robdebie

Ah! No window at all, that would (could) explain a sliding panel. 'Tim Ahlborn spotters guide' sounded familiar, and indeed I had bookmarked his site: http://www.timstrucks.com/PB1.html But I get a "Not Authorized to View This Page [CFN #0004]" message. Hurray for the Wayback Machine: http://web.archive.org/web/20200201070755/http://www.timstrucks.com/PB1.html. This page has a picture of the rear side of the pre-1960 351 cab, with a caption reading "This view shows the pre 1960 cab. Note the slider rear window, the drip rail that surrounds the roof of the cab." There's a month-old video of Tim Ahlborn on YouTube, so he's still active. Rob

Interesting question for sure! But I don't think I know of another area in everyday life than paint that uses such vague terminology. Like eteski's example: "paints which are not enamels" - sigh.. 'Enamel' itself is another vague description - why not use the technically correct name 'alkyd paint' since alkyd plus oils are the carrier? Many modelers in my club call enamels 'oil paints', because they are derived from crude oil. With that reasoning acylics are oil paints too. Another sigh.. One I haven't cracked yet are 'acrylic enamels'.. Rob

I'm 99% sure that the combined effect of isopropyl and an ultrasonic bath will solve your problem. Just look how clean my enamel painted IH cab is after a caustic soda / ultrasonic cleaning. It had several layers of 25+ old paint on it. All the nooks and crannies are clean, and there was zero brushing or tooth-picking action. More here: https://robdebie.home.xs4all.nl/models/ultrasonic.htm Rob

My research roughly matches yours. I knew from the start it would be a lot of work to backdate the 359 to a 281. I may have showed it before, but here are the windshield gasket that were step one. I made a small mistake: the gaskets should touch in the middle. But they are glued in, too late now. Regarding the sliding panel in the rear window, do you (or anyone else) have an idea why it was made sliding? I cannot think of a good reason. Rob

Another question about the Duel truck. When the truck is down in the ravine, the back side of the cab can be clearly seen. I've drawn what I see in the righthand picture. It looks like a sliding panel rear window, different from the later window, like in the AMT kit. Some kind of mounting of the swamp cooler is also visible. I could find only very few Peterbilts with this rear window setup. Here's a screenshot from a YouTube video. My question: what is the part on the right side? Is it a sliding panel maybe? But why? Rob

A belated thanks for the information! Let the sanding begin.. Rob

Another question for my slow 'Duel' truck build: was the cabin of the Peterbilt 281 riveted like the AMT 359 kit, that I'm using? I guess the 281 had a spot welded steel cabin. Rob

If you enjoy that kind of stuff: I have an extensive research page, showing the evolution of Humbrol tins: https://robdebie.home.xs4all.nl/models/humbrol.htm Since the design changed so often, it can also be used to establish the approximate age of your old tins. I'm often amazed how old the paint is. Like when I painted this 3D printed object: the tins are from (approximately) 1993, 2000 and 1979. I must have been in primary school when I bought the oldest tin. Rob

'Kit glass' is of a similar thickness. 0.1 mm is literally paper-thin. Rob

I used 1.0 mm PETG sheet for the side windows of my 'Blues Brothers' Pinto Wagon. It's normally used for vacuum forming, and comes with sticky foils on either side for protection. Rob

Fujimi often does 'optical corrections' to their models, so it's not totally surprising. But in this case it takes away the picture of a tiny cockpit with a giant engine behind it. I haven't finished my Heller 917K, nor the Profil24 1969 Langheck (prototype). Too busy moving from one project to another 🙂 Here's the status of the Heller kit: Rob

Hi Allen, long time ago! I can answer your question: the Fujimi model is some 4 mm too wide, from the nose to the rear cockpit bulkhead. Put the Fujimi and Heller models next to each other, and you'll see how much wider the Fujimi kit is. Since the nose section is too wide, the rear half appears to be too narrow, but it's approximately correct. The resin sets 'correct' that by adding even more width. Sigh.. This shape problem is too big for me, so I prefer the old Heller kit. But most modelers don't care much about shapes, or 'see' them, so your mileage may vary. The Heller kit requires more than average attention though, it's a bit of a French diva. I measured the Heller kit extensively, and it's very close to the published dimensions. It has a rear deck for the widest wheels used on the 917, the 17" ones. I seem to remember that only Wyer/Gulf used those. I converted mine to the width for 15" rear wheels. I also added a 1 mm strip between the bottom and top halves, increasing the height a tad - that's the only shape problem that I see. Rob

If you're part of a model club, donate it to them. They know exactly what they are dealing with, can sell your stuff to members or at shows, and can even deal with partly-built kits. The monetary gain can go to your family, to the club, or a charity, in any ratio you like. We experienced the above in our club during 2023: two members passed away, and a third fell ill. We handled some 125 kits and 400 books, plus paint, tools and more. It wasn't always easy emotionally, but we found new homes to nearly everything, and that felt good. Rob

I believe that you can increase the effectiveness of any stripping medium by putting it in an ultrasonic bath. The vacuum bubble implosions have a hammering effect that actively removes the coatings. Here are my experiences: https://robdebie.home.xs4all.nl/models/ultrasonic.htm Rob

A loigical experiment would be to skip the thin dust coats, and do a wet coat straight away. Or as a variation, do one dust coat and a wet coat immediately afterwards. Rob