Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

tim boyd

Members
  • Posts

    5,689
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by tim boyd

  1. John....here you go....TIM As delivered from the factory (except I cranked the torsion bars to lower the ride height ever so slightly...) Three years later...this was just before the body rot started to manifest itself....I had added some Satellite Sebring Plus chrome pieces, and the 15" mags were running the G60-15/H60-15 BFG Radial T/A's that I won for finishing second nationwide in the 1976 MPC Customizing Championship. (For those that don't know, BFG Radial T/A's were huge bucks up tires back then,,,,I could have never afforded to buy them as a college student with a car loan to boot). Here,,,,those Bazoooka tips, and yep, that was a Mopar luggage rack too (a factory option on the '71 B-Bodies like the Charger SE, but accessory only by 1974)... And here's the window label....note the speed control, Interior/ExteriorDecor Groups, and radio delete (Mopar radios sucked back then, and I could get a hot underdash FMS/*-track plus dual Utah 6x9's for less than the Mopar Am/FM alone....). The "Sold Car" line at the bottom was a note to the receiving dealer that this car was a specific customer factory order, and not be to sold to someone else when it arrived at the dealer. This car was actually just perfect for what I needed back then. The E58 was much better than the B-Blocks on mileage, and it had mid-range torque that the 340 could only dream of. The rest of the car was much quieter and rode better than the '71/'72's (which is what I really lusted for but was too young to buy at the time). The interior decor group sew pattern even exactly matched the '71 Charger S/E (which was and remains to this day my single biggest holy grail from the musclecar era...but only if equipped with the 383 or 440 magnum engines!) Thanks for your interest in this....Cheers...TIM
  2. John....I've noted the same issues re the Street Machine version Hemi....which I'm told actually replicated a 1/1 scale aftermarket "conversion" for Mopar B-Blocks to a pseudo street-Hemi configuration. But without pulling out my old kits...I thought the original factory stock R/T kit had the Noise Reduction Package exhausts, and the "Street Machine" version had the rudimentary representation of the "Bazooka" style exhaust tips we all love.... As an aside here, I had those Bazooka tips on my '74 E58 factory-ordered Road Runner. Within a few weeks of delivery, the orange paint on the inside of those tips was gone (replaced by typical black exhaust stains).... and the orange paint visible on the outside through the Bazooka tip side slots was pretty much replaced by rust within a year. When I did an amateur "restoration" in 1979 (Mopar bodies back then were notorious for disintegrating in midwestern rust belt environments), I ordered two new tips through the local Chrysler store. The Parts Manager had to put them on back order....when he eventually delivered the parts six months later, he told me that one of the tips had come all the way from a Mopar dealier parts department in Hawaii....a long way from Lansing, Michigan, where I lived at the time!. TB
  3. Fred.....Hmmm....maybe more like 2031???? Build/Kitbash # 6 is already underway (with an extreme Z'ed chassis...) - Hmm....I wonder when passion for a kit and/or build topic (e.g., Model A Hot Rods) becomes an obsession??? (Smile) TIM
  4. Hmmm....interesting.....the guy that did the parts breakdown and much of the engineering for the Revell '29a kit is indeed QUITE familiar with real cars....in fact he has his own '34 Ford Five Window Coupe Street Rod, that he built in his own garage....and it's a very sharp looking piece, too. I've seen the photography of real Model A Hot Rods that he and his associate did during the kit development, too. Highly extensive reference material it was. Thus, the most likely explanation is the one in Art's post above. Personally I would have exchanged the plated differential for four plated brake backing plates...but that would have taken up too much space on the plated parts trees. These are examples of considerations in the development of a kit that do impact the final result. TIM
  5. Harry...these days these model kits are largely reflect the effort of just a few dedicated people, unlike the large teams that used to be at Monogram, AMT, et al. This is particularly the case at Moebius and Round 2. Not to mention the challenges of overseas suppliers, 12-13 hour time differences, language barriers, etc. I won't make excuses for the companies here, but from my own personal point of view, I am sometimes amazed at just how much they get right given the challenges they face today. Best...TIM
  6. John G. confirmed that the R/T side graphic has been fixed for this reissue, as described it no longer has the incorrect "hump" under the C-pillar, but instead a constant radius curve in this area, as the 1/1 car has. He also mentioned that Round 2 is pursuing an upgrade on the detail of decal sheets, although probably not in time to have this kit reflect the change. TIM
