randx0 Posted April 10, 2009 Posted April 10, 2009 an early Chevy v8 or flat head ? I'm working on a vintage hot rod and just trying to keep everything period correct and feasible.trying to keep it early 60's like 62 or older . I didn't grow up then so I am unsure of what those guys may have done back then but I really like that style of rod.Thanks in advance .
Lyle Willits Posted April 10, 2009 Posted April 10, 2009 The Columbia 2 speed rear was developed for use with Ford flatheads. They would NOT be compatible with small block Chevy V-8's.
randx0 Posted April 11, 2009 Author Posted April 11, 2009 Thanks guys ,I'm just trying to use something out back that I don't usually see on a model T. It's gonna be more custom than drag so no blower just naturally aspirated. I also want a lot of carbs and pipes stickin' out .I think I will use the columbia on this one and think more about the engine .any suggestions as to a kit sourced flat head that is some what unique or just really cool let me know thanks again!
RyanSilva Posted April 11, 2009 Posted April 11, 2009 The 1950 Ford F-1 from Revell has a ardun flathead setup with heads, intake and exhaust. Look for the newer box art, as this has the more accurate ardun heads and intake. Revell 48 ford convert 2n1, but this has motorcity flathead heads...dont think those were around in the late 50's early 60's. Does come with 3x2 intake. There is also the revell 32 ford sedan also.
randx0 Posted April 11, 2009 Author Posted April 11, 2009 The 1950 Ford F-1 from Revell has a ardun flathead setup with heads, intake and exhaust. Look for the newer box art, as this has the more accurate ardun heads and intake. Revell 48 ford convert 2n1, but this has motorcity flathead heads...dont think those were around in the late 50's early 60's. Does come with 3x2 intake. There is also the revell 32 ford sedan also. is the 3x2 intake present or vintage? these newer flatheads get me confused as to what is old and what is current .
randx0 Posted April 11, 2009 Author Posted April 11, 2009 looks like the 40 convertible will have to be built stock
James W Posted April 11, 2009 Posted April 11, 2009 Just a note. The Columbia rear axle found in the AMT 41 Woody STOCK version has bolt detail not found on the Revell piece. If the axle is exposed it could be nice to have the added detail. I think as long as you have skinny tires on the back your Columbia axle should hold up nicely.
randx0 Posted April 12, 2009 Author Posted April 12, 2009 Just a note. The Columbia rear axle found in the AMT 41 Woody STOCK version has bolt detail not found on the Revell piece. If the axle is exposed it could be nice to have the added detail. I think as long as you have skinny tires on the back your Columbia axle should hold up nicely. Thanks I think you will be able to see it so the added detail will come in handy .Now I just have to find that 41 woody hidden in my stash somewhere ,half the fun finding parts in a kit that you forgot about . I guess the 41 will have to be built custom
Helipilot16 Posted April 16, 2009 Posted April 16, 2009 there were lots of cars and trucks converted to small-block Chevy power that still retained the Ford transmission and rear axle. it may not have been a durable combination, but it was done many, many times. how durable or strong the Columbia 2-speed rear axle is who knows? i asked that question myself before and never got a solid answer, just a whole lot of guessing. Dave I can tell you from experience. It's very weak. The Columbia unit was not even strong enough for stock flatheads. These rearends were pulled out of most cars and replaced with standard units. That's why quickchange rearends were developed in the 30s and 40s.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now