junkyardjeff Posted yesterday at 03:06 AM Posted yesterday at 03:06 AM Planning on building a mid 50s F600 or larger truck and those had the Lincoln engine and wondering if one was ever made,most likely will just use the Ford Y block but would be nice if a Lincoln engine was made.
sfhess Posted yesterday at 06:08 AM Posted yesterday at 06:08 AM Didn't one of the AMT Model T kits have a Lincoln engine?
rattle can man Posted yesterday at 07:09 AM Posted yesterday at 07:09 AM Sort of. The 25 Model T has what is billed as a Lincoln V8, but it isn't very accurate. And it does not have any stock version, only hot rod intakes and headers. According to a few sites I checked, Ford Y blocks ranged from 239 to 312 CI, while the Lincolns were from 279 to 368.
Mark Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago The Monogram 1/24 scale '56 Thunderbird engine could be reworked into a 1/25 scale Lincoln engine. The two are similar in block shape and port spacing, different in size. You would have to make exhaust manifolds, valve covers, and other parts, and come up with a transmission. 1
MeatMan Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago (edited) I love it when something new on this forum. I was unaware of the differences in these engines but heard that there were some. Check out this info if you haven't already. https://macsmotorcitygarage.com/fords-forgotten-y-block-the-1952-57-lincoln-v8/ http://www.ford-y-block.com/lincoln-y.htm Edited 17 hours ago by MeatMan
Ace-Garageguy Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago (edited) 2 hours ago, Mark said: The Monogram 1/24 scale '56 Thunderbird engine could be reworked into a 1/25 scale Lincoln engine. The two are similar in block shape and port spacing, different in size. You would have to make exhaust manifolds, valve covers, and other parts, and come up with a transmission. ^^^ This is the response you need to take to the bank. There's also a thread on this very board (from years ago) discussing just exactly why the engine in the AMT chopped-T double-kit (and its derivatives) is totally, completely wrong for a Y-block Lincoln and what it takes to correct it. Edited 17 hours ago by Ace-Garageguy
Mark Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago It's a shame that the T-bucket kit engine is as far off as it is. Even the valve covers, nice looking as they are, aren't quite right (the ones in the Customizing Boat kit are closer, though a bit small as I remember). As far off as that T-bucket engine is, Aurora cribbed it for their '22 T. They put Corvette valve covers on it, and called it a Chevy engine! 1
Ace-Garageguy Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 12 minutes ago, Mark said: It's a shame that the T-bucket kit engine is as far off as it is. Even the valve covers, nice looking as they are, aren't quite right... Yup. I first got involved with a search for a good Lincoln Y-block quite some time back while trying to put together bits for a reasonably close representation of Bill Stroppe's '57 Mercury Mermaid, which used a Hilborn-injected 368 Lincoln engine (bored to 387). https://macsmotorcitygarage.com/a-mermaids-tale-bill-stroppes-wild-57-mercury-roadster/
junkyardjeff Posted 16 hours ago Author Posted 16 hours ago I have one of the Lincoln engines from the T kit in my hands and it looks more like a MEL engine then the Y block with the 56/57 Mark style valve covers,the engine from the T kit has a place for a front mounted distributor where the Y block its in the rear like the Ford Y blocks. The MEL resembles the big truck Super Duty engines so I could make it look like one where it was swapped in after the Y block worn out. 1
Ace-Garageguy Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 10 minutes ago, junkyardjeff said: I have one of the Lincoln engines from the T kit in my hands and it looks more like a MEL engine... Yup. Sounds like you have a plan...but the Mk II valve covers won't bolt to an MEL head...at least without an elaborate adaptor...so there's that.
Chris V Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago The closest thing you’ll find to a Lincoln Y-block is the engine in AMT’s “Customizing Boat Kit”. Given that the kit is from around 1960 the detail leaves quite a bit to be desired. However I’ve found that the bellhousing and transmission from the OHV V8 in AMT/Lindberg’s 1934 Ford Pickup lines up well with the molded in starter for installation in a vintage style build
junkyardjeff Posted 15 hours ago Author Posted 15 hours ago 1 hour ago, Ace-Garageguy said: Yup. Sounds like you have a plan...but the Mk II valve covers won't bolt to an MEL head...at least without an elaborate adaptor...so there's that. If I do it I will use early FE parts to make it work. 1
Robberbaron Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago (edited) 2 hours ago, Ace-Garageguy said: ^^^ This is the response you need to take to the bank. There's also a thread on this very board (from years ago) discussing just exactly why the engine in the AMT chopped-T double-kit (and its derivatives) is totally, completely wrong for a Y-block Lincoln and what it takes to correct it. See the above link for the 2015 discussion. Edited 14 hours ago by Robberbaron 1
Trainwreck Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago (edited) I found this, it's a Franklin Mint diecast '56 Lincoln Continental in 1/24th scale. It's an option if you can find a boneyard version that someone's trying to unload. (this one was over $100) I believe it's a 368 C.I., it doesn't look bad but I wouldn't call it great. Edited 13 hours ago by Trainwreck
bbowser Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 3 hours ago, Ace-Garageguy said: Yup. I first got involved with a search for a good Lincoln Y-block quite some time back while trying to put together bits for a reasonably close representation of Bill Stroppe's '57 Mercury Mermaid, which used a Hilborn-injected 368 Lincoln engine (bored to 387). https://macsmotorcitygarage.com/a-mermaids-tale-bill-stroppes-wild-57-mercury-roadster/ That is wild! 1
1930fordpickup Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago I do understand why but, It's to bad the 3d printers dont male a good version of the engines not represented in scale. I know not worth thier time. Lord knows we need another version of the SBC to look at. (Yes this is total sarcasm). The problem with all of the 60s kits detail is they were made to be toys and we all now want a better version of rarely seen engine.
junkyardjeff Posted 11 hours ago Author Posted 11 hours ago Most likely will use a FE and make it look like it got a engine swap,the FT came out in 64 and to the untrained eye looks like a FE as one fooled me years ago.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now