  7. I just looked closely at the turn signal area of the front bumper. The forward facing turn signal surfaces appear to be represented in the casting (not as a clear lense, but as a plated, lightly recessed surface). The recessed surfaces do not continue round the corners (as a recessed surface) to the sides of the bumper., as the 1/1 scale pictures clearly show. However, it would take a modestly experienced builder about two minutes to accurately paint the surfaces - front and sides - with silver/white paint that approximates the appearance of a pre-1963 model year turn signal lenses. My view is that this is a really minor point of concern, and very easy to fix. Others may see it differently. Certainly everyone is welcome to their opinion/view as long as they have their facts correct. On the other hand, it is also important to keep in mind the context of any potential "issues" relative to the overall technical achievement and finished appearance of any kit. TIM
  8. James2 said: "Very nice Tim, any pix of the chassis?" ******************* James....see images #30 at this link: http://public.fotki.com/funman1712/tim-boyd-on-line-mo/tim-boyd-on-line-mo-2/tim-boyd-on-line-mo/page2.html Thanks for asking....TIM
  9. Aaron....just handled. See images #32-34 at this link: http://public.fotki.com/funman1712/tim-boyd-on-line-mo/tim-boyd-on-line-mo-2/tim-boyd-on-line-mo/page2.html Thanks for asking....TIM
  10. Thanks Mark for the tip on the injectors in the Prestige Series and subsequent reissues....took me a bit of looking to find them, but yes, there they are. Drilled 'em and painted 'em last night...will mary them to the manifold later today....then.....where to put 'em? Gasser? Jr. Fueler? Hmmm.....Thanks again. TIM t
  11. Excellent, well thought out and methodical approach to your chassis modifications....yielding great proportions and a very clean result. Count me as continuing to be impressed. Nice choice on the Caddy engine, too! TIM
  12. Most excellent!!!! TIM
  13. Thanks to Dave Metzner at Moebius Models, a package showed up on my porch yesterday, unannounced. Gee...could it be the final production version of the much-anticipated 1961 Pontiac Ventura? Ripping open the box....yep, sure is. Fresh from a salon photography session this morning, click on this link for 48 full size images with commentary for each image (use the "Roll" feature to expeditiously review each image and the caption that goes with it.) I think you guys are gonna really like this one....but take a look and form your own opinion. Thank for looking....TIM
  14. That is some seriously cool period funny car work there, Bob. Did you ever enter any of these in the old MPC Model Car Customizing Contests at the Hot Rod shows back then? They would have been very competitive entries, I am sure. Thanks for sharing your pics....TIM
  15. To Everyone that responded here....Guys...thanks a bunch for all the comments and feedback. Much appreciated. Just remember to share the credit here....as a number of you inspired this build with the changes you did on your own projects involving this kit. I would have probably ended up somewhere like this on my own, but your ideas and suggestions helped me focus my thoughts and certainly egged me on to get on with it and start/complete this project. Specific comments back at 'ya... * Chris...I agree that the orange/bronze metallic and all-black interior might be even more period correct for a build started/completed in the early 1960's....might I suggest 1961 Chrysler Cinnamon Metallic as one choice back when hot rod builders picked their colors from the latest OEM color chip manuals...(All: watch for more on this topic in your favorite model car mag (Model Cars) soon...) * Bill...yeah that low angle rear 3/4 might be my favorite view too....I need to re-shoot that with the corrected exhaust tip alignment... * Aaron and James...let me see on those photo requests....keep your eyes on this thread.... * Dennis....this one might be my favorite of the Revell kit roadsters too so far...either the favorite or tied with the original turquoise build of the box stock highboy version back in August... * Bernard....needless to day I am highly eager to see what you do with this kit. Bring it on, Man! Also...my next build of this kit will also feature an increased Z. Cool thing about this kit is that with both those chassis designs in one kit, the extra parts stack up quickly, making that Z operation a breeze without scratchbuilding or having to buy yet more kits. As regards the sectioned Deuce grill vs. the stock Model A grille, I actually mocked up the A grille on the nearly-completed model, and it looked very cool too. (This is the way the 1/1 scale Hammond car, pictured in the Andy Southard book and mentioned in John's note above, was configured). Of course, the non-sectioned A grille was nearly touchin' the ground, but that's OK too! * All.....glad you guys like the Miss Deal wheels and tires. I've used this combo on a whole number of builds over the last 15 years or so, but mostly on drag fuel altered or gasser-themed builds. .But after looking at all my old car mags from the 1960's, this style of wheel and rubber combo