Guest Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 I put a '66 Fairlane chassis under my Ranchero. It's a much better fitting/looking chassis than the '67 Mustang chassis. In hind site, I wish I had tried the '64 Fairlane T-Bolt chassis. The larger rear fender wells would be a non issue since they have to be cut off anyway. The T-Bolt chassis is a perfect fit under a '60 and up Comet. The Comet is a mid size like the Fairlane. It had no "official" brand in '60 and '61 as it was from the Edsel motor company that was going down in flames. It wasn't until '62 that Mercury took over the Comet and Ford began producing it's sister car, the Fairlane. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
von Zipper Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 I put a '66 Fairlane chassis under my Ranchero. It's a much better fitting/looking chassis than the '67 Mustang chassis. In hind site, I wish I had tried the '64 Fairlane T-Bolt chassis. The larger rear fender wells would be a non issue since they have to be cut off anyway. The T-Bolt chassis is a perfect fit under a '60 and up Comet. The Comet is a mid size like the Fairlane. It had no "official" brand in '60 and '61 as it was from the Edsel motor company that was going down in flames. It wasn't until '62 that Mercury took over the Comet and Ford began producing it's sister car, the Fairlane. No, SIR 1960-1965 the Comet was based on the Ford Falcon platform (compact car) It wasn't until 1966-that the Comet shared the same chassis as the Ford Fairlane (mid-size car) But don't take my word for it http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_Comet The second sentence says Quote: The Comet was based on the compact Ford Falcon then later on the Ford Maverick. (Although I will agree that the 1966-1967 Comet was based on the Fairlane platform) Further down the Wikipedia page: 1964-65 The Comet was redesigned with a much more square shape, though it was STILL built on the the same unibody as the 1963. Here's a few shots of a 1963 Comet I was looking at a few months ago It is the same as the Falcon underneath right down to it's 4 lug wheels-the mid size Fairlane would have had 5 lug wheels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Geiger Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 I know some serious cutting of the cargo bed would need to take place, but I think I'm up for it. Good or bad idea? The bed bottom actually comes out quite easy. Just score the line with the back of your eXacto blade. The fact that it's got four rigid sides makes it easier, since it holds shape well as you work. Then you can just clean up the edges and pop the bottom in higher (for a shallow bed look) to clear any suspension issues. BTW, I will also endorse the '67 Mustang chassis. Remember the Mustang is basically a Falcon, so it should be as near correct as we need. I especially like the under hood structure etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
von Zipper Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 BTW, I will also endorse the '67 Mustang chassis. Remember the Mustang is basically a Falcon, so it should be as near correct as we need. I especially like the under hood structure etc. The 64 1/2 to 66 Mustang was the same unibody platform as was the Ford Falcon. Also the Econoline van and pick up shared the same basic platform. The first generation Mercury Comet wagon WAS a Ford Falcon wagon with a Comet front clip and different tail light treatment And as I mentioned earlier-the first Falcons and Comets would have had 13 inch/4 lug wheels-the Fairlane would have had 14 inch/5lug wheels Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 BTW, I will also endorse the '67 Mustang chassis. Remember the Mustang is basically a Falcon, so it should be as near correct as we need. I especially like the under hood structure etc. There is no "correct" chassis for a Ranchero period. The '67 Mustang chassis isn't even close. What works or may work in the real world doesn't always translate to models. Here's a photo of a Mustang chassis under the Ranchero. If you want to do all the work it would take to make that mess right, go for it. This is what the '66 Fairlane chassis looks like shortened a few mms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 (edited) No, SIR 1960-1965 the Comet was based on the Ford Falcon platform (compact car) It wasn't until 1966-that the Comet shared the same chassis as the Ford Fairlane (mid-size car) But don't take my word for it http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_Comet The second sentence says Quote: The Comet was based on the compact Ford Falcon then later on the Ford Maverick. (Although I will agree that the 1966-1967 Comet was based on the Fairlane platform) Further down the Wikipedia page: 1964-65 The Comet was redesigned with a much more square shape, though it was STILL built on the the same unibody as the 1963. It is the same as the Falcon underneath right down to it's 4 lug wheels-the mid size Fairlane would have had 5 lug wheels. Look at a '62 Comet. Now look at a '62 Fairlane. Now look at a '62 Falcon. Which two cars are more closely matched especially in the roof, door and quarter panel area? There are a lot of cars based on the Falcon chasiss platform. But that doesn't mean they share the same platform. The Comet has a longer wheelbase, interior and trunk area than the Falcon does. The Comet is 194.5 inches long. The Falcon is 181. The wheelbase on the Comet is 114. The wheelbase on The Falcon is 109.5. Edited March 1, 2014 by plowboy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
von Zipper Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 So-Are you saying Wikipedia is wrong ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Geiger Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 There is no "correct" chassis for a Ranchero period. The '67 Mustang chassis isn't even close. What works or may work in the real world doesn't always translate to models. Here's a photo of a Mustang chassis under the Ranchero. Wow Roger! Thanks for pointing that out. For as many Rancheros as I own I didn't realize the body was that oversized. I know the nose is way too large for the AMT original Falcons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
