Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

unclescott58

Members
  • Posts

    10,602
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by unclescott58

  1. On 8/27/2022 at 10:44 AM, Bill Eh? said:

    Here's a YouTube video of a build up by BG's Model Workshop

     

    Wow! A great review. And a great build. I had not run across this video in my search for info on this kit. I’m pleased to see what to look out for when building the kit. Hopefully helping me avoid pitfalls when I get around to building mine. And its nice to see it can be build into a fairly nice looking representation of a 917. 

    Thank you for the link to that one Bill. A good… no a great find. 

  2. 10 hours ago, crazyjim said:

    I like the sleeper look.

     

    9 hours ago, oldscool said:

    Beautiful! Just the way I would want one.

     

    5 hours ago, espo said:

    I like thew theme here. Clean but subdued looking ride with everything under the hood. 

     

    5 hours ago, TransAmMike said:

    Defiately a sleeper, cool!!

     

    4 hours ago, happy grumpy said:

    Beautiful sleeper, The perfect car for a youngster who doesn't want to draw too much attention from the police ,Discrete, but not to be messed with. Great job sir.

     

    4 hours ago, Classicgas said:

    Nice. Wish I hadn't traded mine.

     

    1 hour ago, Hemifever said:

    Plain Jane, I like it.

     

    1 hour ago, rsmodels said:

    Very nice work! It looks just like a car you would have seen at the grocery store back in the day-until you open the hood and look closer. I really like it.

    Wow! Thank you for your kind words guys. 

  3. 21 hours ago, vintagerpm said:

    Not a very accurate kit. Which is strange considering how good the 917/10K kit is.

     

    As I write this I’m finishing up my 1/32 scale AMT 917/10 kit. And your right, it is a very good kit. I’m applying Indycal decals to make in to George Follmer’s, Porsche 917/10-003. The RC Cola version. Great decals by the way. They are going down great. Giving me no troubles so far. 

    I bring this up because you question the difference in quality of the two 1/32 Porsches? MPC’s 917K vs AMT’s 917/10. It’s my understanding they are from two totally different sources. MPC’s was a re-boxed Airfix kit. AMT’s is a kit was tooled up by Matchbox. If I’m wrong on this, somebody needs to correct me. 

     

    image.jpg

    • Like 1
  4. 8 minutes ago, dodgefever said:

    Whoever/whatever generated the subtitles isn't much good with Scottish accents either, they're comical. ?  These old Airfix kits aren't bad, I built a few back in the day.

    I did not try watching it with subtitles. I didn’t even think of that. An interesting video. Again not a great one. But, the only one out there, that I’ve found, looking at this kit. 

  5. 11 minutes ago, Modlbldr said:

    Yeah, when I was looking at some reference photos on-line for this build I came across that.

    I was also in the process of making a radio antenna for it and looked on-line to find out where it goes but never found a photo of one with an antenna. It surprised me. (Also saved me some time since I din't need to put on on the build. Lol)

    Later-

    ‘70 Chevys had their factory antennas built into the windshield. The first year for that feature on Chevrolets. 

     

    6C45A777-8249-4BA5-9075-E4803BE53EB1.jpeg

    • Like 1
  6. This my Revell ‘64 Ford Fairlane Thunderbolt. The reason I posted it here instead with the drag racers, is this car is really not intended to be use on the drag strip. It’s a sleeper/street racer. And sometimes grocery getter. A “plane Jane” car that most people would notice until it was too late. The only clue is the 427 Thunderbird engine badges on the front fenders. 

     

    EB4EEDAE-52C1-4192-9C24-F2D45E20A2F7.jpeg

    5439E528-B08D-4B5B-8FE9-B8E0EDD4FA1D.jpeg

    928F019C-3CF5-4B22-9DC3-6801DBBCF7A0.jpeg

    3430080D-BB51-4E1E-BA90-C01C930D98BA.jpeg

    426A2545-1068-4994-A223-A7D4300B6215.jpeg

    • Like 3
  7. On 8/26/2022 at 5:10 PM, Bill Eh? said:

    Here's a Youtube video of the kit, its Airfix release history and contents. Contents start at about 3:30.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVP__dIq_o4&ab_channel=ModelScaleKits

     

    Yea, I saw the video you linked to, earlier today. Not bad. But, I had a bit of a hard time understanding what the presenter was saying. Other than that, it was an okay review of the kit’s history and contents. Not great. But, one of the few reviews out there that I too can find on the kit. 

    I’d love to see more reviews. And perhaps a build up or two. 

  8. On 8/21/2022 at 11:12 PM, unclescott58 said:

    I did not see this on the road, because its not legal to drive on the road. Nor did I see it today. I saw this on Friday, and this is the first chance I’ve had to share the pictures. I was kindly invited this last spring to come to Tom Maruska’s shop and see his latest restoration. I’ve been admiring his work years, up at the Motor Madness Shows, every March, in Duluth MN, for many years now. Tom does some of the most beautiful restorations I’ve ever seen. Including several magnificent Thunderbirds. And including the 1963 Thunderbird Italian concept car. Plus the 1954 Mercury XM-800. Now he has just finished restoring the 1956 Mercury show car, the XM Turnpike Cruiser. And Wow! What a beauty. Much prettier in real life, than in any of photos I’ve ever seen of the car in the past. 

    Tom has done his normal marvelous magic on this car. If your interested in learn more about it, you see articles on the work he’s done in recent issues of Old Cars Weekly. Or you can check it out his website at TPLS62@MSN.COM. 

    Thanks to Tom for kindly inviting me to his shop, and letting me see this magnificent car in the flesh. Plus seeing his beautiful 1963 Thunderbird convertible again. And an interesting future project he’s working on. That I’m looking forward to seeing done in the future. 