started to come into play on (semi-) street driven hot rods as well. And as you noted, the rubber rake helps the overall stance, beyond the suspension lowering. To bring this model to the shelf actually required more work than I expected. Much of it, though, would have been avoided by sticking to the kit Nailhead (maybe with the tri-power manifold and spark plug covers from the old AMT Trophy Series 1932 Ford Custom/1940 Willys Double Kit) rather than jamming in that FE V8. The FE swap actually fit surprisingly well as a basic swap without mods/kitbashing, but lots of little tweaking was required to make it fit 100% the way I wanted. Again, going with outside the frame rail headers - instead of the factory exhaust manifolds - would also have avoided the frame rail tweaking and steering gerar box relocation, further easing the swap, but the inside frame rails exhaust setup was much more common on 1//1 scale hot rods built during the early-mid 1960's, so that's the way I did mine. Again, thanks guys for your enthusiasm and comments. And keep posting your own work, be it just-started or well underway projects, or completed models, It inspires all of us. Cheers...TIM
  16. It has been very well documented that Chrysler was developing other versions of the 426 Hemi for street use. Specifially, for use on the Mopar C-Bodies (Plymouth Fury, Dodge Polara/Custom880/Monaco/Monaco 500 and the entire Chrysler lineup) A 1966 Chrysler 300 "M" letter car, with the 426 Hemi, was in the approved 1966 production cycle until it was cancelled in the middle of 1965, and a similar Dodge Monaco 500 was also in the plan (with, at one, point, the "fastback" C-pillar treatment lifted from the '66 Chrysler 300). These were both to be limited in production (500 units each), but were to be more broadly available in 1967 when the Hemi engine was to be modified to add A/C availability, as well as a tri-power carb setup to replace the dual quads for these C-Body applications. That program, too, was cancelled before production started. There are a few 1/1 scale prototype parts floating around that were cast up to support these applications, in particular, driver's side exhaust manifolds modified to fit the C-Body application. Oh, what might have been! Cheers...TIM
  17. Walter...yes I dug out that kit and looked at it. I didn't like it that much for this application due to (hope my memory is correct here) the very short split wishbones, and again, if memory serves correctly, the layout that placed the transverse leaf spring atop the axle (Model T style) as apposed to behind the axle, which lowers the ride height accordingly. . What I am going to do soon on one of my kitbashed of this kit is to use the Replicas and Miniatures Model A Highboy/Halibrand Quick Change kit which has its design roots in the early 1960's Revell Roth Kits and Revell Parts Pack componentry . Also, in my earlier kitbash of this kit into a chopped '30A Five Window Coupe, posted here a couple of months ago, I used the entire transverse leaf spring/Halibrand Quick Change layout from the old Monogram "Little T" (reissued many times including just this last year). This is not the complete "transverse leaf spring behind the axle" layout that I prefer, but it was a quick-to-build adaptation to get a QuickChange/Transverse leaf spring execution using parts in most builder's stashes. Thanks for the idea/suggestion, though. Cheers...TIM
  18. One of my all time favorite 1/1 scale pro stockers....very, very cool to see your adaptation here. Will be watching for updates....TIM
  19. Thanks Mark. I had great inspiration (e.g., the \builds already posted by other forum members here and in the "on the workbench" sections) to add to my own thoughts....TIM
  20. Thanks Tom....yes, the color is a bit unusual but it is a period/historically correct choice. In looking again at the photos here after reading Scott's comments, this is one of those hard-to-capture-accurately-in-photography colors... the real color has a bit more orange than it appears with the images here. It's similar to, but slightly less chromatic, than the 1964 Mercury code L "Bittersweet" color, for those of you familiar with that color. I've actually assembled a comprehensive article on this topic (e.g., period-correct color choices for traditional hot rod era projects) that I sent to Gregg/Harry/Darryl a couple of months ago, hopefully it will appear in the mag sometime early next year. Best....TIM
