Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Recommended Posts

Is the 1/25 AMT '32 Ford Tudor Sedan kit lost forever? Granted, with the newer and better 1/25 Revell '32 Ford Tudor Sedan more easily available having the older AMT version back is hardly necessary, but it does offer some unique things, and even for the sake of nostalgia, I think it still holds some appeal. If anyone here has one of these, please take some pics and share with teh class.

Pics from eBay listings, just to show the contents:

AMTT13332FordTudor1.jpg.8b0ebc1a14601b979a392e61268f388e.jpg

AMTT13332FordTudor6.jpg.60668f07cca12fbcb476ffc004fda01e.jpg

 

AMT's generic Ford hot rod decal sheet: 

AMTT13332FordTudorSedan4.jpg.15fb54b2fb5e90bbca89add7c4288c6d.jpg

 

AMTT13332FordTudor2.jpg.bd7c915b62384778c3f491bdc79eaa76.jpg

AMTT13332FordTudor3.jpg.bccbeb5c613f57f2990ee2b53146e1fb.jpg

AMTT13332FordTudor4.jpg.9b9b96a5cd0f79fe1dd4268ecc270dd7.jpg

AMTT13332FordTudor5.jpg.0f093c6fc4b618ca1141989c4e61ef60.jpg

AMTT13332FordTudorSedan2.jpg.2d6a40c1b014f60a68e62e68cb676201.jpg

AMTT13332FordTudorSedan3.jpg.d0ee74635a8216dd0d18086e98b1779b.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

That sedan used the phaeton interior bucket.  I never got around to comparing them, but I'd suspect that it was altered to fit into the sedan body.  If so, Ertl having made it fit the phaeton again would have made it (again) not fit the sedan body.  

That said, maybe now it would be possible to just tool a new sedan interior, copied from a sedan kit piece.  If anyone at Round 2 thought there would be enough demand for a reissued sedan, that is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd much rather have seen this one repopped than the narrow mpc version. Here's the perspective again from left to right of the mpc, amt and revell bodies.

P1018392.JPG

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Mark said:

That sedan used the phaeton interior bucket.  I never got around to comparing them, but I'd suspect that it was altered to fit into the sedan body.  If so, Ertl having made it fit the phaeton again would have made it (again) not fit the sedan body.  

Hard to tell from the lone clear image I found on eBay, but it looks like AMT did little more than extend the sides, without adding much of any new/different detail. This is the AMT/Ertl reissue from 1989:

AMT32FordPhaetonInterior.jpg.5ca1efb7f49f22d3db13f5d94ac32f90.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

For the sedan, I figure the sides were tweaked to make the bucket a little bit narrower, to slip inside the sedan body.  The rear door lines were definitely wiped off the sides.  

Undoing the width alteration (if it was done) to make the interior fit the phaeton body again would make the interior not fit the sedan again.  The door line apparently wasn't an issue, as I don't think that was reversed for the phaeton reissues.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I've read, Ertl could not find the sedan body insert. Then again, they also at one point couldn't find the 40 Ford Sedan Delivery body insert either. My guess is that the 32 Sedan body insert is in the 1940 Willys tool, where it originated. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Dave Darby said:

My guess is that the 32 Sedan body insert is in the 1940 Willys tool, where it originated. 

That was going to be my next question-- Is the body in the AMT Double '40 Willys Coupe/'32 Sedan the same as included in the AMT '32 Ford Tudor Sedan stand-alone kit? I think the answer is Yes, and the body shell wasn't altered between the two releases, but not really sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the body in the one-shot Street Rods release is from the double kit.  If I remember right, you can see traces of a couple of the locating pins that were molded into the double kit body for attaching the custom fenders.  AMT did tool a new three-piece hood for that kit however.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tudor body same from those issues. But it had no real stock bits, iirc interior was buckets ala 60’s show car. 
Surprised it took years to merge Tudor to stock bits, maybe longer. Phaeton was out in 69. Have that and SR issue, Tudor SR too. 
None of the kustom stuff made it into the SR issue. 

Edited by keyser
Date from Phaeton thread
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thinking about it now, it is kind of surprising that AMT didn't issue the stock sedan instead of the phaeton in 1969.  That was right about the time that they converted the Willys double kit to eliminate the sedan and add the pickup conversion parts.  It would have been natural for them to piece it into the Victoria kit just as they had done by creating a new phaeton body for the same kit.

Then again , look at Rod & Custom issues from around then...Thirties Ford phaetons were hot.  A number of bodies and cars were being bought in Australia and shipped in.  AMT's kit was supposedly scaled from an Australian body, which did differ in minor ways.

Note too, the original issue AMT box art refers to the phaeton as "rarest of the Fords"...not so.  The B-400 convertible sedan was produced in fewer numbers, and is rarer than the phaeton.

Edited by Mark
Info
Link to post
Share on other sites

Imagine my surprise at Lone Star Roundup a couple years back when 2 B400’s and a Roadster pickup showed up. Amongst other stellar stuff 

E9120D34-51AB-4D04-A52B-29A7AF4574EA.jpeg

B2820CCF-D892-4BA0-99B5-EB0C067FBA48.jpeg

133CFCFE-3856-44D5-B341-0C759C0CD39A.jpeg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...