     

    C34D52CA-B604-47DE-847E-7B5EBCDFCFED.jpeg

    96548DD2-8103-4810-B943-9798996FD076.jpeg

    8989E18B-6306-49DC-B7DD-8E239A286E83.jpeg

    DBEEAC31-CAE2-4DDF-B9E4-357F82C7C8AE.jpeg

    5E957A84-FA7E-49E3-A46A-4FDF7922E90E.jpeg

    72EF9734-8DE4-4B90-B86A-07CA857277A4.jpeg

    5F853A1D-509B-4EAF-8B54-B6A9B26A0AB3.jpeg

    913E885E-7F09-46EC-8948-2D0B53E1D7B3.jpeg

    4AD01F5F-7489-4D9E-8937-52C5FEFDAA5F.jpeg

    6BAC337D-F81B-4F4A-A579-814BEACF9B7B.jpeg

    As a follow up to seeing the car above. That afternoon, I got curious and started doing more research on the XM Turnpike Cruiser. I discovered there was a pamphlet that Mercury made out on the car. I assume to be given out where ever the car might appear. I have several pamphlets on other show cars from the period. So I than went on eBay to see if I could find one. And there were several available, so I bought one. It came in today’s mail, and I thought I would share it with you. 

     

    FE98A053-6AB1-4E40-9C95-9D972FF0E92F.jpeg

    FD6C4DA9-4B78-4587-93A2-577DCD3BBCD3.jpeg

    18986DC8-8E3B-40BD-85D5-91C1864FD6FF.jpeg

    04421A9D-A30D-42BC-883E-518FC4459A9B.jpeg

  9. 13 minutes ago, espo said:

    I think the box art was designed to better show the car in the kit that is being trailered than how it would be done in the real world. 

    I suspect your correct. And I think the folks at AMT were right for doing it that way. It looks great, and different from Cal Drag Combo. Plus when this kit came out, I knew nothing about towing trailers with cars on them or not. It looked good to me then. And from an “art” perspective, still looks good now. 

    • Like 1
  10. I just ordered this kit from a vendor on eBay. From what little I can find on the web, it’s a reboxing of an Airfix kit, and looks okay. When I get the kit, I’ll open the box and show the contents here. In the mean time, I’d be interested in hearing other’s opinions on this. The good. The bad. Or the ugly. 

    I have ordered Indycal decals for this kit. Gulf-Porsche #20, raced at Spa. As I don’t like what I’ve seen of the decals included with the kit. Nor do I trust them after almost 50 years. 

     

    4DC7B1B0-E228-4932-ACC0-63BE9B141D3D.jpeg

    • Like 1
  11. On 1/3/2019 at 11:07 AM, Casey said:

    ^This. Not even interested in building the Craftsman '63 Impala...chevelledragteam.jpg.e765bad278048b606e83a931a66caf85.jpgchevelledragteam2.jpg.e2483aba4a5f4da668c328a116804d5c.jpg

    I’ve towed a car or two on both trailers and car dollies back in my day. The thing that bothers me on the above box art, wouldn’t towing the Chevelle backwards on the trailer like that, give the tail wagging the dog effect? At the suggestion of a boss one time, I was to tow a car on a dolly backwards. I could barely leave the lot and a vehicle I was towing start wagging back and forth. Which in turn started effecting the tow vehicle’s handling. “The tail of the dog, wagging the dog.” Enough to scared me into refusing to do the run. Our service manage then tried it, and came back and said he wouldn’t do if he were asked, either. The weight bias with the engine facing backwards is what caused the problem. Now this was with using a car dolly. Maybe with a double axle trailer it would be different. But, having towed cars with both open and enclosed double axle trailers in the past, I doubt it. Still, even if it wouldn’t work in real life, the box art above still looks great. And I’d buy one if reissued. 

  12. On 8/21/2022 at 11:17 PM, Doug 1061 said:

    That came out real nice.  Always nice to be able to get a redo of these old kits.  I have a few AMT trucks that I got to do over to make up for the ones I butchered when I was a young'un.   I really wish I still had some of my  models from back then.  But like many of us on here mine met the their fate with fireworks.

    Thank you Doug. It is fun to get a “redo” on kits one built as a kid. And hopefully do a better job with them. 

  13. 12 hours ago, keyser said:

    Lol. Since we offer nothing new evidently, try one of these. Let us know. I’m rooting’ for Stewie ??https://www.linkedin.com/in/georgelyonseriepa

    Mr Lyons restored it. 

     

     

     

    9CD63C76-9C53-4595-B30A-1EAAC37BBE20.jpeg

    1F98FD8B-CA58-4B35-B93A-30D239EF8189.jpeg

    Okay now I’m confused. Why am I recommend to go to this site? Your right I’ve never seen this guys site before. I see he’s restoring a Watson roadster. A cool Indy car. The type that won Indy in 1963.

  14. 3 hours ago, Stef said:

    My pleasure, @unclescott58. I too noticed the exhaust headers, but didn't know what to make of that. I know nothing about this era of racing, outside of what I saw in FORD v FERRARI, ha ha.

    And as for the red seats, I did see at least one shot of both white and green cars, with red seats:

    https://www.indycals.net/decals/indy/63lotus29.html

    Aside from that, I've not found many colour photos of the real Gurney car; I'm unsure what colour seat it's supposed to have.

    Another site I’ve been to in the past. And another good one worth sharing with others here. Still questioning the red seats. But, that’s okay. I’ve thought about buying their decals. The price seems right. And from what I’ve seen their quality is good too. 

×
×
  • Create New...