von Zipper Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 To cross reference the origins of the Comet-read the Wiki report of the Ford Falcon http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Falcon_(North_America) Read the section called First Generation (1960-1963) I really don't want to start an argument over all of this, maybe it falls under the ill-fated topic that Harry P. started about "Scale Model Inaccuracies" and how some thing gets lost between the real cars and our models? when I put the AMT '67 Mustang chassis into the '61 Comet I had to cut it and add about an inch of length to get the proper wheel base. The Mustang in '67 was a larger car than the first generation Comet and you would think it would have to be shortened rather then lengthened. Although in the AMT/SMP days as with the real car world the Falcon and the Comet were both considered a compact while the Fairlane was considered a mid size. Also remember a few short years earlier the Fairlane was a full size car. I just want to have a healthy discussion about model cars and techniques. (period) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RancheroSteve Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 If we're talking about the real world, the Falcon and Comet are the same car underneath, and the first generation Mustang is virtually the same as a Falcon and Comet (depending on the year and engine, a lot of parts interchange). The '62-'63 Meteor is the Mercury equivalent of the mid-size Fairlane. If you're building scale replica, put whatever you think fits and looks best under there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
von Zipper Posted March 1, 2014 Share Posted March 1, 2014 I guess the reason I mentioned the Comet in a Falcon Ranchero thread is because at one time I studied on taking one of these re-issued Ranchero kits and bashing it with a 1962 Comet front clip As I mentioned before, the Comet wagon was a Falcon wagon with a Comet front clip-BUT- in Modelsville the two plastic bodies will not line up. ( I studied on it) And I thought the Comet front clip should line up to the Ranchero body. Obviously they interchange in real life but not in plastic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Wow Roger! Thanks for pointing that out. For as many Rancheros as I own I didn't realize the body was that oversized. I know the nose is way too large for the AMT original Falcons. The Ranchero isn't oversized. It's just longer than a Falcon or Mustang. The best chassis donor I found for a '61 Falcon is the 1/24 '66 Monogram Mustang. The best chassis donor for a '61 Comet is from the Revell '64 Fairlane. It fits like it was made for it. Even the core support fits very well onto the Comet. If a person wanted to spend the money, they could buy the Trumpeter Ranchero and use the chassis and core support from it. It will be the closest to "correct" for the '61 Ranchero. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RancheroSteve Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Not sure I want to open that can of worms here, but in my eyes the Trumpeter Falcons & Rancheros are rather - shall I say - lacking, from a mechanical accuracy standpoint. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blazefox Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 If I wanted to make a gasser the amt fairlane chassis seems like the best choice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mk11 Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 Not sure I want to open that can of worms here, but in my eyes the Trumpeter Falcons & Rancheros are rather - shall I say - lacking, from a mechanical accuracy standpoint. My sentiments exactly; the whole reason to not waste money on the trumpeter kit is because you have to throw half the kit away and replace them with parts that are actually accurate. It's cool that the 64 t-bolt chassis is such a good fit but it doesn't necessarily follow that it works in 1:1. Like Steve said, the 62/63 Meteor was actually the sister car to the Fairlane and the Comet and Falcon were for the most part twins up to '65. mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maindrian Pace Posted March 5, 2014 Share Posted March 5, 2014 As I mentioned before, the Comet wagon was a Falcon wagon with a Comet front clip-BUT- in Modelsville the two plastic bodies will not line up. ( I studied on it)And I thought the Comet front clip should line up to the Ranchero body. Obviously they interchange in real life but not in plastic. You sure about that? My avatar car is in my garage: -MJS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mk11 Posted March 5, 2014 Share Posted March 5, 2014 Beautiful wagon mike Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawson Posted March 5, 2014 Share Posted March 5, 2014 Mr. Maindrian Pace, You have a very nice Mercury Comet Station Wagon. What year is it ? Is your car built on the Ford Falcon chassis or the Ford Fairlane chassis ? thanks, Larry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maindrian Pace Posted March 5, 2014 Share Posted March 5, 2014 Beautiful wagon mike Thank you Mike. I've owned it for almost 27 years now. Mr. Maindrian Pace, You have a very nice Mercury Comet Station Wagon. What year is it ? Is your car built on the Ford Falcon chassis or the Ford Fairlane chassis ? thanks, Larry Thanks Larry. It's a 1960, first year for the Comet/Falcon. It is based on the Falcon chassis, with the wagons being the same wheelbase as the Falcon wagons and sedans at 109.5". The Comet sedans had a five inch longer wheelbase at 114.5", but their chassis was otherwise the same. My Comet 2dr wagon uses the same 1/4 panels as the Ranchero and Falcon 2dr wagon, which shows just how closely related the cars are. The midsize Fairlane, introduced in 1962, had a chassis with a similar layout, but everything was different and nothing interchanged with the Falcon/Comet. -MJS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freeman Cars Posted March 22, 2014 Share Posted March 22, 2014 Does anybody know if the Round 2 AMT '60 Ford Ranchero comes with the camper shell? I believe this was part of the original issue kit. I haven't been able to get my hands on one of the kits to see if it's in there. Thanks for your help, Sam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxwell48098 Posted March 23, 2014 Share Posted March 23, 2014 Nope. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disabled modeler Posted March 23, 2014 Share Posted March 23, 2014 Nope it does not... ....bummer too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freeman Cars Posted March 23, 2014 Share Posted March 23, 2014 Thank you for your help. Sam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unclescott58 Posted July 3, 2015 Share Posted July 3, 2015 I'm on the verge of finishing my '60 Ranchero. Are the axles too long? Or the shock wheel backs/mounts too short? There is a lot of side to side play with wheels mounted in the chassis. Yet they look like the wheels/tires will not be sticking out to far. Has anybody else noticed this problem with this kit? Scott Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chunkypeanutbutter Posted July 3, 2015 Share Posted July 3, 2015 I think the wheel mounting shafts are too small. I just laid some paint down on mine and decided to glue the hood shut. It's not going to be perfect, but I should have it done within today or tomorrow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.