peteski
-
Posts
8,430 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Posts posted by peteski
-
-
My CA application methods are described in the following post: https://www.modelcarsmag.com/forums/topic/165362-ca-glue-wells/#comment-2469163 If you look at the CA bottles in the photo you can see some of that CA fogging we have been discussing here.
-
2 hours ago, Wickersham Humble said:
PS/ Due to a hacker, I had to change my email address, so my forum status is back to rookie Jr, Woodchuck!
You could have contacted the forums moderators to help you to go back to your original account (and probably even merge your new posts to the original account. They are a helpful bunch. To me that makes more sense than starting fresh Mr. Humble.
-
1
-
-
Over the years there have been multiple threads with techniques for making better headlights. It would l be nice is someone compiled them all into a single collection. Here is one of them:
-
Tommy, yes the topic was started in 2008, but have you looked at the last page of the posts? Latest posts are from December 2024 (just few days ago). That is why I when I pointed you to that thread I specifically stated "Looking at the last page or so of posts in there should give you some ideas. "
-
On 12/21/2024 at 12:45 PM, Tom Geiger said:
I swear some folks hit the "Buy It Now" button, then go out to their mailbox to see if it has magically appeared! 🙂
You're supposed to be like amazon - same day delivery (soon by a drone).
-
2
-
-
I often see "frost" forming on plastic (polyethylene) CA glue bottles in extended storage in humid environment. The frost even extends onto the surrounding surfaces. Seems that CA has the ability to permeate the polyethylene because the bottles are not open (airtight). The frosting even shows up on metal or glass surfaces (like what Alfred shows). I don't think it is due to VOC contents. I'm not a chemist but I believe VOC is really about solvent evaporation. CA is a liquid resin which hardens by polymerization - it doesn't contain a solvent.
-
Here are some older topics related to vintage hobby paints. Fun stuff!
-
Once enamel type of paint turns into gel or rubbery clump it cannot be revived. You can add some type of thinner, but the paint will not turn into usable liquid again. Even if you mix it back into liquid state, the liquid will consist of very small chunks of the gelled enamel paint. Not usable. That is because when enamel dries (actually hardens) it goes through a irreversible chemical reaction. If enamels are still in viscous liquid state (not gelled) they adding thinner will still make them usable.
Thickened or dried lacquer paints on the other hand can be readily be made usable again by adding the appropriate thinner to them. That is because lacquers dry solely by solvent evaporation.
-
2
-
-
Tommy, there is a sticky thread dedicated to the Future. Looking at the last page or so of posts in there should give you some ideas. Why reinvent the thread?
-
Yes, you did this correctly. What you painted is the trim/gaskets. However, most contemporary cars also have the windshield and rear window perimeter area painted on the inside - check your own car to see that. And if you are tinting the windows that is also best done from the inside.
-
1
-
-
Yes, I also thought that was a very useful issue of FSM. Lots of good techniques covered .
-
While I'm not a big smart phone user, I believe that there are camera apps available for both Apple and Android-based smart phones, and they can be used in addition to the default camera app which comes pre-installed. Those apps should enable more customization than the default app, so things like custom color balance, aperture control (if the camera hardware is so equipped) and other advanced settings. Basically the settings which are available on dedicated cameras. That should allow for even better quality smart phone photos. But the basics like ample lighting and composition are still needed for producing good photos.
-
2
-
-
On 12/16/2024 at 8:24 AM, Ace-Garageguy said:
The "warm" whites render distinctly yellowish when photographed if not offset by at least one "daylight" bulb.
Most cameras (maybe even smart phones) have adjustable "color balance" or "white balance", so they will compensate for the light source's color temperature. Many cameras have manual color balance option, where you put a piece of white color material (like blank sheet of paper). The camera will take a sample of that and apply whatever color compensation is needed to produce truest colors possible for that light source. I use that setting for pretty much all the photos I take under artificial lighting. It works better than just selecting one of the preset color balance choices. Utilizing non-automatic color balance will result in good color even with the warm or bluish light sources.
-
1 hour ago, Ace-Garageguy said:
I use two soft whites (which are more blue) and one daylight (more yellow). It's very bright, like I said, and you can put the light exactly where you need it.
Hmm, in my experience "soft" or "warm" white is 2600K color temperature (yellowish incandescent-like), and daylight is 4500K or higher (harsh bluish white). Some bulbs are rated for 3000K and that is basically the type of light you get from halogen lamps (not yellowish and not bluish).
Also color rendering index (CRI) which is usually specified on brand name bulbs, makes a difference how true the colors are rendered. I recommend CRI or 85 or higher (the higher the number (up to 100) is how well various colors will be rendered.
Here is my quick and dirty photo setup. I am using the magnifier light with a 3000K kitchens and baths fluorescent bulb. It actually has pretty good color rendering capability. I always preset the white balance on my camera for that bulb to maximize the color accuracy. If I need better quality photos I use two 250W halogen work lights with a diffuser to soften the shadows. That is how I also take the contest photos I submit to the magazines (but for those I use larger stage area).
