Revell it is time to pull the trigger on an Eleanor kit

[Chuck Most]

4 hours ago, Bainford said:

Nothing. Give me a stock '73 Sportsroof with a flat hood and hubcaps/trim rings, omit the licensing hoopla, and I'm happy. Though, if they include a stock Cleveland with accurate 'Power By Ford' valve covers, I'll be ecstatic.

Know what? You convinced me. 🤣 A non "performance package" car would be nice for a change.

[1930fordpickup]

I never understood her right for a lawsuit or the ability to licience a car that was already made by someone else.. the line in the movie never said it was a Mistang. It was just the car that eluded the thieves every time they went to get it. 

With all my 25 cents worth being typed out. 

Yes put the darn kit out. 

[Can-Con]

12 hours ago, 1930fordpickup said:

I never understood her right for a lawsuit or the ability to licience a car that was already made by someone else.. the line in the movie never said it was a Mistang. It was just the car that eluded the thieves every time they went to get it. 

With all my 25 cents worth being typed out. 

Yes put the darn kit out. 

If you mean the 2000 movie car, I would think it would be Steve Stanford and Chip Foose who'd have more of a claim on the IP of the car as they designed the unique look of it. 

But, yea, another frivolous law suit by someone who thinks the world owes them something. Apparently she was claiming that the cars were "characters" not props and based the law suits on that.