R. Thorne Posted August 14 Posted August 14 An interesting article I unearthed a few years ago when I started my build on the Marrs Boys 1963 Corvette. It appeared in Cars magazine. This is courtesy of the autohistorypreservationsociety.org. 6 3
johnyrotten Posted August 14 Posted August 14 Cool old school tech. There's a guy on YouTube going over a clutched th400. Poor man's lenco. 1
Mark Posted August 14 Posted August 14 The Revell (ex-Monogram) '66 Malibu has a clutch/automatic setup (as well as a four-speed). The automatic transmission in that kit isn't too good, but it's the only kit I know of that ever had that setup. 2 1
presnell Posted August 14 Posted August 14 Years ago I built a 302 for a friend to put in a 55 to drag race with a clutchflite he kept having trouble with the pump drive spider never found a solution.
1972coronet Posted August 15 Posted August 15 Then there was the Liberty 4-speed as well. IIRC, it was the opposite of the Clutch-Flite ; it was typically a Chrysler A-833 , but with a torque converter instead of a clutch. Thanks for the article !
Mark Posted August 15 Posted August 15 I'm surprised this setup didn't get used more often on the street. My thinking would be that a clutch would be preferable over a high-stall torque converter, and if you've got a "built" engine, it probably isn't producing sufficient vacuum to shift an automatic transmission anyway. The clutch would get rid of the negative aspects of the high-stall converter, and the manually shifted automatic would lessen driveline shock and eliminate declutching for shifts.
johnyrotten Posted August 15 Posted August 15 15 minutes ago, Mark said: I'm surprised this setup didn't get used more often on the street. My thinking would be that a clutch would be preferable over a high-stall torque converter, and if you've got a "built" engine, it probably isn't producing sufficient vacuum to shift an automatic transmission anyway. The clutch would get rid of the negative aspects of the high-stall converter, and the manually shifted automatic would lessen driveline shock and eliminate declutching for shifts. It's my understanding these came into play before we had good converter technology. Not really sure how something like this would work on the street, everything I've seen with them were in full blown race cars. Interesting ideas 2
1972coronet Posted Saturday at 02:00 PM Posted Saturday at 02:00 PM 21 hours ago, johnyrotten said: It's my understanding these came into play before we had good converter technology. Not really sure how something like this would work on the street, everything I've seen with them were in full blown race cars. Interesting ideas I seem to remember the B&M 'J' converter from c.1967, 1968 being one of those early , high-stall , "loose" converters. Those were in the '68 Hemi Dart and Barracuda models.
johnyrotten Posted Saturday at 02:13 PM Posted Saturday at 02:13 PM 12 minutes ago, 1972coronet said: I seem to remember the B&M 'J' converter from c.1967, 1968 being one of those early , high-stall , "loose" converters. Those were in the '68 Hemi Dart and Barracuda models. Those cars definitely needed something beyond stock. This car was the first one I heard of a clutched auto. He explains why he chose that option https://www.hotrod.com/how-to/hrdp-0703-supercharged-pontiac-400-engine-build 1 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now