-
1
-
-
33 minutes ago, LennyB said:
Try this one
Probably early 20th Century Stanley Steamer, but I cheated because the name is on the gauges, and one gauge mentions "boiler pressure".
-
8 hours ago, slusher said:
I go to a hobby shop that I have don business wit several times for hail and someone hit my wifes rear bumper 3 times. Anyway I ask for paper they give me 4 ft lasts a a while..
What exactly does this mean Carl?
-
That was amusing, but I wonder if you got dinged because of sepllinng errors?
-
Yes Mike, you are going into the that rabbit hole.
But what we are really discussing here is simple hobby photography. Most modelers will likely not do much cropping or using digital zoom (which as you said reduces the resolution of the final image). To me the DOF is still the most important parameter for model photography, so the ability to control the aperture and select aperture property shooting model is vital. But most phone cameras have very small diameter lenses and they produce quite good DOF without even having the ability to control the f-stop. I have not looked into the science of this but it seems to work.
Also the photos we are discussing here basically need to be good enough to be posted to forums. Even if sent to magazines, they are likely published in quarter-page (sometimes maybe half-page) size. A 5 x 7 (or roughly half-page) 300dpi photo only needs to have 1500 x 2100 pixels resolution. In camera talk that is around 3Mp. That is very realistically achievable, even after cropping, with pretty much most consumer cameras (including phone cameras). Do we really need to take 48Mp photos and even after cropping still end up with 15Mb images?
Also, many magazines are now printed on equipment which uses stochastic printing method (not the typical halftone printing). But this is getting way out of topic for this discussion.
-
Sounds to me like it is your airbrushing technique. The plastic is the same on the sides as it is on the horizontal surfaces. What you describe seems that you just aren't putting heavy enough of a coat on the horizontal surfaces to get the paint to level out to a smooth surface.
Or possibly just the opposite: Maybe the Scale Finishes paint is hot, and you end up using a heavier coat on the horizontal surfaces, causing the plastic to slightly craze.
Just couple of guesses. . .
-
2
-
-
11 hours ago, iBorg said:
For print, resolution is an issue but most modern phone cameras will reproduce reasonably well for a 4 x 6 or maybe a 5 x 7 printed image.
Just up to 5 x 7 prints? Mike, I don't think the resolution of iPhones is an issue. Maybe with the original iPhones, but current iPhones have very high res image sensors. I don't own an iPhone but I think they now have 12 or 24 Megapixel sensor. Even my 20-year old Nikon CoolPix 8700 camera with 8Mp sensor can produce very sharp 8x10 enlargements. Images from newer iPhones could be used for good quality poster-size enlargements.
Main thing is getting sufficient DOF (depth of field) so the entire subject is in acceptable focus. This is done by selecting appropriate lens and using numerically highest f-stop aperture. That requires bright lighting and often slow shutter speeds (so a tripod is needed).
Photos of contest coverage done using my old Nikon are good enough to have been published in modeling magazines (like Model Cars and SAE Contest Cars Annual) for decades. For examples see http://classicplastic.org/show-2024.html
-
2
-
-
33 minutes ago, RancheroSteve said:
Just my personal preference maybe, but I prefer to use a wide angle - I think it better simulates the way cars are photographed in static situations and how the eye sees them. Appears more realistic to my eye, which I think is what we're all aiming for. Just be careful you don't get your shadow in the photo!
Yes, telephoto flattens the image while wide angle lens will exaggerate the perspective, making the model look more like a larger vehicle.
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, oldcarfan said:
Apparently someone tried to use ink jet paper and it wrecked something expensive in the printer.
Yes, that special ink-absorbing coating on the ink jet decal paper can get melted on the the laser printer's hot fuser roller, messing it up.
-
6 hours ago, Mike 1017 said:
I strip paint with Order Free Easy Off it works for me. I am kinda confused about it not working
Mike
Mike, if you read that post again it states "The odor free Easy-Off does not have Lye and will not work for stripping paint." Basically what I mentioned that the low-odor Easy-Off does not contain Lye and will not strip paint like the original stinky Easy-Off.
-
The paint stripping ingredient in Castrol Super Clean (CSC) and in the original Easy-Off spray is Lye (Sodium Hydroxide). The odor free Easy-Off does nto have Lye and will not work for stripping paint. CSC is really the best thing to use since it comes as a liquid which does not need to be sprayed (spraying is what contaminates the air with the nasty fumes).
-
1
-
Replacement for Future
in Model Building Questions and Answers
Posted · Edited by peteski
True (at least in USA), but give a Man a Fish, and You Feed Him for a Day. Teach a Man To Fish (look through the forum for answers,even in very old threads), and You Feed Him (information) for a Lifetime.
Instant gratification is so overrated Rick.