Jump to content
Model Cars Magazine Forum

Carmak

Members
  • Posts

    700
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Carmak

  1. I just took a look at the Desoto front bumper that comes in the AMT bumpers and grilles parts pack and not only is it chrome already it looks to be correct for a non-bumper guard car.
  2. I have my car for life. A 1968 Coronet 500 convertible. FF1 green with the original green top and a white bucket seat interior. Super reliable 318 under the hood. It's the same car I drove to prom in 1987. Carmak
  3. There was an AMT/Ertl 69 Blazer kit that was red. It was a 1/25 scale diecast. It was also sold assembled in stock and promotional form (I remember a "Wix" version. Carmak
  4. I have a 68 HT and vert that I got at the Old Town Escorts swap meet in 85. They cost me $12 each. I have a 1:1 68 Coronet 500 vert but I can't get it's picture to upload. I would love to see a 68 Coronet reissued!
  5. I will also be in line to a Transit and a Miura!
  6. The tool was labeled as a 63 Thunderbird. I will try to find it. I moved a couple years ago and I have not unpacked my kits. I can't remember if there was glass or not.
  7. Does it have the cheater slicks?
  8. The 66 Thunderbird HT promo tool existed up to the 90's when the tooling was in Iowa. It was sampled in white ABS and I have a copy (un-plated chrome and all). Since the 66 Thunderbird convertible / glue on Landau is very common this is not that exciting, but hopefully a little interesting.
  9. I started building models in the late 70's. I was into Late 50's and 60's full size cars and they were hard to find on the store shelves. I was a serious yard sale/flea market junkie as a pre-teen looking for any cool subject matter. I would re-build what ever I could find that was old. By the early 80's (early teens) I learned of a couple swap meets but with my limited budget builders were all I did. I can't hardly think of building a mint unbuilt pre 1970 vintage kit. I always restore a builder.
  10. I think the 60-62 Chrysler 300's with manual trans had the shifter next to the console. Nice custom!
  11. I have always felt there were three types of sellers at swap meets (both 1:1 car and model car): It's a business, I helps finance my hobby and I need space/want it gone. The business people price at what the market will bear and not that interested in trading, The hobby finance people typically price a little lower and they are more willing to trade. The need spase price it to move and also will often trade. When I sell at a swap meet I am somewhere between a hobby finance and a want it gone seller. I rarely bring home the same kits I take. Carmak
  12. Those look like the leftovers of the sale I went to in Cedar Rapids, IA this spring. I was all Hawk models made before they sold to Round 2. I knew a buyer came in a bought everything right after I was there. Now I know who Carmak
  13. I have any original Plamer 71 Challenger and I really don't mind the way it looks. I know it is off a bit but not in a way that looks that bad to my eye. Interestingly my Palmer Challenger has a dual scoop hood. The slab sides of the Revell Challenger on the other hand look so wrong to me. Carmak
  14. So I just looked at their site. I think they are castings mastered off of a rapid prototype. Nice looking work! Carmak
  15. Those do not look like they were printed on an Objet or an FDM (the melted plastic type) machine. They look like SLA (pool of liquid) or SLS (box of sand) pieces. At work we HAD and SLA (it cost 250K) and when it was retired it was replaced with an Objet. I have pruchased both FDM and SLS parts also. The trick with many rapid prototype machines is support material (what hold a shape the juts out sideways as it is being made). The FDM uses a bulky scaffold matrix, the Objet uses a material similar to crumbly cheese, the SLA uses a delicate scaffold matrix and the SLS uses it's own sand (hard to explain). The only one where you can reach in an pull out a part and not have to remove support in SLS (removing support often destroys delicate details). There are some new hanging SLA builds and I do not know what they use or need ofr a support. I would guess that they are SLS parts. Carmak
  16. Welcome from Riverside, Iowa (just south of Iowa City). I belong to KKIM based out of the Quad Cities. I have been building since the early 80's. I love Des Moines, We have a week long family camping trip each year ending in the Good Guys show. If you are going to be headed to Iowa City send me a PM and we can swap stories. Craig
  17. On one of the Fasebook goups there are people talking about the Revell 1962 Mopar annual tooling. They say the tooling exists and could be re-issued except they do not have the mold for the tires. Can anyone here confirm or refute this? I know these models were only fair by 1962 standards but the subject matter is so cool. Thanks.
  18. I had to move two years ago after living in the same house for 20 years. I got boxes that would hold 12 standard kit boxes. I stopped counting at 100 boxes. I guess it's too many as I don't have any place to put them (more shevling is needed). Carmak
  19. I did a day of it last year in my 71 GTO 4spd and it was a blast. Also attend the night before get together - amazing car show from all over the country! If it gets even remotely close you need to do it! Carmak
  20. Greg nailed it! Good performance with good drivability and mileage. I have had a couple Pontiac tri-powers as daily drivers. Tiny center carb has great response and gets good mileage. Step into it harder and you open up the larger outside cabs and away we go. Notice that most of the mainstream dual quad setups on factory cars in the mid 50's were replaced with tri-power setups by the late 50's and used into the late 60's/early 70's.
  21. I did this wagon conversion in the 80's with a brown GTO and a yellow 65 Chevelle wagon. I used a parts box modified stocker GTO rear bumper just have something different. It's a 2drHT phantom rather than a correct 4dr. Carmak
  22. Odd side topic. Back in the mid 80's a good friend had a white 74 Satellite Sundance. The interior was over the top with yellow, orange and brown stripes on the setas! It was a 318 bench seat car - super reliable but slow. Carmak
  23. Revell / Monogram has been selling that 1:24 70 Plymouth B-body (it started as a GTX and then was modified into a Road Runner) since the mid 80's. As long as it sells they will continue to sell it. I personally would like to see a 68 Coronet (Super Bee or R/T). I have a couple of the original MPC kits but I would like more - I have a 1:1 68 Coronet 500 convertible. At this point I am not expecting one to ever be released Carmak
  24. To address your original question it is quite probable there will never be another new Road Runner kit. For absolute best body proportion your best bet may be to get JoHan 69 and 70 Road Runners off e-bay (expensive). For best detail I would say the AMT 68 is the best we will likely get. Many people (myself included) have combibed AMT and JoHan Road Runners in an effort to get the best total results. Lastly the Revell 67 GTX is 1:25 and is top notch kit. Carmak
  25. I really like this kit but I have one bit-o-advice one building it. Test assemble the rear suspension to see if you like the look. It sits too high in the rear for my taste (near stock build) so I lowered it to get it closer to level. The next one I build will be lowered a little in the front also (lowered in the rear a lot to keep it level) to get a more agressive stance. Carmak Riverside, IA
×
×
  • Create New...