Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

peteski

Members
  • Posts

    8,359
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by peteski

  1. Not to sound grumpy or anything, but there seems to be a national Day just about for anything.  I would have imagined that we have already ran out of the days of the year for yet another National Day.  This is getting silly.  Not that there is anything wrong with mutts (or any other things celebrated on all those National Days), but do we really have to celebrate all those things?! Bah-humbug!  :D

  2. Sorry about your health.  Like others have said,most of us will be in your predicament at some point in time.

    I'm lucky that I belong to a model club. We had few members pass away, and we as a club help out in liquidating their models.  Any profits made from selling them goes back to the widow or we also donate it to causes like Toys for Tots.

    One possibility you can consider is donating your kits to the active military forces.  My club has done that few times. Cost of shipping (APOs or AFOs) is minimal.

    More info is available at http://www.ipmsusa.org/support_the_troops/index.shtml

  3. On 8/31/2018 at 7:47 PM, Rider said:

    I miss seeing the huge luxury cars that went away in late '70's. Lincoln MarkV's were 19'3" long, the front fenders were close to 7'.

    IMG_5315.PNG

     

    On 8/31/2018 at 8:54 PM, slusher said:

    I had a 77 Thunderbird best driving car I ever owned. Bought it in 84. Plenty of Room...black looked just like the Internet picture..

    image.jpeg

    Yes, that Lincoln Mk. V is one of my favorite cars too.  I love the sleek and angular lines and the long hood/short back proportions. I saw one this weekend at https://www.cruisingdowntown.com/ . It was sort of salmon color.  My 1985 Eldorado is few feet shorter, but still has the same look.   I showed it at the Cruising Downtown and heard lots of positive comments and reminiscing from the public.

    I also owned a '77 T-bird (cream/brown) for few years.  It was a pretty car and a very comfy ride.  Again, long hood/short truck proportions. Makes the car look good and sleek.

  4. 1 hour ago, fumi said:

    The interior is on the shallow side, but doesn't look too horrible.  But the flat dashboard with a decal over it is weird!  Maybe someone will come out with a 3-D printed replacement.  The body seems to look good (to my non-expert eyes).

    img_2_m.jpg.c86413d2a850a9debbe9dbf293b27930.jpg

    EDIT:  I translated those Japanese blogs and the model featured in the blog is the model released in the '80s.  Maybe the current release will have a better dash and interior?  One could hope.

  5. 20 minutes ago, Pete J. said:

    No, I can't either, but I can see someone putting a WRX Sti through a rehab, or perhaps a Camaro or Corvette.  Not every car is deserving of being carried forward.  You don't see a lot loving restorations of Pintos, Mavericks or Valiants.  There are unloved cars from every era.  Don't judge all, by one.  There are a lot of great, exciting cars out there that will have a cult following in 2045.

    Come on guys, lets get real here. The way the technology is advancing, by 2045 everybody will be into virtual reality (similar to the holodeck on the U.S.S. Enterprise in the Star Trek TNG).  Nobody will want to get their hands dirty messing around with some ancient automobile carcass.   If there still are any gearheds left, they will work on virtual vehicles in their holographic simulation of a garage or a racetrack. The young generation even now is not all that thrilled with driving or even owning a vehicle.  Driving to them is a huge distraction taking them away from their communicators, and actually owing a vehicle is too complicated and too expensive.

    Then there is the infrastructure. By 2045 all the vehicles (cars. trucks and personal transport pods) will be all electric, self-driving, and all the roadways will have been by then adapted specifically to those vehicles.  They will all be traveling most efficient way, and the most efficient speed.  Old manually-controlled and gas-powered cars will not be allowed into the autonomous vehicle collective on the roadways.  I'm glad that I will likely not be around to witness all of this in person.

