the brand... you know, appeal to a wider consumer base and not artificially limit ourselves to a tiny sliver of the consumer pie by building only sports cars. We could sell a lot more cars if we also offered a 4-door and an SUV alongside our sports car models. There are people out there that would love to own a vehicle with the "Porsche" name but want something other than a sports car.

Both are perfectly logical ways to go. Porsche chose to expand the brand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...