Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Force

Members
  • Posts

    4,300
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Force

  1. 19 hours ago, kensar said:

    Thanks for commenting everyone.  I'm pleased others are getting build tips from my posts as that is the point in it.

    Loosely following the kit instructions, I started working on the front end.  I reduced the diameter of the suspension mounting points and shortened the camber adjustment in order to place a nut and shaft there.  The as-molded kit parts are on the left and my mods on the right.

    Ford-GT40-40.jpg

    I lathed off the grooved lines of the brake disc and made some disc faces on the lathe from aluminum, which I glued on the plastic backing.  I found the brake discs were not concentric with the hub - how do you screw that up?  The right-most part is how the disc was molded.

    Ford-GT40-41.jpg

    I have completed most of the left front suspension by assembling the kit parts with some modifications for adding details.  I added brake lines and crossover tubes.  I didn't cut out the back of the calipers because it appears that will not be visible.

    Ford-GT40-42.jpg

    Ford-GT40-43.jpg

    I painted in a significant amount of flat black around the calipers and nearby parts, but absolutely none of it shows in the photos.

    I have read in other builds of this kit that the front ride height is about 2mm too high.  I am using Icon Automotive tires (I waited about 2 years to get them) which are about 2mm larger diameter than the kit tires.  The front ride height is determined by the length of the front shocks, so I shortened them about 1.3mm to be on the safe side (I would rather err on the low side of the ride height).

    After finishing the right side suspension, I will move on to the torsion bar setup.

    Thanks for looking in.

    I don't know why the Asian model companies do the discs grooved, I have seen several examples of that, the discs/rotors can be ventilated, slotted, drilled or nothing, but they have flat and smooth surface with no grooves what so ever.

  2. On 4/22/2024 at 2:34 AM, rattle can man said:

    has anyone tried the Testor's version? I have the two Countach set, minus the ball cap that came with it. I've thought of using it for a Cannonball build-a-thon. I've got the ambulance, stockcar and Countach kits from the movie series. were there any others?

    For the Cannon Ball Run Countach there are only two alternatives as I see it, Fujimi Enthusiast Model EM series wich are full detail but they have curbside versions also and I believe they are RS series, or the Aoshima kit.
    The Fujimi kits are demanding to build as the body with flares and everything are separate pieces but with patience it will be a nice model.
    The Aoshima kit is a bit simpler than the Fujimi EM series kits but easier to build, and it looks good (I have one of each).
    So if you going to build an accurate model of the Cannonball Run Countach wich was a 5000 Quattrovalvole (QV) you need to go with either of these two and add the front wing.

  3. On 4/20/2024 at 1:27 AM, James Maynard said:

    Oh ok. I've talked to AITM on Facebook recently and asked them for an old Mack cab. They said they do have the one I want.

    It's probably one of Dave's own left over after he passed a couple of years ago but they don't have any production as far as I know.
    Dave Natale was into Mack trucks and built many of them...and of course casted them.

  4. On 4/17/2024 at 9:22 PM, James Maynard said:

    They are back up and running on Facebook. 

    AITM is on facebook and run by Dave's family, but they don't have much for sale other than leftover parts and I don't think Dave's son casts anything, it doesn't seem so...so I can't really say they are up and running.
    Keystone still has their facebook page but they for sure are out of business.

    • Like 1
  5. American Industrial Truck Models is no more since Dave Natale passed away, Doug Wagner at Keystone Aluminum Model Miniatures had AITM stuff a while but there was a glitch somewhere and he closed up shop and some of the AITM stuff got back to Dave's family.

    • Like 1
  6. On 4/5/2024 at 2:08 PM, Jürgen M. said:

    Where do you guys know all this from? 🤔

    I'm glad you do, I can learn so much here! 👍

    Years and years of modelbuilding and research on upcoming and planned models.
    I like to get my models as accurate as possible.
    Another thing, I've been around and been tinkering with cars and trucks all my life and I have an adjucation in cars and body and also have a class 1 license to operate both trucks and busses, and wheel loaders and excavators...so I have learned how these things work.

  7. On 4/3/2024 at 7:30 AM, Jürgen M. said:

    Thanks! You're right! 

    I'll correct that! The drawings of the trailer suspension will help me on the trailer! Thanks for that too. I'm really learning! 👍 

    By the way, If I may ask one more thing?

    Did the Kenworths of the late 70ies all have twin turbo engines?

    I've been following some current builds and took a Look at older ones. I also searched in the www, I only found twin turbos except for my old W900 which I posted shortly.

    I'm not sure which engine to choose!