    Going back to the past, I actually prefer seeing those unloved vehicles restored and exhibited at car shows. If I see bunch of '57 Chevys, '60s Vettes and G nicely restored Gremlin, Pinto Wagon, or a Pacer, guess which cars I will walk by, and which will stop and look at?  Yes, the unloved ones because in this day to me they are rare and unique. Chevys and Vettes are dime-a-dozen at any car show.  When I attend cruises in my 1985 Caddy Eldorado Biarritz (yes, it is 33 years old already), my car is most often the only one like at the cruise. My Caddy it is 33 years old now, which is the same age as a 1957 Chevy was in 1990, but it is not considered a classic vehicle. Probably will never be either. But I don't care.

  6. Welcome to the forum Łukaszu!  Good to see you get back in the hobby.  I'm sure you'll get plenty of good advice from the forum's members.

    I can't help noticing that you have unmistakably Polish name, and you have your location listed as Bristol.  Is that in UK?

  7. 12 hours ago, Snake45 said:

    Yes, it can remove enamel, though it might not in the time it would take to remove tape residue. 

    Also, keep it away from clear styrene. It seems to have the weird property of "soaking into" plastic and making it brittle. The slightest pressure or torque will induce permanent stress cracks in the clear styrene, and can even make it crumble like a cookie. I've had it happen. (The plastic seems to be okay again after it's dried out for several days, though, but of course any induced stress cracks will remain.)

    I use lighter fluid for an airbrush paint thinner for enamels sometimes, as it has some properties that I like. But I keep it away from bare styrene these days. 

    I agree on all counts.  Ronsonol is pure Naphtha which is the same as VM&P Naphtha (Varnish Maker's & Painter's Naphtha) is a mild solvent sold in hardware stores (and much cheaper than Ronsonol) I get mine in gallon size can.  Since it can be used as thinner, it can attack enamel paints like Testors (but lacquers are more resistant to it).  It is excellent as a degrease and for removing pressure-sensitive adhesives (like what is used by masking tape).  I often use it to clean non-clear styrene parts prior to painting them.

    Here is more info:

    http://www.kleanstrip.com/product/vmp-naphtha

    Also do a Google search for "vm&p naphtha"

     

    Naphtha-gallon-GVM46-900_300_300_80.jpg

  8. 5 hours ago, iamsuperdan said:

    . . .

    I love tech. I love my bluetooth, I won't buy a vehicle without heated seats and a remote starter, and I get disappointed if it doesn't have cooled seats. I need a big stereo, and I need the best headlights available. Despite all that, I miss the availability of simple vehicles. I remember growing up, my dad would only buy simple cars; partially because he was cheap, partially because he just doesn't like all that foo foo stuff. I don't think they'd be huge sellers, but imagine how awesome that would be if Dodge introduced a Challenger with no AC, no power windows, mirrors, touch screens, no big stereo, no LEDs, no fancy heavy 20" wheels. No heavy power seated seats, less sound deadening, less plastic trim under the hood. Big engine, manual transmission, crank windows. I'd love it.

    . . .

    I'm a bit confused. So do you love tech, or simplicity, in a *contemporary* car?    It sounds like you really love your gadgets, but if they made a simple stripped car you would forgo all your conveniences and love to own a simple car? Or you would love it for others to buy and drive such car?  You can't have it both ways .

  9. Great to see those Aoshima MGs finally reissued - they fetch ridiculous prices on eBay!  I have one from 1998 when it was imported by American SATCO!  Speaking of SATCO, boy do I miss all those nice tire sets they offered.  I have a feeling that they were all made by some Japanese kit manufacturer.

  10. I have 2 Dremels. I use one handheld while the  other one  has a flex shaft attached.  I then hung  it on a home-made stand.  Went to Home Depot and bought piece of electrical conduit, a 90 degree elbow and some coupling pieces.  I then used 2 conduit brackets to mount the vertical piece to the shelf on my bench. The Dremel is suspended by a chain threaded into the conduit. It is held in the conduit by a removable pin made from a pip-rivet.  That way I can easily adjust the height of the setup.  The photos shows that setup on a very rare occasion when my workbench was just cleaned.

    DSCN1766.thumb.JPG.06acfeede681a31687aa2728877cddb1.JPG

×
×
  • Create New...