  21. My most recent project was a build of the Revell '29A Channeled Roadster version, with some changes to deliver what I view to be a more visually appealing execution of the early-mid 1960's channeled hot rod roadster genre. I also swapped in a different engine - the outstanding Ford FE replica in various AMT-Ertl kits tooled in the late 1990's. This one came from the '60 Ford Starliner kit (actually, the Round 2 reissue from a few years ago that contained two complete FE engines in the same boc - a restored stock version, and a street machine-esque version with a choice of tri-power or dual quad carbs, along with other period aftermarket goodies). But the basic kit engine tooling is also used in the AMT-Ertl '58 Edsel, '66 Fairlane GT/GTA, '66 Fairlane 427, and '67 Cyclone kits. The image below shows the box stock build of the engine (left), alongside the second build that I used for this '29A Roadster project (right). Beyond the obvious differences in paint finishes, the engine on the right has a: * Plated oil plan from the AMT '34 Ford Pickup (the AMT '32 Vicky just reissued also has a plated FE oil pan) * Two "Interceptor" valve covers, which were found in the original issue of the AMT Trophy Series Ryason Craft kit, and the subsequent reissue of the Hull Raiser had one of these still left on the chrome tree - they were not used for the SOHC engine in that kit, meaning if you have two of the Hull Raiser kits, you can steal a set of these valve covers and still have a complete Hull Raiser kit to build). The Ford FE390 Marine engine was "THE" hot ticket in early 1960's drag and ski boat applications - essentially unbeatable if you read the old hot rod mags. Since my hot rod build is intended to be "dated" between 1963 and 1966, I reasoned that an FE 390 was more likely to have been junkyard-available/affordable then the later/newer 406/427 FE engines, and the marine "Interceptor" valve covers would have been a super-cool addition for hot rodding purposes. * The single tri-carb air cleaner from the AMT Trophy Series '49 Ford kit (it was used for the Cadillac V8 option in that kit). * Pre-wired distributor from Morgan Automotive Details. * Note the separately-molded transmission linkage and the complete fuel-pump to tri-carb fuel line plumbing, which are both indicative of the spectacular work being done at AMT-Ertl in the late 1990's by the John Mueller/Dave Carlock product development team... As of today (Thanksgiving 2015), the project is completed. A full explanation and three photos, plus a link to my photo album with more pics, is posted in the "Under Glass" section at this link: But here's a glimpse of the completed project, compared to my box stock build of the Channeled version back when the kit first came out in August/September. Thanks for looking! TIm
  22. Robert....my thoughts exactly on the model year....but I did like the choice of the convertible (which of course, used the angular Cutlass Supreme rear quarters instead of the curved 'hump';rear quarters of the 442 hardtop). A '70 442 or Cutlass Supreme 455 convertible was near the top of my "replica stock kitbash" build list for years....now we are oh-so-close to a kit-based version....keep those fingers crossed....I know I am. TIM
  23. A great choice for a model project, and a very clean and convincing assembly. Congrats...it rocks. TIM
  24. Yet another kitbash, this one takes the [ in the view of some of you ] aesthetically challenged box stock Channeled Roadster version and applies some tweaks to deliver a more visually appealing result. Changes include a vertically sectioned radiator shell to reduce 50% of the kit width (thereby relocating the grille shell rearward vs. the kit location), and chopping the kit's windshield and frame. A sectioned '32 Ford Grille Shell and insert from The Model Car Garage. a 390 cubic inch Ford FE engine from the Round 2 AMT '60 Starliner kit, and wheels and tires from the Revell Miss Deal Studebaker Funny Car kit, cement the design vibe to the 1963-67 hot rodding time frame. (Some details of this build are inspired by an Andy Southard photo of the Paul Hannon channeled '29A Roadster leaving the Monterey Kar Kapades on March 4, 1962 (source: p. 32, "Hot Rods and Customs of the 1960's, Andy Southard, Jr, 1997, Motorbooks International) Chassis changes include a further lowering of both the front and rear suspension, along with a Halibrand Quick Change out back. The steering gear box is relocated rearward, requiring a refashioned, longer drag link with a cowl mount location. A flush firewall was fashioned and covered with BareMetal brushed aluminum foil. The color is MCW Automotive Finishes special order '56 Lincoln Island Coral (rubbed out and waxed without clearcoat, which is the period-correct treatment for exterior paint), and the interior upholstery is Testors Model Masters Lacquer Ford Wimbledon White and Tamiya Matte Black, with Tamiya Flat Clear. Those of you that have been following the Revell '29A Roadster builds on the Forum will note that I've used some of the same changes already shown by the several of the highly talented builders who post here. You guys know who you are - thanks for the inspiration! Check out the photos at this link, starting at image # 22 for the latest details, and a few photos comparing this version to a box-stock build of the channeled roadster version. (a front three-quarter bird's eye view showing the changes described above) (note - that exhaust tip on the driver's side was repositioned to match the other one after this photo was shot!) (one of three photos at the link comparing the box stock channeled version on the left with the revised version on the right.) Thanks for looking and Best Regards everyone....>TIM .
  25. Mark...you mean the original '63 annual kit? (Don't have one of those in my stash...). Thanks...TIM
×
×
  • Create New...