    Don't mention it, if I can help I will.
    Most of the engines with turbos back in the day only had one, the twin turbo setup on inline six engines is a more recent thing, both Caterpillar and Cummins had twin turbos on some of them and Cat still do on some engines, but Cat stopped doing engines for on highway trucks back in 2010 so after that you couldn get a Cat engine in your truck.
    V8 and V12 is another thing, they could have one or two turbos...or none at all.

    On 4/3/2024 at 9:12 AM, Jürgen M. said:

    I corrected the 3D drawing. I think that does the job!

    3D4-springSuspension03.jpg.b2b92a7e06ee36dee4aba1b8fa50f442.jpg

    That looks convincing enough so go for it.

    On 4/3/2024 at 12:54 PM, 37 caddy said:

    The twin turbo setup is a newer design,back in the day they would  have only 1 turbo or even a supercharger.Some didnt even have a turbo,the motor in the white freightliner cabover and the autocar dump truck have non turbo cummins motors.The motors in the AMT kenworth kits is a good version of what a lot of rigs had back in the day,a cummins 335 or 350 engine. harvey

    The engine in the AMT Kenworth W925 and K123 is a NTA wich is not that common, the most common Cummins is the NTC version wich came in different horsepower ratings, but you can of course use the NTA if you want to, both are 855 cui engines and the visual difference is mostly in the oil cooler area.
    I don't know what engine was in the Bruhn K100 and you can't see it so use whatever engine you like, engines available back then was Cummins and Cat 4 stroke, and Detroit Diesel 2 stroke, all in various configurations.

  8. Here is the oil system.

    image032.jpg.8234dbc11b89c5beba1a54d222284345.jpg

    The scavenge pump wich suck the oil from the pan is at the front, the forward  outlet goes to the oil tank and the rear is where the oil from the tank gets back to the engine through the standard oil pump, the filter housing is not used and replaced with an adaptor for remote filter and oil cooler.

    ds_lfront.jpg.1e0dd7ecb47c51264fd3eb3ffdd6f108.jpg.e8ae2994a79af135dec8b8683da71460.jpg

    ds_side.jpg.0a58cdf3cd02124c1f577def17f4186a.jpg.91b30f2796815bc2e208a9dedc4c8a6a.jpg

    18c9e277fd0e6eb25c8cc6326ba33937.jpg.094f62bb56be21e807634ab48bbbaef9.jpg

    4312541473_4fd6d2b0f8_o.thumb.jpg.8c6b9159e0bed55671c98d022a12bf54.jpg

    Here is the adaptor for the remote oil filter and oil cooler and back into the oil gallery in the engine, one out one in, the brass piece is the oil pressure sensor for the oil lamp and the outlet for the oil pressure gauge.4291719559_8447b7cf97_o.jpg.8923d35d14daccf1d30028d67d434005.jpg

     

    • Like 3
  9. U bolts, yes that's a good idea.
    You forgot part number 3 right in the middle of the breakdown picture wich the springs are attached to, it's  called leaf spring equalizer and it's kind of a hinge in the middle hanger and are crucial for this suspension to work properly and smoothly.
    Leaf springs can't be solidly mounted, the arch of the spring gets flatter when loaded so they grow in length and has to be able to slide in the mounting points, and this equalizer wich is a pivot point between the front and rear spring are on every 4 spring suspension I have seen.

    Here is another picture so you can see how it looks, the equalizer has number 4 in this picture, this is a trailer suspension and it's similar to the truck suspension, but the U bolts holding the axles are the other way around.
    448.jpeg.609ffeceed42b9b3c4d7b8737f4a7381.jpeg

    Otherwise it looks convincing enough.

  10. Nice build.

    On 3/6/2024 at 11:12 PM, vamach1 said:

    Excellent build.  It’s a shame Fujumi took a short cut and did not include an engine in any of the MkI or MKII kits.  Maybe we will see a MENG kit of a MKI someday.

    If they do as bad job as they did with the 1:12 GT40 Mk II they don't need to bother, the 1:24th kit is better but also on the crudeish side and I don't really like the parts breakdown.
    The best bodies by far are the Fujimi ones and if they had gone the whole nine yards when they did the Mk I and Mk II they would be close to perfect.

    • Like 1
  11. The Revell Top Fuel Dragster kits from the late 80's early 90's has small front wheels that might do the trick, they are a bit narrower and maybe a bit small but they are the only ones I know of.
    First was the Don Garlits Swamp Rat XXX from 1987, then came the Castrol dragster, the Valvoline dragster, the Jolly Rancher dragster, the Mobil 1 dragster and the McDonalds dragster, all these has small aeroplane style front wheels but the later ones don't.

    Here is one I built back in the early 90's.

    DSC06118c.jpg.53dec8f02c56ba76fd0965cdb69d342a.jpg

    • Like 1
  12. 3 hours ago, stavanzer said:

    But, I love this Camaro. I built several when I was in High School!

