Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

So let's take a peek shall we?

First up the well known and seen before 1971 Olds 442.

20220720_140731.jpg.777ce797e5f0e52db771e1b1e0e46209.jpg

Next up the reissue boards. Couple of things on here that have been mentioned in passing, but now with box art prototypes

20220720_140745.jpg.39abc4f9e624bd6e0ce0869d71a28d8f.jpg

20220720_140755.thumb.jpg.6c6d74bf4021e3f3c2ef7b019bc9b3b1.jpg

The 32 Ford is right around the corner, complete with an actual box.

20220720_140808.jpg.f5c931d83f60118c515cde6c9d501ab7.jpg

20220720_140703.jpg.3f9fc232fc18e9a33650e9cc2a0394ef.jpg

20220720_140723.jpg.8fd3b75243c4d3225aaf1f75262c393d.jpg

20220720_140712.jpg.2b6eac151418d3e825761ce19275ab78.jpg

Aaaaand what we really all came here for, the debut of the 1971 Mustang. I drive to Nebraska so you don't have to...

20220720_140543.jpg.d7158996dab72d01e3c451d2dfff2baa.jpg

20220720_140553.jpg.9fa96b5ec8b7f43d57355d2277c4d2d5.jpg

20220720_140628.jpg.a8f53008de5c5aada8631bbdb5b20320.jpg

20220720_140602.thumb.jpg.b5152fa066d538ed5a6f62886a555001.jpg20220720_140642.jpg.8884f3233af88b730a74548a29263306.jpg

Edited by niteowl7710
  • Like 7
  • Thanks 4
  • niteowl7710 changed the title to Revell in Omaha (2022 IPMS Nats)
Posted

A lot of interesting stuff here thanks for sharing. "Pulled pork" lol I want it only for the box art I know nothing about the quality of the kit.

Posted (edited)

Thank you  James for the photos , And Revell for some cool kits coming .............. at lease 4 Oldsmobile's ,one 32 roadster ,one Duster F/C and one '39 Chevy and 4 Mustang's  My wallet will feel the hit for these ....................... LOL !!!!  

Edited by Mr mopar
Posted

Thanks much for these photos! 

1939 Sedan Delivery has the same engine as the 1966 Malibu, which is great in its self.

1971 Olds! Awesome!

1971 BOSS 351 looks great, too (headlamps a little big?)

Posted (edited)

The 1932 Roadster looks intriguing.  Might just have to get one of those.  I also might just have to get the 1/32 Bison & Mack R600, too.

Edited by Jim B
Posted (edited)

I like the Mustang. Finally a good 1/25 Cleveland!

Let's hope it has both black and silver stripes. 

I wonder how long it it take before someone converts one to a 73?

Edited by Oldcarfan27
  • Like 2
Posted

The 1:1 car they scanned has a deluxe interior, so that should make it easier to build a Mach 1 version (for them and for us).

 

Posted
59 minutes ago, 1972coronet said:

1971 BOSS 351 looks great, too (headlamps a little big?)

I was just thinking the exact same thing 

Posted

For the Pulled Pork kit.

It was First out in the '80's as the "Puldozer"

Unbuilt Monogram Blazer Pulldozer 1/24 scale model kit | Toys Trains and  Other Old Stuff LLC

Then  the "Mad Mudder" in the 2000's

Revell/Monogram 1975 Chevy "Mad Mudder" 4x4 Puller Pickup Truck

Now it is the "Pulled PORK"

It was made from this kit.

MONOGRAM Sheriff's Blazer Chevrolet K-5 4x4 - 1:24 Model Kit # 2249 NEW &  SEALED | eBay

In order to get a close-to-stock version, you can kit bash with this pickup kit to get a stock hood, suspension, rims, and engine.

What you cannot get are the Back Seat and "Topper or removeable shell" over the back.

Revell Monogram 1976 Chevy Stepside 4x4 Pickup Truck Model Kit 1/24 85 |  Shore Line Hobby

But I am thrilled to see it return!

Good to see the '39 Chevy, but sad that it still has those truly outdated wheels.

As noted by Jim B, the Mack and Bison big rigs are 1/32 scale. For all that, very sharp kits. 

 As for the rest.....Except for the '32 Roadster, are meh. Good to see the TD "Cop-Out" reborn as the "70 Plymouth Funny Car" It still has the light bar. (Which I'll be getting a couple of when eBay guys start to part that kit out)

Posted
1 hour ago, 1972coronet said:

(headlamps a little big?)

Here we go again, anything else wrong with it? They finally show us a preview and it's already getting critiqued. 

The AMT was lambasted that the lights were too small. Are we EVER satisfied?

By the way - NO they're not too big!

001-querio-1971-ford-mustang-mach-1-front-three-quarter-alt-2.jpg.c2091d3f2440d12f2ee1c021157baa6f.jpg

  • Like 4
  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)

The ‘71 4-4-2 and Boss 351 will be getting my money for sure. I need to know more about the contents of the ‘32 before deciding if I need another one of those. The rest do little, to nothing for me. The Tom Daniel Duster funny cars especially. I liked the looks of Daniel’s original “Cop Out’ much better. 

Edited by unclescott58
Posted
1 minute ago, gasman said:

Good too see the Silverado is the stock version. 

I'm glad to see it back again. Based on the box art, I am going to guess stock wheels are back in but the custom lowered suspension is still in over the stock height suspension. It would be nice to see the stock rear bumper and exhaust, but again I am going to guess those won't be appearing in this issue.

Posted
1 hour ago, Oldcarfan27 said:

Here we go again, anything else wrong with it? They finally show us a preview and it's already getting critiqued. 

Knock-a-self a pro slick. Better to present the hypothesis before the final tooling is cut -- and for those who know more about 1971-1973 Mustang cosmetics than I do; they can opine and, possibly, clarify. 

Looks GREAT to my eyes otherwise. And, yes, a potentially great 335-Series engine is a bonus.

Posted
2 hours ago, Oldcarfan27 said:

Here we go again, anything else wrong with it? They finally show us a preview and it's already getting critiqued. 

The AMT was lambasted that the lights were too small. Are we EVER satisfied?

By the way - NO they're not too big!

Yeah they look the right size to me based on the pic you posted, I'm guessing it's just the unpainted plastic that makes them look larger. I do feel though that there is nothing wrong with critiquing a new tool kit, especially in the early stages where they can get feedback and fix the issues before it is too late. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Dave Darby said:

And did RoG kill off the Monogram name?

I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case, since it is really only for nostalgia at this point. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Oldcarfan27 said:

Finally a good 1/25 Cleveland!

Photo is lacking clarity...I'll buy one & judge for myself if it's good or a sugar coated "Weezer"

Posted (edited)

Here we go again, and here we go again with the "here-we-go-again"s.

5 hours ago, Daddyfink said:

....and let the games begin! LOL! 

Pin for Later: 22 Feelings Everyone Who's Obsessed With Pokémon Go Will  Understand When Your Friend Is on the W… | Napoleon dynamite, Sibling  fighting, Fighting gif

Yup.

The silver car shot a few posts above doesn't really settle a danm thing, but this picture might:

spacer.png

Recognize those thick rings around the lenses as a grille feature, and it all ought to look quite a bit better.

The rest is making a VERY strong first impression, as well it should from the late-20th century scaling techniques finally adopted for it.  I'm ready to bet it'll leave a nice, SportsRoof-shaped crater where any previous '71-'73 tooling has been.

The drip rails on that 442, tho...

Edited by Chuck Kourouklis
NOT the silver car DIRECTLY above
  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...