    I did not know Revell had boxed it. Now I want one......

    Revell and Monogram has been the same company and under the same roof since 1986, they sold their respective kits under their own brand names for a while but they have branded Revell kits as Monogram and Monogram kits as Revell now and then, more of that lately.
    But Revell did never do any kits in 1:24th scale so they are originally Monogram kits.

    • Like 1
  13. I had high hopes for the Meng kit but it's not so much better than the Trumpeter kit, maybe a little.
    But there are several inaccuracies on the Meng kit, much of the ignition wiring and plumbing in the engine bay and the rest of the car has lots to be desired as most of it is totally wrong.
    The Meng kit has a distributor but the people at Meng obviously don't know the firing order of a FE engine, 15426378...how hard can it be, they have grouped the ignition wires left and right side and divided the wires on the distributor cap right in the middle...no no no, 2 wires for each side should cross over for it to be right as the cylinders are 1234 on the left side of the engine seen from the front (that will say drivers side on a GT40 as they were right hand drive) and 5678 och the right side of the engine seen from the front.
    Many of the oil lines are routed strangely and comes from and goes to strange places on the engine and gearbox...some from the engine, engine oil cooler, gearbox are shown to be connected to the water cooling expansion tank on the firewall behind the drivers head...naah, that's not right, the oil cooler on the left side of the car is for the engine and the oil cooler on the right side is for the gearbox, the kit also don't have any oil filter housing or the part for a remote filter either..crucial for a FE as the main oil gallery goes out and in to the oil filter housing and back in the engine.
    And the oil tank for the dry sump oil system is marked to be the fuel tank in the instructions!?!?!!???...the fuel tankS are in the side pods on a GT40 for crying out loud, not under the front hood, and the fuel system from the tanks to the electric fuel pumps doesn't have any connection with the carburetor either.
    Much of the parts are crude, flat, angeled and has a lack of surface detail, so the "feel" is not there when you look at the parts.
    So the designers at Meng and Trumpeter has obviously not seen a GT40 Mk II or a FE engine in real life and obviously have designed the kits from photos and wild guesses instead of doing the research thoroughly and do a correct kit...wich isn't that hard to do with todays technology.

    • Like 1
  14. The Volvo delivery wasn't called 544 because the 544 was the regular sedan, the station wagon/delivery was a PV 445 (split windshield) later P 210 (one piece windshield) Duett and the pickup is most likely also based on the PV 445 as it has split windshield.
    They look similar but there is one big difference between the PV 444/544 sedan car and the PV 445/P 210, the PV 444/544 sedan is a unibody and the PV 445/P 210 is a body on a separate frame.

    Volvo model kits are rare as hens teeth, particulary the older ones, and all I have seen is resin kits.

  15. 14 hours ago, Jürgen M. said:

    I was able to take this screenshot showing the truck from the side. For me it´s hard to tell which kind of suspension this truck has.

    Could be the 4 spring suspension, not sure though.

    .Bruhn06.jpg.4d13f696ba5ae34461a3a24b601d3efc.jpg

    Yes it looks to be a 4 spring and that's what I thought it could have had, that or the Walking Beam...but in this case it looks like a 4 spring Glide Ride.
    You can either use the rear suspension from the AMT White Freightliner or if you want to 3D print here is a parts breakdown of the Glide Ride 4 spring suspension.

    KenworthGlideRideFourSpringSuspension.jpg.f67ce74736b8c45a098d65b0c9eea327.jpg

    • Like 1
  16. On 1/26/2024 at 3:55 AM, FoMoCo66 said:

    I just heard from the Luka Cee Chanel review of the kit on YouTube that white was the rarest one, I also know that if it wasn't white it was probably orange and those were all in the Sox and Martin version. But that signed copy is awesome, never get rid of that kit.

    This kit is not that rare in white, it has been reissued several times in different versions both as the Sox & Martin version and a Pro Street version from Jo-Han and Seville, and Testors issued this kit as a 71 'Cuda with metal wheels in the HSO series (All original parts are in that kit too) and most of the later issues are molded in white and the majority of the ones I have in my stash are white plastic...but I have seen this kit in both orange and green plastic.
    Unfortunately after the Testors issue the tooling seems to have disappeared together with the other kits they issued in the HSO series, I don't know if Testors bought left over stock from Jo-Han/Seville/Okey Spaulding or if they had it molded somewhere, because Testors did not mold kits themselves.

    However, it's a nice well proportioned kit and for it's time quite good (first issued in 1971), and as I said earlier, it's one of my favourite kits and I have several of them.

    So keep up the good work.

×
×
  • Create New...